Deviation

How can stretching of space slow the light when actually its a shortcut in space ?

Nope, I dont believe U swansont, That is not what I have been hearing since childhood, Or else how will we travel faster than speed of light using Space bending ? Show me some good web links created by other than U.

Thanks, Swansont. But now I am completely confused , more than before, being an amature, I am always taken for a ride by these scientist.

I was happy to quote here that due to space bending the time taken by the light must be less than what would occur other wise. because space is streched neear blackhole light should take less time than would other wise to travel the same distance.

I have got an Idea to test space bending theory right here from earth. But please tell me if this experiment has already been tested anywhere ?

I am posting this thread in this forum because it has to do with observations.

Look at this image The space is bend near the black hole, if you follow the red line then in the area where space is bend ( or streched ) , U will cover the distance in a shorter distance, right ?

Now the Experiment :

We have seen many space photos with lens effects. Now, if we can determine the events of the object whoes multiple images are seen; then we should note the delay between events of the different images of the same object. If the space is bending then its gona take less time for the light to reach us from that path, so different images of the same objects one event should reach us at different intervals depending on the closeness of the light path near the lightbending gravity object such as black holes.

I request the believers of space bending to show us good pics if they know any.

Human knowledge of space folding does not exist.

 

Some scientists theorize that space is bent because of gravity and some even theorize that shortcuts could exist between points in space' date=' but there is no base of provable knowledge about it.

 

It is nonsense.[/quote']

 

Really ? Well I am not a scientist but I have got brains that U cannot wash.

 

Look at this image The space is bend near the black hole, if you follow the red line then in the area where space is bend ( or streched ) , U will cover the distance in a shorter distance, Got the point ?

Would you be good enough to summarise the "human knowledge of space bending" for the [i']non cogniscenti.[/i]

I am bad

Then you think it is possible[/i'] to create wormholes, shortcuts that would "fold space" ...

Based on human knowledge of space bending I want to know why U doubt it ?

Space bending will not be the end of science , we always come up with something new, Need is the mother of all inventions.

Do you believe in the existence of wormholes in space that can be used as shortcuts to other galaxies or to other regions in our own galaxie?

No I mean we will have to create them

OK Guys I agree U all r smart and I am dumb , But I owe U all my explaination to this

http://scienceforums.net/forums/showpost.php?p=174162&postcount=2

And I far as I remember when Matter Antimatter mate eachother there is tremendous amounts of energy release, so where did that came from in the first place ?

I never get any spyware on my machine

Yes' date=' but do you suppose that that is possible?

 

What it comes down to is whether or not light speed can be exceeded. Do you think that humankind will ever reach that technological plateau?[/quote']

 

If U can create wormholes and control them, then. ie. with todays theories. As we progress we will comeup with new possible theories.

My thoughts exactly. There must be life out there somewhere - we just don't have the means to find it yet.

means = Instant communication or travel

Where did the time vaccum come from ?

Who borowed it and why ?

So why dont U get something for me today, U will get it from nothing anyways.

When you accelerate the particle, it is no longer in the lab frame. To an observer in lab frame, the particle is moving and its clock runs slow, so it takes longer to decay.

How is the size of a frame determined ?

OK thatsit I had enough of this matrix stuff.

If that theory was true then the sky would has been lit blindning bright as the light would had to come back from all over again and again.

...

 

This would only work if you can communicate instantaniously with the reference point (entaglement). It's the only way I can see of being able to share information between reference frames without distortion.

 

I guess it's like being in deep space and moving off in a direction' date=' how do you work out your velocity? (do you use the stars as a reference, or calc it based on accel time, etc?)

...[/quote']

 

All things have speed of time relative to each other. ie. Faster the object slower its time and viceversa. So if we can find objects that have the fastest time relative to all the objects in the universe then thoes objects must be very near to the Origin point of the universe.

 

Send probes at certain points in universe and make them stay for 1 year and then calculate the difference when they are brought together.

 

Thanks.

Freezing is basically removal of kinetic energy from molecules, isnt it ?

If thats true, then why cant we use magnetic force to freeze all the molecules of an object instantly ? That should freeze it instantly ?

There's no way of telling where that point is.

May be not but then its certainly at the center of universe.

There may be a way to find it.

All things have speed of time relative to each other. ie. Faster the object slower its time and viceversa. So if we can find objects that have the fastest time relative to all the objects in the universe then thoes objects must be very near to the Origin point of the universe.

Thanks.

Kind of like the Big Bang?

If the space was created in the bigbang then why can we consider that point as the 0,0,0 cordinate for the universe ?

The best OS ever will be released in 2006 April by a lesser know company called MS. Its supposeldy gona slay Linux Once and for all with its long horn.