MaximThibodeau

Sorry about how i draw my corner, that is not the point. So it will be more affordable to cut the engine around 0.8 ? If, like i am, i dont understand the Lorentz factor correctly, will I loose energy to continue with a thrust over that level ? Are thermodynamic laws, wrong ? The first law of thermodynamics is a version of the law of conservation of energy, adapted for thermodynamic systems. The law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system is constant; energy can be transformed from one form to another, but can be neither created nor destroyed. The first law is often formulated Will my space craft overheat to explosion ?

Will this concept do it ? With this as a circuit: you should notice that this circuit is the equivalent of an antenna.

Your not my friend anymore.

what will be the situation green or red ?

If, I do understand correctly, the rocket will still have a speed increase (1 g acceleration) forever, but will never achieve the light of speed in the earth referential, but the spacecraft will be going much faster than that in the "referential of his last state", if i can expressed myself like that. So the Lorentz factor is only good in another referential, and does not state on the maximum speed of an object ? Maybe, the Sum of all speed, as an integration of accelerated movement (related this its last step) at all time of an object will give a value superior to light speed? I am moving to Alpha Centauri star, i have an acceleration of 1g, will i achieve my trip with the standard cinematic equation: v*t + 1/2 a *t² ?

did you try with a computer algo., with going too large value and after making it smaller until it fit? because analytic function...

proper acceleration = the magnitude of the acceleration in the rest frame

It is in the rest frame, what about the rocket frame, again?

In the rocket referential, with constant acceleration or not?

The most important, is that you believe in yourself, about your theory, i need more, do you have a website? I dont know if it is legal in this forum? maybe in the user interface?

I went at "Université de Montreal" in mathematic, so i understand your point about eigenfunction, but my question is not answered: Do we lost kinetic energy while pushing more, when we are close to the light speed ?

1- x is a value to achieve the equation, i dont understand ? 2- so, what is happening to the acceleration, so the speed, when we are close to the speed of light, do we decelerate, with the gas pedal still pushed, in the rocket referential?

Should read: It came from me

Its clearly disrespectful, close this thread, sorry...

I came from me, but i wont argue again without anyone watching!

So now, with all those links remove, what still wrong? could i return to the main thread again

Sorry about my link, i did not know, but is this note is about the link of Einstein work too?

and about that?

Lets the future taking care of this...

4 minutes is not enough to have read it?

Lets take a look to my theory: link deleted

So i will, in my referential (rocket), go over the speed of light ? You cant get corrected, under the current theory, you are 100% right. That's my problem: unless, something, i don't understand, E <> Imaginery I took it from his own work: link deleted

What is happening to the quantity that is acceleration when the object is close to light speed ? I mean, why when we push on the acceleration pedal we actually slow down, close to light speed ?

Could someone explain me what is mean?