kayzumfelde

"'You should know this. I don't know how many times I said this in my messages. One has to change back the pH of blood to its original value or range of values.' Plain wrong." Well, you just say what I say is "plain wrong" but you don't say, why that what I say is wrong? Another thing Can you name a source where it is written that people die f.e. on arthrosis because they followed a alkaline vegan diet? "You are ignoring the fact that the lungs and kidneys are part of the body and can control blood pH." If everything in the body is interrelated, that you seem now not deny anymore, than lungs and kidneys cannot control the pH of blood. They are part of the 'system' that can change, by interacting with the pH of blood, not by themselves alone, the latter. But only because of environment problems, extreme consumption of something like f.e. alcohol, or mutation of DNA. Well the mutation of DNA is a chemical process which is reversible. Mutation is a chemical process, because biology cannot explain it. "DNA repair is a collection of processes by which a cell identifies and corrects damage to the DNA molecules that encode its genome. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_repair Because biology cannot explain it is according to the hierarchy of the sciences of nature: The human body is explained by biology. If some parts cannot be explained by biology it needs to be explained by chemistry and if not by chemistry it needs to be explained by physics. That's because in the history of the big bang first physics appears then chemistry and then biology.

No I don't say, that the only thing that can change a person's illness is the pH of blood. Well, I say that the pH of blood has changed when a person becomes ill. And that illness can be caused f.e. by poisons, bacteria, viruses, clearly also alcohol and also eating wrong food for some time and then also the environment can be responsible. It can be taken months or even years until a chronic disease manifests. It's obvious that the pH of blood is incorporated, because as I say it again, blood is everywhere in the body, except in the corneal of the eye. You seem to ignore this and you also seem to ignore, that everything is interrelated in the human body. You should know this. I don't know how many times I said this in my messages. One has to change back the pH of blood to its original value or range of values. And in chronic diseases it is possible by following a well-adjusted vegan diet. Also a very positive attitude can help a lot, since so many chronic diseases seem to be psychosomatic. You seem to ignore that there must be some measure of the performance of f.e. an organ is taken by the pH. "Extremely high or low pH values generally result in complete loss of activity for most enzymes. pH is also a factor in the stability of enzymes. As with activity, for each enzyme there is also a region of pH optimal stability." http://www.worthington-biochem.com/introbiochem/effectsph.html This is not far away from the statement, that the pH is extremely important, not to say the most important measure in order to understand why the body works fine or not. And I believe you cannot deny that the pH's are interrelated or can you? And I didn't suffer from arthritis, I suffered from arthrosis.

I didn't talk about cyanide. As I said that food seems to change the pH of blood slightly. The pH of blood has to be relatively constant. And as I said in an earlier message: It seems to be different for every human beings. It needs to be between 7.35 and 7.45. So it can be that f.e. a specific human being needs to have a pH in blood around 7.42, and for another at 7.37. And that the vegan diet for example works in case of Venus Williams is not by coincidence. She is definitely not the only person where a vegan diet helped with respect to chronic diseases. I have only the German source in the case of arthrosis, but you may are able to translate the page: http://www.arthroseselbsthilfe.de/ I followed the tips on the site and spoke with some doctor who also suffered from arthrosis. She followed the alkaline vegan diet for some months in order to change her state. Myself I followed the alkaline vegan diet for several weeks. Then the arthrosis vanished. And I didn't change anything but food. I think I wrote this down several times. So, the first question is: how much does it change the pH of blood? And second: How slight is the change? That's, and I say it again, because blood is distributed to the whole body except the corneal eye.

Venus' problem as I said Sjögren's syndrome. This is an autoimmune disease and she doesn't change her life except for staying on a vegan diet: "I started for health reasons. I was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease, and I wanted to maintain my performance on the court. Once I started I fell in love with the concept of fueling your body in the best way possible. Not only does it help me on the court, but I feel like I’m doing the right thing for me." http://www.health.com/nutrition/venus-williams-raw-vegan-diet If this is not a proof, what else is then a proof. Well, if we stay with your example of an organ failure: Where does it come from? Just out of nowhere? There must be an influence from the environment or from consumption of something. And these influences change at the end the pH of blood.

