Robert Wilson

1 hour ago, swansont said:

One inference that could be taken from this is that it is not an aircraft. 

Don't be so naive, their intention is very clear.

50 minutes ago, Moontanman said:

As I have said before this was not a case of one single object... 

I refer only to Evidence that I see, the testimonies about other objects can be a million things, for example the white "Object" that they saw in the water could be a large flock of fish jumping out of the water, I don't know.

What I'm very confident about is that what we see in that particular video IS a small insect on the camera lens.

I gave at least 4-5 strong evidence that proof that that's what it is.

BTW did you see the legs in my linked picture?

Also, I hope that you saw the video of Neil Tyson, specially minute 3:00 -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BRDCxNEuyg

1 hour ago, Moontanman said:

At no point in this thread have i said this "tic tack" was an alien space craft, the Navy's own explanation supersedes yours, I have no idea if an alien spacecraft has legs or tentacles and neither do you. 

You are pushing what is called in UFO circles "pelicanism"  It means when an explanation is pushed beyond all bounds no matter how silly it is. "pelicans fly much like some UFOs and have been suggested as an an explanation even though they were traveling at 1200 mph +" 

I don't see legs in the video, I honestly figured it was some sort of drone injected into the exercise by the Navy. Now the Navy says no to that. The video is not the only part of that sighting and is in fact footage from later that day after two other jets had tried to intercept them. Them is the proper pronoun as several were seen on the ships radar. 

Now I don't know what they were but one thing is for sure I see no reason to try and push a ridiculous explanation for anything, even UFOs...  

You seem to be saying that one sighting that is explained, by you at least, negates all others. No one here would rather find out there are aliens space craft operating in our atmosphere and apart from a handful of really extraordinary events the evidence is almost completely null. 

You might want to watch this for a larger perspective... 

https://youtu.be/K-FsylX3NgE

 

Dude, I know that you didn't say that it's an alien space craft, but all the reports & videos that I saw about this event (including in the link that you gave) are strongly implies that that is the case: "No aircraft or human made flying object we know can maneuver like that...".

If you assume that the object is external to the airplane then yes, it really looks like it's flying in a 1200 mph +.

I don't think that my explanation is ridiculous, I think that it's much more logic then the clues that they throw.

About the bug legs, it's hard to see on a single frame but I made some print-screens for you, don't forget that the legs are thin and the small insect is out of focus so it's not 100% sharp, but still you can see it clear enough, especially when you watch the video running on a full screen.

Take a look at the picture that I made:

https://i.ibb.co/X4X7spt/Tic-Tac-Bug.png

Can you see the legs now?

1 hour ago, Moontanman said:

Considering all the testimony and the fact the "tic tacs" were picked up on multiple radar, seen by multiple pilots and the radar of an aegis class ship and seen over the course of several days and assumed at first to be radar clutter and the radars were adjusted several times but the "Tic tacs" only became clearer and seen more often  your explanation is "ridiculous" Doesn't make it an alien spacecraft but even the navy has admitted it was something real in the airspace that day and unexplained and several others have been seen now btw... BTW it was officially a UAP, not a UFO...

I think that I gave some very strong points in my post, which you ignored.

I don't know what they saw in the radars, and if the pilots testimony referred to the object that we see in this video or to some other events, it can be just a coincidence that the insect got inside just when the radars detected something.

BTW I forgot to say in my original post that I saw an interview with this pilot few months ago and he said that he did not see the object from the aircraft window, he saw it only in the infrared camera screen, which makes my claim stronger.

And again, where is the video from the other aircraft? If it's camera also saw that object, then why do they show us the video only from one point of view? And why at minute 0:50 in the video you can see very clearly an insect legs? From when an aliens spaceship has legs?  

And one last important point about this subject:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BRDCxNEuyg

Enjoy  

Hi all,

I would like to refer to the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1THwiaXZfzA

which implies that what we see here is some kind of an "aliens spaceship" from out of space.

I think that this is Ridiculous.

Check minute 0:50 and minute 1:15 in the video - that is the so called "UFO" that they saw.

I claim that this is just a small insect on the camera lens, and I don't understand how people can be so blind and not see it.

The aircraft's infrared camera sits inside a pod as you can see here:

https://www.raytheon.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/rtn_475606.jpg

The insect probably got inside when maintenance was done on the aircraft , and it sits either on the camera lens, or on the inside window of the pod through which the camera looks out (and obviously, the insect is not exposed to the outside wind).

That explains why it is SO STABLE in relation to aircraft sight (an external object like another airplane will NEVER be that stable) and it also explains why it is So Blurry... that is because it is adjacent to the camera lens so it is out of focus... Also, take again a good look at the video, you can see pretty clearly the Legs of that insect! can't you see it?

It looks like an insect, it moves like an insect, and that's exactly what it is! just an insect!

Also, why do they shows us the same video from the same aircraft all the time? Where is the video from the same event taken from the OTHER aircraft? let's see it and compare between the two videos. If it's really an external object to the airplanes, then we should see it moving EXACTLY the same way second by second in both videos! So where is the video from the second plane? Or maybe the camera of the other aircraft just didn't see the object? As expected if I'm right.

Also, I don't know what they saw on the radar, but from my experience, especially in a sea environment, radars have LOT of false alerts for many things - Bird bands, fish bands jumping out of the water, sea turtles and even just sea waves. I think that what you see in the infrared's camera screen is NOT what they saw on the radar.

I have no doubt a that what you see in this video is just a small insect walking on the camera's lens.

Your opinion please.