

Simmer
Senior Members-
Content Count
63 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
-1 PoorAbout Simmer
-
Rank
Meson
Profile Information
-
Favorite Area of Science
Set theory
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Is there a mathematical way to represent the formula itself? i.e. this sentence is about itself being informative
-
no I'm looking for my original interpretation of the formula not the usage stated It was just so similar it inspired me
-
You know what it also looks like? biochemistry the outcome of a catalyst being the catalyst itself
-
Yep i think it's something like e of w replaces w
-
Oh it was different than I thought it was its funny because I see this and I think self become entity and cantors opinion was that of God so I got confused anyway im trying something that looks the same but using empty sets instead of numbers and using relativization instead of exponentialism what a confidence i added "and not all(not e)"
-
So i have cantors equation doing the same thing w^e=e i added "and not all(not e)" obviously is the relativization you were talking about, not a powerset are there any other terms for relativization that might point me in the right direction to program it?
-
I saw something today as I was at the bp gas station in reno a pendulum, made of metal, swinging back and forth by the force of magnitism one under, two on the sides of the pendulum could this be an example of perpetual energy?
-
Simmer started following Consecutive values in set theory
-
Thanks man. Means a lot.
-
Well I mean doing it backwards because I'm stupid
-
I think it should exclude all but itself also do you happen to know how to do Relativizing in python? i think it’s map() but yeah all but itself excluded
-
It’s more like a warning about the equation not being complete
-
Also I sense an all() in the midst
-
Hi I’m crack with something simple https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CantorsEquation.html w^e=e obviously this is the relativity you were talking about they attribute it to ordinal and cardinal numbers but I want to see if it works with w being an undefined set Of course it’s not programmable without the lack of the opposite of itself included so I have all the time I’m the world
-
If I were any smarter, it would probably be cuz of the progeam good talk my friend. With many more to come.