Well I would like to know, what in your eyes is the active system, that 'measures' the pH of blood. I think with the active system measuring the pH you mean it controls the pH. Well all pH's, except that of the corneal eye, are interrelated and thus everything 'interact' with the blood pH, since as I say again, blood is everywhere except in the corneal of the eye. You have the problem that you don't see the body as being a whole system that works together. Of course it tries to keep the pH of blood at the same level, and buffering supports it, because it is essentially for staying alive, but: the pH of blood can get into trouble if f.e. an organ doesn't work properly anymore. It is out of the question that itself the pH of blood could also get into problems by the environment or by some food which is not the proper food anymore. That's because the work of the buffers could become to function not well anymore. See alcohol for example. Drinking too much alcohol leads to problems. And very often it takes some time in order to work not properly anymore. We are lucky that it is so, because if not we all would become ill all the time and humans would be extinct. Also specific medication can lead to trouble. And I think, since all humans are different, it depends on the specific human, if it gets into problems or not. And if you don't believe my case of arthrosis, haven't you red about Venus Williams as I suggested? Do you think she's lying? And I meant not vegetarian diet, I meant an alkaline, in my case, vegan diet. Also Venus Williams' diet is vegan.

I think, your problem is that you don't deny that pH's can change through their interrelation. I think you have a problem with the idea that food has a pH, or why can't you see that the pH's of everything in the body whether it is consumed or not is interrelated. I don't deny that the changes of pH's in blood are slight, but that seems to be enough as many examples have been shown, including that of arthrosis in my body or that of Venus Williams who suffered from an autoimmune disease, the Sjögren's syndrome: I said that it could take some time until the pH's change which is a result of buffering.

The main problem in schizophrenia from a psychological point of view is the lack of trust in others. At the beginning I didn’t believe that I was ill. That’s very common to schizophrenic people. So this was the first thing why I didn’t trust the psychiatrists. My first psychiatrist, who I met when I left the hospital, said I can work eight hours per day. I knew that this was impossible with the dose of Haldol I got. But I wasn’t telling him that, because I got the feeling that it wouldn’t change anything. However I was also been so overdosed that I wasn’t able to concentrate more than a few minutes. Again I wasn’t able to tell this the psychiatrist. I didn’t trust him. I changed the psychiatrist. I was able to tell the second psychiatrist that I had problems with Haldol. She said that we could try another medication. I didn’t trust her, that it could be better. What did I really feared? I wasn’t sure about this for a long time. At the beginning it was the fact, that I couldn’t do my work; that I couldn’t live a normal life. The fears changed while living my life. In 1995 I started to work under the influence of a new not so high dosed medication. The fears became more and more existential when I started working again. First they only appeared as something that I defined as a ‘crisis.’ A crisis? Yes, I couldn’t identify fears as fears. When the crisis appeared I was in a state in which I wasn’t able to act in any way. Thus I have put myself into bed. I waited until the fears disappeared. That could take awhile. Usually at the beginning a few hours. My new psychiatrist said that she can solve the problem within ten years. For me ten years was an infinite time period. With the statement that ‘problem’ will be solved she meant that schizophrenia would be gone. But the real problems behind all this are fears, fears that are not visible to people who don’t suffer from schizophrenia. During a psychosis delusion of grandeur or paranoia for example are based on fears. Why is a delusion of grandeur based on fears? In my case I thought I was the most intelligent person in the world. The fear arises because you fear that something would happen to you if you are not so high intelligent. You fear that if you are not high intelligent society wouldn’t love you. Moreover, that you for example cannot say or do what you like, because you think for example Einstein was able to say or do whatever he wanted or liked. Paranoia is another form of delusion based on the fear that someone is after you and wants to do something bad to you. You think you cannot escape something really bad. You don’t trust nearly anybody. I trusted only the stars in Hollywood, but I have had no connection to them. If you are taking your medication these fears and delusions are covered by the medication. That