Jump to content

serguei58

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

serguei58's Achievements

Quark

Quark (2/13)

-6

Reputation

  1. My advice to you, do not look in the mirror and the image of the asshole will not haunt you.
  2. And I had no idea that you are not only a physicist but a geologist and seismologist. A scientist with a wide range of knowledge, for whom there is simple geology, ordinary physics, and not cunning mechanics. Are you by any chance a hemorrhoid specialist? Could you advise my grandfather?
  3. I came to this forum to meet not only professionals, but also people with whom it is pleasant to talk, and I found pouty turkeys who are bursting with a sense of their own importance, like you.
  4. List your questions. For example: 1.... 2 ... 3 ... It seems that bureaucrats have gathered here considering my dissertation for awarding me an academic degree. Prove that, prove it ... .. Gentlemen, I repeat once again, I have put the work here so that you people who know physics can give an overall assessment of my work, point out possible errors and advise some other scientific schemes when implementing my idea ... If you do not understand what we are talking about, then how to show this work to geophysicists who do not have deep knowledge of the physical processes described by me ?????
  5. Ladies and gentlemen, I wrote this article and posted it on your forum with one purpose - to test my hypothesis on the possibility of determining the source of mysterious deep-focus earthquakes. I'm not going to dispute anything, I'm trying to get your advice and your opinion on the possibility of such a process in the depths of our planet.
  6. What can I answer you? You probably think that my article was written in order to mislead you. Experiments with WDM are well known in the plasma research world and there are many good works on this topic. As Jesus said: Knock and they will open to you, or in your case - seek and you will be happy.
  7. What are you laughing at? Fusing muonium in plasma doesn’t mean the same will happen with aluminum dioxide??????????? Quite the opposite, the first condensed plasma (WDM) is obtained from aluminum dioxide (or other minerals, rock, magma), and already the plasma (WDM) synthesizes muons during expansion. It is the scattering of the plasma that causes the appearance of muons, that is, the process is determined by the energetics of the process. The energetics of the process the first not the composition of matter.
  8. Yes. Condensed plasma was produced by impacting a shock wave on aluminum dioxide Al2O3 Under what conditions? Are these conditions even remotely similar to what you propose? - ~ 2aμ = 2h2 / mμe2 ~ 5⋅10−13m.
  9. It’s strange that you don’t know that before you build a model, you need to come up with its idea, design, and method of implementation. Sorry.
  10. Why are you clinging to magma? Muons arise from the scattering of plasma, which was obtained in many laboratories around the world by the high-energy impact on many substances, including minerals and rocks. And magma is not included in this list? Magma only gives impetus to the process. The answer is much simpler than you might think. It simply means that nature has no other way to solve such a problem.
  11. 1. A decrease in the size of a nucleus by a factor of 200 already makes it possible to start a thermonuclear reaction, regardless of the size of the proton. 2. Nature has no concept of energy benefit, if for mankind it plays a huge role, then nature does not care. You yourself confirmed this with the words: The synthesis catalyzed by muons may have a "right to life", but it will be considered only if other, basic approaches will fail. Nature does, nature does not sort out the possibilities based on their benefits. 3. Have you heard anything about the Uranium blanket, which nature can use to cover the resulting thermonuclear reaction?
  12. The fact of the matter is that trying to apply the laws of mechanics and simple physical laws to the calculations of stresses in the earth's crust, geophysicists have not achieved success in their works, which they have produced many thousands. To date, the results are zero! Not a single scientific prediction of earthquakes for the entire existence of geophysics by all geophysicists of the world! No one! This means that the chosen direction of search leads to a dead end. New approaches and ideas are needed. So I offered my own approach to the existing problem.
  13. When other experimenters confirm the new data, then we'll talk. But, even without this 10% of the proton diameter, muon catalysis has the right to life, as confirmed by practice.
  14. You will not find my hypothesis in the textbook. I express it on the basis of fundamental knowledge accumulated by humanity and have already been tested in practice. That is, the hypothesis has a scientific and proven foundation, therefore it has the right to be in the main part of the forum. Just before me, no one thought in the direction I indicated.
  15. 1. Pohl R. Antognini A. Nez F. et.al. The size of the proton.Nature 466, 213–216 (2010). doi:10.1038/nature09250pmid:20613837 2. Beyer A. Maisenbacher L. Matveev A. The Rydberg constant and proton size from atomic hydrogen. Science 06 Oct 2017 Dubious assertion. And you should not doubt that the formation of muons does not depend on the composition of the magma, they are formed like this:e- + e + → µ- + µ +
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.