Jump to content

Jean-Yves BOULAY

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jean-Yves BOULAY

  1. Scientific research is not limited to publications in journals. I believe you have not read the article because you will find in it that all the data is correct. And now that this post is in the speculation category what's stopping debating it. (also, publishing in journals is very tedious, have you tested ...)
  2. If this is numerology, then so is the Periodic Table of Elements! The first two primes for example. and 2 + 3 = the 3th prime. Just 5 is sum of two consecutive primes. Have you a published paper for give lesson?
  3. When I show that the components are in opposition of the arithmetic 3/2 ratio, there is nothing speculative about it! What is there speculative in this representation?
  4. This study describes the real structure of the atomic components working in the genetic code. Everything that is presented there is completely correct. This post did not have to be moved to the "speculations" section but was in its place in biochemistry and molecular biology! This post is unfairly placed in speculation. Please let me know what information is wrong or not verified in this article.
  5. The analysis of the quantum structure of the five atomic elements composing the coded twenty amino acids and the four coding nucleotides of DNA working in the organization of the genetic code reveals an opposition of their respective constituents in always an arithmetic ratio of value 3/2 according to the parity of the number of their quantum shells. Also, the quantum analysis of the amino acid Glycine, the smallest component of peptides that can be confused with saturated base, reveals the same arithmetic oppositions of 3/2 value of its components by the differentiation, operated according to their number of protons, of its five chemical groups. Genetic code, quantum physics and the 3/2 ratio Quantum analysis of the atoms constituting the genetic code Jean-Yves BOULAY Genetic code quantum analysis.pdf Within the mechanism of the genetic code and therefore among the twenty amino acids, Glycine is distinguished by its absence of radical. Its radical is reduced to a simple hydrogen atom which in a way simply closes the "base" structure common to each amino acid. The quantum study of this glycined base, identifying with Glycine, reveals singular arithmetic arrangements of its different components. New quantum chart This quantum study of the genetic code is an opportunity to propose a new type of table describing the quantum organization of atoms. In this chart, illustrated in Figure 5, the different quantum shells and subshells are presented in the form of chevrons. At the top end of each rafter are indicated the names of the different shells and subsells; at the left end of these chevrons, the numbers of orbitals and electrons of these different shells and quantum subshells are indicated. At each chevron vertex is the orbital where the quantum number m = 0. The orbitals with positive quantum number m are progressively positioned towards the top of these chevron vertices and the orbitals with negative quantum number m are progressively positioned towards the outside left of these chevron vertices. In the appendix, the same type of table is presented describing the quantum organization of the shells and subshells up to the 5th shell (O) and 15th subshell (5g). This innovative presentation, more explicit in describing the quantum structure of the atomic elements, will be used in various tables of this quantum study of the constituents of the genetic code.
  6. Initial arithmetic arrangements in 3/2 ratios inside hierarchical classification of whole numbers. From the new paper:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341787835_New_Whole_Numbers_Classification
  7. Inclusive diagram of the new whole numbers classification.
  8. I obviously encourage anyone to explore further beyond. My article is only the beginning in this way and I work myself (and I have already discovered) on other phenomena including especially with the concept of Sophie Germain numbers.
  9. In my introductions and conclusions I insist that these phenomena are related to the decimal system and therefore to small closed matrices of 5x or 10x entities. This is the basis of the article which does not study long sequences but their start (in multiples of 10 or 5).
  10. I have worked on other matrices but there are more significant results with matrices to 10 by 10. But see above there is also with 5 by 5. "so-called, "thus-called" these grammatical problems are secondary.
