Spyroe Theory

Thanks, that helps clarify where you’re coming from. I’m not trying to redefine the Bohmian formalism or replace the quantum potential. I’m using informal language to ask a more basic question about interpretation. When I say “constraint,” I don’t mean a mechanical constraint like a rigid rod. I mean that the wavefunction already seems to shape what is allowed and what is forbidden before any measurement happens (for example, nodes where outcomes never appear). That feels more like a pre-existing structure than just a bookkeeping device. By “configuration space,” I was just pointing to the usual issue that the wavefunction lives somewhere different from the particle we observe, which is part of why people find the pilot wave ontologically strange. I agree Bohmian mechanics may not be the final story. My interest is whether its difficulties are a hint that the pilot wave is pointing toward a more intuitive underlying picture, rather than something that “acts but cannot be acted upon,” as Einstein worried.

In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the pilot wave guides particles but is usually treated as an abstract object in configuration space. I’m exploring whether the pilot wave can instead be understood as a real constraint structure that exists prior to measurement and determines what outcomes are possible. From this view: In the double-slit experiment, what passes through both slits is the constraint structure, not a particle. Interference arises from how these constraints overlap. Measurement corresponds to a selection (locking-in) of one allowed outcome, not the revelation of a pre-existing classical fact. My question: Is there any principled reason the pilot wave cannot be treated as a real physical or geometric constraint, rather than a purely mathematical guide?

Percepton theory is a concept that claims humans are biologically linked to a specific shape. Check out percepton theory on YouTube for videos. link deleted

What If You Shape the Universe? Have you ever wondered if the universe is watching us—or if we’re actually shaping it just by being here?

Anyone know if this propeller would actually work? When spinning up it would creat a vortex energy field that matches the universal field.

Peterkin. The top dogs do not allow good ideas to take over their own ideas. You may want to live in a reality that is just and fair but it’s not as u say here. And here you say the elders keep the young one in check. Exactly. The elders make sure the young ones only make progress in the elders theories and not their own new radical ideas no matter how good the ideas are. Again I’m going to say trust me, I know, I saw. Another point to make here is that physicists claim to have revealed nature as it is with their theories but the truth is they have figured out how to expose nature in one of the many ways it can reveal itself. So long as their sponsors make money from the theories technologies than why change anything. Why look for something better if what you have is working, unless the better idea is from the same group in charge, of course.

Swansont. Trust me and watch the video. Lee goes on for a while on the whole concept of quantum mechanics and How the Copenhagen interpretation is the prevailing philosophy in physics. He’s a realist and thinks the top physiatrist are lunatics. Not physiatrist I meant physicist. Bloody autocorrect. The lecture is “Einstein’s unfinished revolution”

This is not a conspiracy. Watch Lee smolins lecture at the perimeter institute one of the worlds top research lab, he’s a top physicist and he’s complaining about it. Why, cause he has a good idea for quantum gravity,”loop quantum gravity”. Probably is being ignored by the guys above him.

There are top physicists that have great ideas to progress scientific progress but are held back by the very top. The very top physicists choose to continuously pursue established but old theories mainly to their own benefit. Only when they die off will a whole new generation of physicists take over and pursue new ideas. In other words, the direction and pace of human evolution is controlled by very few people with a personal agenda.