Jump to content

Clay Gillespie

Senior Members
  • Posts

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Clay Gillespie

  1. Hey Bookmark, I’ll tell you what I have in common with Einstein, I quit reading other people’s work.
  2. What do you think establishes the em spectrum, I’ll spell it out, the constant emanation of the sun. The earth is a light bulb nested within a light bulb. And yes it is well tested. And constant c is the conditions that exist within that bulb. Wrong answer on the sun, lights out when it goes boom.
  3. Of course I’ve consider composition. You think you know what’s below the suns atmosphere. It’s a violent constant electrical storm from a molten surface to filament like atmosphere. And thank God cause we could really use the light. Well that’s not my moon theory. Minuscule, really, there kind of big, I agree they could correspond to meteorite hits, see any? Yes I see the splatter pattern.
  4. Citations needed. O.K you can cite me. O.k up till now have classified this the vent in the picture below as a crater, but pay attention to the smooth basin and visible splatter. The images we have obtained from Mars support Ejection Theory. Now notice a secondary but smaller “crater” (Vent) formed under the same local conditions. O.k here the Zunil “Crater” (Mars) Pay attention to the splatter patter, lack of residual meteorite, and perturbance of the surrounding surface area. This could have only formed under molten conditions which is agree, I’m saying I can explain why we’re missing all those mysterious meteorites. Because Mars was ejected in a molten state from the Sun. Also note about the butterfly “crater” (Vent) the splatter is inconsistent with the supposed angle of impact. But consistent with a bubble perforation with this shape.
  5. Disprove what has you so worked up heckler. I’m sure the rules don’t say everything over Inow’s head is excluded.
  6. Can’t speak to the Physics? IPerson
  7. Can you add anything intelligent iPad? If you can’t prove or disprove don’t interject.
  8. O.k Janus, the speed of light would be a different constant in a different solar system. “The speed of light is relative to the force of ejection from the center of origin.” But that must be a stable emanation, like our sun, We Are In That Center Of Force. The lighter in your pocket ignited will create a nested center of force, that center of force will become bigger the father it is from the superior center of force. Simply put the lighter creates a circumference of force, a nested center of force, the further away from the sun (Superior Center) that nested center (Inferior Center) is the greater the circumference of the Inferior center of force will be. Also realize this Janus, the laser example, is light traveling through light, the result is how fast does the power of that laser travel through the constant emanation of light from the sun. It would be different in a different solar system with a different sun, that had a different power of emanation.
  9. If we send a broadcast to every ship we have in space. Here’s the outcome I believe happens, minus out the here to there time of radio waves and the lights come on and are visible instantly. Put high speed cameras on every telescope involved, write down all Projected travel times of transmission and begin capturing images. Send the longest one first, shortest last, to synchronize them all to come on at once.So send 13 min then 11min then 6 min, so there is one event at T-0. What I predict will be seen is the recording of the same time frame on each camera for the visible appearance of light. The counter supposition is that the reverse order will present, 6 min later you’ll see 6, then 11 min later you’ll see 11, then 13 min later you’ll see 13. But this I contend with, I’m all in on the original proposition, Synchronized Illumination. Janus: We can measure the shadows of light from the sun and learn something, but we’re in the light bulb of the sun. We’re not in the light bulb we’re turning on.
  10. Here’s evidence, the picture shows a raised from the surface crater. That’s a vent that didn’t pop. By the laws of common sense you can’t say a meteorite hits the surface of the moon and causes a raise of the surface area simultaneously dispersing its mass into oblivion. The one on the left is raised the one on the right recessed. The picture of the asteroid has pops from a molten state ejection. The other picture is one of Saturns moons, I theorize it stopped ejecting material in the smooth regions. The pictures were obtained from google images.
  11. It took radio waves thirteen minutes. The telescope sees mars and our craft as it is now, not thirteen minutes in the past. That would mean Jupiter is 18 minutes and so on. Not the case.
  12. No, the light is already there. We can see the craft in a telescope. Not the craft 13 minutes ago.
  13. Thought Experiment - We sent a radio wave signal to a craft we have launched that is near Mars that takes 13 minute to be received telling the craft to turn on a light. How much longer then 13 minutes does it take us to see the light?
  14. Evidence is where the moon, with no significant atmosphere has no trace of meteorites that are all perfectly round and leave flat bottoms, with no angular hits and large areas of the seas being completely missed by mysterious meteorites, or it arrived there by a forming magnetic relationship with the earth, took place molten and those are gas vents or in the case of visible splatter substance vents. The below picture is of a “crater” (Gas vent) that formed while the surface was still molten from ejection from the sun. Note that’s stone. The other is classified as a crater because there is no molten activity.
  15. One is Ejection Theory, that the Earth was ejected from the sun. Two is Deflation Theory, that the moon was ejected from the earth shortly after the earth was ejected from the sun. These theories discredit Ram Pressure Theory by reframing crater impacts as gas and/or substance vents resulting from initial conditions of a molten state. Ejection Theory applies to all heavenly bodies as having their place in the Solar System as the result of ejection including asteroids, and showing the pop marks on planets and asteroids as the venting of gases and substances in the case of visible splatter. Ejection Theory further states that molten planetary ejection into the conditions of space precipitated the lunar ejection of the observed moons. Ejection Theory frames the moon as being like a musket ball removed from a forge.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.