means they are still there, but the medication just calm your fears down. The big question is: How can the fears disappear? In order to get rid of the fears, you need to trust people. You need to find people who are not cynical. Usually you can trust your therapist or psychiatrist. Why? Because people get help from her/him. It’s their job to help you. On the other hand, if you don’t trust her/him because of reasons you cannot explain don’t hesitate to change her/him. It could take some time until you find a therapist with whom you have or can build up a fruitful connection. I started to tell my new therapist in 1995 some basics about myself. Usually you go through hard times when you open your heart more and more to the therapist, because you think the person you already started to trust can work against you. This is from your point of view logical, since you may haven’t trust anyone before. During the psychosis you got to the idea that people didn’t really help you. You think you could loose this person. For example, you think you can loose the contact to the therapist, when you have a dispute with her/him. You need to learn that this is usually not the case. Disputes can be a common thing within relationships. Some people argue less some more, but it is likely that you have disputes. Usually after some time the actual dispute evaporates. If not, something is really wrong. You should avoid cynical people. Those are in general people that discriminate or judge you and who are selfish and/or dishonest. I discussed in this post how to find out who is cynical. Everyone usually has sometimes setbacks while getting to know new people. For schizophrenic people this is an even more sensitive issue. If you are schizophrenic it is dangerous to be too open too soon. This is only possible if you are strong enough to do so. Don’t worry too much about what I said, because your intuitive inner voice will tell you what do to. To really trust someone, you need to trust yourself first. If you don’t start trusting someone you will not solve your problems. Trusting someone means, that you risk something. You risk to be disappointed by that other person. So at the beginning you should not invest too much. By investing too much I mean you should not invest too many feelings. Is that true? Is it possible to invest not too many feelings? It depends what do you feel for this other person. If you are instantly fell in love with this person, than how can you not start to invest a lot feelings into that person? That’s life. And can you always be sure that you won’t be disappointed? Can you see always through this person soon to find out if this person really loves you? At the beginning you will be probably very enthusiastic. ‘Love makes you blind.’ At the beginning this could be the case. You will find out, when you listen to you inner voice, your intuition, your heart. You will find out, if this other person loves you, if you want her/him as your life partner or if she/he really likes you. Listen to what she/he says, what she/he does and check how you feel about these statements and actions. Don’t worry you are no sociopath if many people you get to know aren’t falling into the category close friend or even possible life partner. It’s not common that one has many close friends. But you should feel comfortable around the people that you meet in daily life to stay healthy. Back to the fears that are essential during medication. These are existential fears. Fears like not having enough money to live from. The fear that I could be dying in an accident while walking down the street. The fear that the bridge I am walking through could break down when I was actually walking across. A person in a sane state wouldn’t usually thinking about this, maybe only if it came up in the news channel. How to get rid of such fears? By becoming aware about what you really fear and making yourself clear, that the actual incident is not very likely to happen. How can this be helpful? It makes you feel comfortable. You loose your fears if such facts like the non-likeliness of the bridge breaking down enter your consciousness. Also what was very important to me to get rid of the fears was the fact finding out, with the help of a friend, that I have a purpose in life; that there is something of value what I can contribute to society. That was even the biggest insight for me. Yet, I didn’t really understand why this makes me feel so good, but I found out it is the feeling of positive self-worthiness that put me on track; the faith that what I write down and what I communicate to other people is giving only myself but also them a good feeling. The mechanism, how the fears disappeared, is not quite clear to me yet. Time is a factor, since as time moves on I became somehow more convinced that everything will turn out fine. Also nothing seriously bad happened which improved my positive self-worthiness and someday back in October 2016 the fears finally vanished.

