Clay Gillespie

Moderator alert.

Jesus is standing on the eclipsed side of the earth noticing spin talking to mom.

I mean can disagree with that?

She’s got her arm around Einstein and he’s taking pictures of the eclipse.

I do believe you Mordred.

"As a good christian, I'm always going to disagree with any proof you try to give me." -Peter BE cimp

on a scale from one to 10, how meaningful is this quote to you?

My old friend, how you doin.

Jesus guys, this can work both ways.

Living breathing human being here, not an evidence machine. Got something insightful to throw out, It’ll give us a context to work from. I mean, prove what, Jesus loves you, gum drops should cost a dollar fifty.

By principle of conservation of energy.

Back from where, you didn’t imagine did you.

It admits itself to easy investigation. This is what we already know, these are more like tenets.

“Imagination is more important than knowledge.” Einstein

What do you think Einstein realized about light bending around the moon?

I’m thinking it rushes to the lowest pressure area.

But like a cast shadow it will never be full measure.

But spin...

Any imperfection in circlitude would determine (initial) spin.

Nested Centers of Force and Time Space Fabric

The time space fabric surrounding each planet orbiting the sun represents the local conditions of the fluid dynamics of the larger Superior center of force and the local pressure surrounding the Inferior center of force. Nested centers of force theory states each Inferior center of force will have spin equal to its constant emanation measurement. It’s C.E.M, or the total amount of light emanated from the Inferior, nested, center of force. “Because the constant emanation of the Superior center of force originates from the center of the overall gravitational field the pressure on the area that keeps the center of the Superior center of force in shadow, eclipses the Superior center of force from an observer position of a straight line trough both the Superior and Inferior Centers, will be lowest and constitute the orbital equator of the Inferior center of force unless acted upon by other forces.”

This theory likens our solar system to a light bulb with the sun being as the constant emittence of a filament and frames the Earth as a light bulb within a light, having itself a measure of constant emanation of light as well as capacity to store absorbed light from the sun. Additionally the theory frames thought to show that every heavenly body capable of producing light has atmosphere, and those objects incapable of constant light eminence have no atmosphere. 

This theory explains that the heavenly body that enfolds a secondary heavenly body within its circumference of constant emanation has gravity over that now orbiting satellite. Here you can imagine a bubble pushing into the outer layer of a larger bubble and for a short while sharing a part of their circumference with each other until the smaller has become whole yet inside the larger. At this point the internal dynamics of the larger center of force will prescribe the orbital path of the inferior center of force.

Close it, won’t my time.

O.k that’s good but I hope your realizing of the difference between an event and a constant emanation.

Wow the moderator just closed the other post I had, said I can’t bring up Ejection Theory or Deflation Theory, going to be hard it ties into this one, by the way I call it Porch Light Theory.

How many times have you reread that axiom.

Calm down, how many times.

That’s my writing on the fly, why would I read the congested blather of your recommendation.

That’s a contention.

How many times did you read the laser one.

Over five times.

Well things like that you want to take a few days with.

How long have you been on this post?

How many times have you read my posts?

Simple question Doctor.

12 minutes ago, Mordred said:

I think you had better start reading other people's work as you evidently have little understanding of any current research into the properties of light and of GR.

 In point of detail it was Einstein's work itself that shows the speed limit of information exchange. 

You haven't proposed anything with any possible validity. The speed of light and information exchange has over 100 years of tests performed to validate the speed limit

You still haven’t directly contented anything I’ve said, your merely emboldened by the moderator.

You haven’t contended anything. That’s a declaration.

For people so beholden to scientific decorum you awfully light on substantive points. Make a supposition beyond a quip and I’ll counter.

Make a direct contention, I’ll counter.

The common sense just keeps coming. My writing is both a scientific reference and evidence, and I’ve seen one or two near peers.

You know I don’t believe in early or late bombardment. Form a question that supposes something.

Ok I got the point, literally. So who are you for, the magic water bringing meteorite people, or water as the result of a molten state directly following ejection. The oil is the decomposition of a period of life carried below the surface by, I don’t know rain water, than sealing itself most times in high pressure caverns that I don’t know geyser. Or for the oil is the result of the initial conditions of a molten planet directly following a solar planetary ejection. 

If it’s the magic meteorite people your missing the strength of Ejection Theory, it’s universal in scope. How big did you say those suns at the center are, maybe a better question were.

9 hours ago, Clay Gillespie said:

 Citations needed. O.K you can cite me.

O.k up till now have classified this the vent in the picture below as a crater, but pay attention to the smooth basin and visible splatter. The images we have obtained from Mars support Ejection Theory. Now notice a secondary but smaller “crater” (Vent) formed under the same local conditions.

O.k here the Zunil “Crater” (Mars) Pay attention to the splatter patter, lack of residual meteorite, and perturbance of the surrounding surface area. This could have only formed under molten conditions which is agree, I’m saying I can explain why we’re missing all those mysterious meteorites. Because Mars was ejected in a molten state from the Sun.

Also note about the butterfly “crater” (Vent) the splatter is inconsistent with the supposed angle of impact. But consistent with a bubble perforation with this shape.

Now I’ll go a step further here, at the angle this mystery meteorite is reported to have hit at it would not be subject to the far fetched ideas surrounding Ram pressure, so where’s the meteorite?

They always hit straight on, in disappearing meteorite land. Well don’t you think that’s odd. I mean what are the odds. They all round back there in magical meteorite time.

And what this grouping of, I can barely write it “raised impact craters” 

Now you better start citing, because it’s a hell of a lot of he said she said to dispel what directly presents to common sense.

Now ask yourself what’s missing from the above picture. Impact craters that create depth, so that if you wanted to explain away the above picture by volcanic activity, you still need to answer why there are no, depressed impact craters caused by non volcanic activity.

You can site me there, buddy boy.

If you want to know more about it, right click it, or hold your finger on it, and use the, search google for this image, option.

Hey bubby boy, those pictures are the evidence, not siting anyone else here dim wit, I’m proving My theories, not a list of he said she said. Now if your interested in angular hits formulate a reasonable position.

Hey Bookmark, I’ll tell you what I have in common with Einstein, I quit reading other people’s work.