Atom22

Yes this is precisely my problem He starts with the false assumption that "the only explanation is that the universe is created from nothing" and then uses some pseudo-mathematical mumbo-jumbo to try to justify this. Would you rather prefer a universe that is created from something? If you do, you then have to face the infinite series of questions what created that, and what created that, ad infinitum So a universe created from nothing as a reasonable assumption. This is a view shared by many physicist including Lawrence Krauss

Did you check the part where he explains about what happened before the Big Bang?

Well the person wished to stay anonymous

I am also doubting the credibility of your review because even on wikipedia the quaternions have the same definition as in the paper

Gravity is not a physical quantity and certainly not length? The De Broglie wavelength / matter waves is the wave / particle duality of particles. That particles can have a wave aspect to them and waves can exhibit particle like properties... so the author is extending this view to planets and stars. The De Broglie wavelength (which has energy E=hf) of the planet As for equation 2, not making sense are you farmiliar with hyperreals? But what i found interesting is not the preliminary chapter about the definition of space but rather what the author said concerning what happened before the big bang I have no idea about this. A member sent me the link.

Atleast i didnt find anything wrong with the equations and reasoning... can you give examples of the mistakes you speak of or are you refering of typos?

The problem is that there are no "true" equations of time in both GR and QT to either discredit or support your answer...

A member recently showed me this paper published on HAL about quantum gravity and i cannot seem to find anything wrong with the equations and they are able to reproduce Newton Universal Gravitation and Einstein's Equations in the appropriate limits Here is the url of the paper: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01609542 Can someone show me anything ive missed (I know the paper has been peer reviewed but... if this theory is correct why isnt anybody talking about it.?)