Didn't you see this: "There is some evidence that the gut may modulate systemic acidosis in experimental endotoxemia by removing anions from the plasma [35]. The full capacity of this organ to affect acid–base balance is unknown, however." That means the effect of the gut is unknown. Thus there's needed additional research to find out the connection between the gut and other systems of the body and "there is some evidence that the gut may modulate systemic acidosis in experimental endotoxemia by removing anions from the (blood-) plasma." Removing anions from the blood plasma. Thus a change in the pH of blood!

I cannot be wrong. It is simple biochemistry and chemistry that solutions are interconnected within the body. Can't you see that the gut is connected to the blood stream. Now I found some source that research is now going into the correct direction. "There is some evidence that the gut may modulate systemic acidosis in experimental endotoxemia by removing anions from the plasma [35]. The full capacity of this organ to affect acid–base balance is unknown, however." See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137247/

Well, as I tried to make clear, food changes the pH level of the acid. Because the pH values in all regions of the body are different and they are interrelated. That means they are connected. Thus the pH of blood changes too. What's so difficult understanding this? Of course problems usually don't arise especially because of the buffering system. But when they arise it must have to do with pH value. That's because every chemical compound influences the pH value. That's because food has a pH value, since it is a chemical compound. That are basics of chemistry.

In 2015 I was diagnosed with arthrosis in my left food. I was already a vegetarian. I didn't want to take medication against pain. I googled for a self-help group. There was coming up some German group, and it leads to a site where that Fisseler was presenting his book about arthrosis based on the ideas by Prof Dr. med Lothar Wendt. According to his theory arthrosis is based on an acidity/base imbalance of the human body. The body was becoming acidic. The book gives a recommendation to eat fruits and vegetables that are leading back to a alkalic state. I called some woman who posted on the homepage of the self-help group, that this diet helped her. She's a doctor. Then I started with this diet and after 6 or 8 weeks the pain was gone. Now I eat sometimes eggs or cheese. When I eat too much the pain comes back. The idea that it changes the pH of blood came up afterwards not a long time ago. I don't deny that the change is only slightly, but it hasn't been undertaken research if this causes problems. And also it wasn't considered, as far as of my knowledge that everyone has a specific range of pH blood which is healthy for her/him. I think there should be done research.

You say I am wrong because you say so. You give no proofs for this. Just that mainstream says so. I have given the logical conclusions why my theory can be right. The basics which are building my theory are biology, biochemistry and chemistry and not medicine. Especially biochemistry is interesting. Blood runs everywhere around everywhere in the body, except the corneal eye. That's a fact. I say it again. And the pH value is influenced by for example alcohol and this can lead to serious issues. And food is made of chemical compounds which are dissociated in the body. Thus the pH value of blood and these of other regions are interconnected. That means they are influencing each other. That's all (bio-)chemistry and thus well accepted, right?

Mainstream is not always right. Can you explain why I have no problems anymore staying on a alkalic vegan diet? Because mainstream medicine says that is right or wrong because of this or that doesn't mean it is the truth. And medicine is no real science, since every fact in medicine is based on statistics. Statistics is subjective. That's a mathematical fact. Read E. T. Jaynes: "Probability Theory". That is a well accepted text book on statistics. Biochemistry is a real science, like chemistry or physics.

Well, buffering cannot be extended to the infinite. It's only a factor 20, f.e. if considering bicarbonate/carbon acid. That you can proof that by googling for it. And metabolism is influencing everything also pH of blood. And the pH of blood is essentiell for the health of the body. We are clear of that, or aren't we? Because I am the only one who is supporting my point of view, doesn't mean that I have to be the only one who needs to proof his point of view. You have also to proof what you say. You only come up lately with suggestions. Those suggestions can be only true by coincidence. They have no logical basis.

Well, can you disproof that the pH value of blood isn't changed by f.e. alcohol? Why doesn't food change the pH of blood? Can you explain this? Does in your theory the pH of any organ or region of the body changes, if you for example drink too much? If you say it doesn't, than why not? And the experience of many people, including myself, who experienced that arthrosis is gone by staying on a alkalic vegan diet is not an evidence that the body was before in a wrong condition regarding the pH value of blood. What else could it be? What do you mean by real data then?

Well, I have heard a lot about the so-called genetic predisposition or vulnerability. It is an assumption which some or many psychiatrists and psychotherapists say is the cause for schizophrenia. But there's no evidence for this. And that schizophrenia appears in more than one of families members can be explained in other ways than genetic predisposition, namely by the behavior that the parents or other family members induce on their children, cousins etc. My 'father' was not my biological father. My mother didn't know how to handle me, so I was always an outsider, which is, as I believe is one cause for the problem. The other main problem was that I was lacking self-worthiness. As an outsider you have difficulties to trust others. I didn't know that until I started to trust some people. That took a long time. Yes, I still take medication, but it is going to be reduced continuously. The experiences of the psychosis' phases appear as memories, but I can decide what is reality and what is a delusion. All my symptoms which were under medication still present somehow by experiencing irrational fears and sometimes short impressions of delusions were finally gone in October 2016. Especially the irrational fears and the paranoia were hard to defeat but they are gone. My psychiatrist says, that she doesn't believe that I stay healthy without medication. That's because she believes in genetic predisposition. And no, to my knowledge there were no members in my family who became ill of schizophrenia. I cannot say for sure for my fathers family.

Well, I don't think this is wild guessing. It's a proposition. Evidence can only come up with a hypothesis and an experimental proof or disproof. There's no proof and no disproof as of my knowledge. Scientists make very often propositions and I hope we can discuss it here. A fruitful discussion would be happen, if someone says why he thinks that it can be true and some other says it cannot. I started raising some questions about a possible relation between the structure of the DNA and its relation to the pH value. Since the pH value is a direct consequence of the hydrogen ion concentration there could be some affinity to the DNA structure, because the physical structure of the DNA can depend on the pH value of the blood. The discussion should lead to the theoretical ideas why or why not this can or can't be true. That's how theoretical science works. Also experiments need to be done to support the different hypotheses.

