Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

MarkPM's Achievements


Lepton (1/13)



  1. I don’t want to turn this into a tit for tat discussion about the emotional subjectiveness that pollutes science. I accept we are all human and being human myself, Id just like to point out that if there has been no mockery here and the emotional risk is all mine then Bruce Springsteen must be an amazing physicist? I can do sarcasm too but that’s not science! I don enjoy the banter but I’d like to stick to the issue at hand, my theory is most likely flawed, i accept the odds, can we put our egos aside and point me in the right direction? It’s clear that this isn’t the place developers come to look for ideas to invest in. Is there a place people that people can connect with potential investors that would suit my situation? I’d just like to add here that starlight was invented by a hair dresser, if that innovation was genuinely revolutionary then that idea died with that man for much the same issue I’m facing here.
  2. The problem with science is scientists, emotion creeps in and blurs true observation, thank you for all your emotive responses, mocking me is less productive than what I’m doing. Yes the thought crossed my mind if it’s so simple why hasn’t anyone thought of it; it’s hard finding flawed theories on the internet people tend not to post them as much. Yes I don’t have a deep background in physics but I have studied physics at university level but definitely no expert. And yes I want someone to do all the hard work I make no secret about that mainly because things are a lot harder when you don’t know how to go about securing such an idea. The reality probably is that the idea is flawed, but if it’s not, I’d like some credit for thinking of it. Therefore, I’m just looking for someone to enter a confidentiality agreement to hear my idea in case it’s valid. There’s no point airing out in public as that would defeat the exclusivity would it not?
  3. I cant reveal much at all because the principal is quite simple. I understand that for every action there’s an opposite and equal reaction but all i can say is that if my hypothesis is correct then this law doesn’t apply. Its quite possible that my hypothesis is flawed in some way that I cant see, but I’m in the difficult position. If I’m right I’d need to protect my rights to the innovation but the only way i can find out if I’m right is to run it past someone who’d be able to determine if my hypothesis is sound. If I were to post it in an open forum it becomes public knowledge
  4. Hello All, I have an innovation that I’d like to patent. I believe I have conceptualised a reaction-less propulsion system that would run on electricity alone. My innovation is only in the hypothetical stage as I have no way of creating a working model. I am looking for an entrepreneur/developer to take my innovation from the hypothetical stage through to the patent stage. I would want to retain 100% ownership of the patent giving exclusive usage rights to the developer for only 1% of the gross revenue as royalty. I’m new to this forum and I apologise if this post is inappropriate for this section, I mean no disrespect to the forum. Please refer me to correct section if applicable. If anyone is interested in perusing this with me and willing to enter in to a confidentiality agreement to understand the concept, please do not hesitate to contact me.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.