polis.aniftos@gmail.com

On 8/17/2019 at 9:58 PM, Ghideon said:

In addition to what @Strange wrote; your definition looks circular. As far as I know motion, in physics*, is the change in position of an object with respect to its surroundings in a given interval of time. How do you define motion to be able to define time to be dependent on motion?

 

*) paraphrase of wikipedia/Motion 

 

 

indeed, if we assume that time can be surpassed as a finite value ( of not a dimensional essence, or without any restricting boundary as the speed of light is) or it can be reversed in direction of manifestation in nature, or reversed in memory storage or retrieval by human beings, i.e. the way we remember and retrieve our memories, or man-made machines, eg. video reverse play, then it can be quantified and be depended on motion if you use the newtonian motion laws. these may sound physics of insanity but when we will be merging Virtual reality with Natural reality we will have to deal with such issues in medicine, in technology and eventually in everyday life... 

8 hours ago, DimaMazin said:

t = ((dx)²/c²+q²)^1/2

t is time

dx is quantity of motion

c is velocity of light

q is quantity of counteraction of forces to motion

q = t'  for traveling object

q is temporal inertia in an expanding universe where time is the expansion of space (suggestion based according to the above formula if we multiply and divide the right part by x)