Well, the healthy pH range is between 7.35 and 7.45. That's correct. But every individual has its own range within the range of 7.35 and 7.45 and why can't it be between 7.35 and 7.36 for some specific individual and for another between 7.42 and 7.44. That's what I propose. That's a proposition and it is not disproved. And my own experience is that I was diagnosed with arthrosis and that was gone after several weeks, and I am not the only one who experienced this. I know that most physicians doesn't believe it, but who says that the majority is always right? You cannot say that what I say is all wrong. You have no proof for this. The problem with 'chronic' diseases is that usually they appear some time in life and no one seems to know why is that. A specific environment and wrong food are possible reasons which are influencing it. Genetic mutation? But what is the cause for this?

You may wonder, if I really found the source of this mental illness. I found it at least in my case, because this was the door to recover from schizophrenia. I found the solution to the basic problem which I discovered also in two other guys who are still mentally ill. The way to the solution of my case was long with many setbacks. However, I didn’t give up. To find the source at least in my case I needed to reconstruct what was happened at the start of the mental illness. The problems started back in 1990/91. I don’t want to tell you the whole story. I remember that I started to isolate me from society. I did this because I felt guilty about something that was not my fault. It was nobody’s fault. In 1989 I fell in love with a woman who as I later found out was only attracted to me, because I was good looking and intelligent. No real feelings as I found out over the time. How could I fell so guilty that I become schizophrenic because I was falling in love? You need to know, that this woman had another boyfriend. She didn’t told me this. I found it out by chance. And Later, I felt guilty, because I didn’t simply immediately quit this relationship. I started feeling guilty when the relationship became complicated after some time. I thought the society wasn’t accepting me anymore because of this story. I isolated me from society by stop talking with my friends and quitting my new job at the University. Why was I isolating myself and why I felt guilty about continuing that relationship? The reason is a non-existence of self-worthiness. What is self-worthiness? Putting it simple: You are self-worthy if you think you are of value to someone to your family or to your society. If you feel you are a waster for society, no positive self-worthiness simply doesn’t exist. If I look back I felt like an outsider for a long long time. I had no self-worthiness because I thought everything I do was like a sisyphus work. I tried something but it had no positive outcome. That wasn’t really true, but my imagination was like that. I didn’t analyse the situation. At the beginning, when I was a teenager or when I was in my twenties only my subconsciousness has observed what was right and what was wrong. Many times I decided according to my moral values but only intuitively. I tried to integrate myself into different sub-societies but it didn’t really work out. I tried many sub-societies, but I found myself left in the rain. Well, you may argue that I didn’t try enough to get into one of one of those sub-societies. That’s true, but I didn’t feel right inside any of these past sub-societies. Why was this the case? I didn’t feel supported or loved around these people. That doesn’t mean I haven’t had any friends. But those friends were only a few and the sub-society associated with them hadn’t a positive attitude. So, question is how can you avoid becoming mentally ill? You need to have a positive self-worthiness. This is only possible if you are supported and accepted by the sub-society you live in. Well the sub-society you should be firstly accepted and supported is your family. If you aren’t accepted and supported by your family then the problem of negative self-worthiness can become serious sooner or later. That’s because you become an outsider within your own family. If you furthermore don’t have friends who support and love you, it could happen that the whole problem can rise more and more until it ‘implodes’ with the result: Mental illness. Why did I write ‘it could happen?’ In my case, if I felt in love with a caring, supportive and lovely woman, I believe the schizophrenia hasn’t occurred. On the other hand, my first therapist said several times, she thinks that I must attract such a woman. That leads me to something that I wrote on another post with the title: ‘Is the world cynical?’ You need to assure that your partner is not cynical to build up a supportive, lovely and joyful partnership. My therapist thus seemed to be convinced that I wasn’t able to distinguish between a good and a cynical person. She was backing this idea up with an example. Specific women who have several partners in her life who have in common, that they are addicted to alcohol. Why was I attracting women, who thought I was only good looking and intelligent? Was I selfish, dishonest, judging and discriminating people? Sometimes I was, in order to make others loving me what didn't work. But I didn’t believe these steps by myself were obvious. And this cynical parts of me didn’t cross my consciousness until I thought about it deeper. To avoid attracting cynical people you yourself need to behave good and not cynical. But you have to learn this. For this you have to decide what is right and what is wrong. You need to listen to your mind and heart and decide whether an action of someone is right or wrong. To defend what you think is right and what is wrong you need to be at least sometimes brave. This is not easy, because sometimes you feel pressure for example from your sub-society. Then you have to convince them from your opinion. If this is not possible or if you are not accepted and respected, then something with you or your sub-society is wrong. Back to the negative self-worthiness. If you think you are a waster, then you will think that what you think is right was let’s say not enough to become accepted and respected. I understood that only many years later, not such a long time ago. You may have red that often a psychosis arises if you are becoming an adult. This seems to be true and is not in contraction to my observations. If you have a negative self-worthiness you could think you are a waster or outsider and if performance is demanded by your boss you can therefore run into a psychosis. That could be happen because if you think you are a waster you don't believe you ever get accepted. And also you may are not able to distinguish the right people from the wrong ones.

