hipster doofus

Nice try to discredit me, someone with a new idea. I'm now wondering if it is you doesn't know what superposition means. I'm pretty sure you have seen the double slit experiment?

A single particle goes through the double slit and interferes with itself (in wave format). While it's a wave ..it's in superposition, we can not see it.

I feel like you are trying to trap me. You and I both know when unobserved particles go through the double slit they produce interference ..meaning they are in wave format

my core is the double slit experiment. derive it from that

what is there to know? superposition is an unobserved/unmeasured particle

superposition

How do you write an equation for wave collapse? My claim doesn't require proof when every quantum experiment ever done has already proved it.

14 minutes ago, Strange said:

The wave equation describes properties in three dimensional space.

If it was really 3D ..don't you think we would be able to see it?

15 minutes ago, QuantumT said:

What do you think the Large Hadron Collider is measuring?

observed particles ..which are 3D

I hope you will feel ashamed if this idea takes hold and you were responsible closing this thread.

The wave collapses when we measure them. They hold their properties while in superposition, so what? You don't have proof of what dimension they are in when in that state.

I wonder what else only exists as math ..oh that's right, objects in superposition. 

Observation of Mass = 3D

I'm talking about something so obvious that I'm embarrassed for the human race to have only noticed it now. We can't see particles while in superposition and we can't know their position and momentum at the same time. This points directly to an object that is existing outside of our normal 3D view. We don't see objects other than 3D in the real world.

I'm not trying to discredit anything that has already been tested and proved (the true unifying theory won't do that either), except when deciding if something is 3D or not. I'm not certain QM is 2D ..it might be 0D for all I know ..it just can't be 3D.

Evidence that waves collapse?

They are 3D when we measure/observe ..not while they are in the superposition state. Their math might say they are always 3D ..but that's all they are during superposition ..math, saying they have a different dimensional number might explain why they are able to be in that state to begin with.

I see quantum weirdness as properties that can do superposition and entanglement. The other things Superfluidity / Superconductivity are just things that happen to occur at the quantum level. Observe and Measure are the same thing. I think the actual divide is due to the number of atoms bonded together that happens to be around the amount needed for us to see them. Objects we consider 3D are not in a superposition state. I wish I was smart enough to know how to write the equation to prove this.

The two sides of the coin run perfectly fine on their own. My point is that when we zoom into a large object, those atoms bonded together are not going to display quantum weirdness. If we separated a single atom from that object, I claim that atom has become 2D, but is 3D while we are observing it. So to unify, we can write an equation that says Relativity is 3D and QM is 2D or less.

Quantum field theory and Quantum Electrodynamics obviously haven't unified the two yet because we get guys like this still saying they are not unified, from a couple days ago (see the 3:10 mark) https://youtu.be/dW7J49UTns8?t=190