No, I am sorry, there are no publications as far as I know of. My post is a proposition. One needs to undertake research on this issue.

Not every vegan food you eat is forming automatically an alkaline blood pH. That is true. You need to look for food, which results in an alkaline pH value of the blood. And there are lists on the net. For example pasta is not an alkaline producing food, but potatoes is. And there is still food where is no common sense if it is producing an alkaline pH value. But fruits f.e. is an excellent example of producing a change of the pH value into the correct direction. I've only a German source in case of arthrosis but it should be applicable to other problems too. That book is written by Eckhard K. Fisseler: "Arthrose - Der Weg zur Selbstheilung" (Hans Nietsch-Verlag). The problem of arthrosis is according to Prof. Dr. med. Lothar Wendt caused by an acidity of the human body. Because the blood is nearly reaching everywhere in the body except the corneal of the human eye, it is going to be affected. It seems so that slight changes of the pH value of blood are causing f.e. arthrosis or as I propose other 'chronic' diseases too. To evaluate the exact circumstances there should be undertaken research in that direction. Remember I am not the only one who applied the alkaline vegan diet and whose pain is gone.

The factor 20:1, I found on a link in the internet. It represents the carbon acid/bicarbonate buffer. And if you don't like the equation H++OH-<-H2O, I come up with the organic chemistry equation: carbon acid + alcohol<-ester + water. The sign <- indicates a heavy use of alcohol. The pH value in blood decides what happens to the body. That's a proposition. It needs to be done experimental research on this. However I can come up with an example regarding my own health. Some time ago I was diagnosed with an arthrosis. I found a German resource which said that arthrosis is a product of over acidity. So I started with an alkaline vegan diet and after some weeks the pain started to disappear. Soon the pain vanished. Some other people reported, that it took them month or a year until the pain vanished but it did.

Okay, my fault. Thus 6x10^15.65-6x10^15.55=6x10^15x10^0.65-6x10^15x10^0.55=0.03x10^17 including the buffer system, which gives a factor of 20 it gives 6x10^16. That's the hydrogen ion number of water which is 6x10^23-7=6x10^16 hydrogen ions per litre. Now the system needs indeed a lot of alcohol to become destabilised, since H++OH-<-H2O, if alcohol is added. However the pH value of blood needs not to be stressed that much. The same is it with when you eat too much acid producing food.

I've calculated more precisely. The difference between pH 7.36 -7.35 compared with the pH of water is around 1,200,000 hydrogen ions (including the buffer system) per litre. That's compared to the number of hydrogen ions in water, which is 4.2x10^20 not that a big number. I would say, that the system is still sensitive to the pH of blood. One mol is 6x10^23 atoms or molecules, i thought.

I've posted again my new post, where I make an attempt to explain why the pH value of the human body is so sensitive. Why can't I show experimental evidence yet? Because no one was experimentally doing research on this! But if you calculate the difference of the hydrogen ions per litre between pH 7.35 and pH 7.45 you come to the fact that it is including the bicarbonate/carbon acid buffer, which provides a 20:1 range, 400 hydrogen ions per litre. That's nothing! So the pH value plays an important role in the function of the body. There might be something else, besides the buffer mechanism, which is influencing the pH value? So, what is it? This needs further research! The difference between pH 7.35 and 7.36 is 7.36x6x10^23-7.35x6x10^23=44.16x10^23-44.1x10^23=0.06x10^23=6x10^21. Well, my error. Sorry. I've to think further on this.