  11. The association of the numbers 0 and 1 with the primes, then the distinction of 4 classes of numbers, allows many arithmetic singularities. 3/2 ratio, this term appears hundreds of times in this article! It is always involved between and in sets of entities of 5x sizes (so 3x + 2x) including, in most situations, various matrices of ten by ten entities. These arithmetic phenomena demonstrate the equality of importance of the different types of entities studied as the ultimates or non-ultimates, the primordials or non-primordials, the digit numbers or non-digit numbers among the fundamentals, the numbers of extreme classes and those of median classes, fertile or sterile numbers, etc. . Thus is revealed in this article quantity of dualities distinguishing whole numbers in always pairs of subsets opposing in various ratios of exact value 3/2 or, more incidentally, of exact value 1/1. Also, many of the phenomena presented, in addition to involving this arithmetic ratio of 3/2, revolve around the remarkable identity (a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2 where a and b have the values 3 and 2. This generates many entanglement in the arithmetic arrangements operating between the different entities considered and therefore strengthens their credibility by the dimensional amplification of these arithmetic phenomena.
  12. Please, sorry to repeat again and again: read the entire article carefully.
  13. When I said: 0, 1 and all primes not admit any non-trivial divisor (whole number) being less than them. Why are You so afraid of this? So also answer this question: is it right or not? If this is true then the whole numbers divides well into two groups: ultimate and non-ultimate numbers. Yes of course: number 0 !
  14. This has analogies with the organization of matter especially within quarks which are with electric charges of thirds of electrons
  15. A very strong entanglement links all these sets of numbers which oppose in multiple ways in ratios of value 3/2 (or reversibly of ratios 2/3). For example, the first 6 ultimates (0-1-2-3-5-7) are simultaneously opposed to the 4 non-ultimates (4-6-8-9) among the first 10 natural numbers, to the 4 raiseds of the first 10 non-ultimates (4-8-9-16) and to the 4 ultimates beyond the first 10 whole numbers (11-13-17-19). Yes as M. Jackson said: this is it! It's a bit complicated, it's an enumeration of several criteria contrary to my definition in one way.
  16. Sensei and taeto, thank you for this debate. I'm not interested in semiprimes. For example number 30, which I qualify in non-ultimate, but also in pure composite, is with 3 divisors (2, 3 and 5). Number 48, 10th mixed composite, with 5 divisors whose 4 identical (2,2,2,2 and 3) and called as mixed because for example this is (2×2×2) ×(2×3). Also, take a good look at my article in detail, I am only interested at the beginning of the lists of numbers and with numbers of entities of multiples of 5 of which mainly 10, 25 and 100. Where a ratio 3/2 can appear (and it appears really a lot in my dozens of matrices presented). In OEIS site, the ultimate numbers sequence (A158611) is called “0, 1 and the primes”. This is not a precise name! And if you look on the site, there is no clear definition applying simultaneously to primes, to 0 and to 1. My ultimates concept is without any ambiguity (and includes 0 and 1): An ultimate number not admits any non-trivial divisor (whole number) being less than it. Let n be a whole number (belonging to ℕ*), this one is ultimate if no divisor (whole number) lower than its value and other than 1 divides it.
  17. Taeto, you should read the article to understand: 48 and 81 are not examples, they are part of the first 10 numbers of each class. For the classes of numbers, I distinguish the raised numbers from the other composites. By this process, the different types of numbers oppose in ratio 3/2 for the 10 first. The 10 primordial are the 10 first numbers of the 4 classes which I propose. This is not speculation but a mathematical definition! otherwise prove the opposite: 0, 1 and all primes (ultimate numbers) not admit any non-trivial divisor (whole number) being less than them. Other numbers (non-ultimate numbers) admit at least one non-trivial divisor (whole number) being less than them. Please replace this post in mathematics. Below are listed, to illustration of definition, some of the first ultimate or non-ultimate numbers defined above, especially particular numbers zero (0) and one (1). - 0 is ultimate: although it admits an infinite number of divisors superior to it, since it is the first whole number, the number 0 does not admit any divisor being inferior to it. - 1 is ultimate: since the division by 0 has no defined result, the number 1 does not admit any divisor (whole number) being less than it. - 2 is ultimate: since the division by 0 has no defined result, the number 2 does not admit any divisor* being less than it. - 4 is non-ultimate: the number 4 admits the number 2 (number being less than it) as divisor *. - 6 is non-ultimate: the number 6 admits numbers 2 and 3 (numbers being less than it) as divisors *. - 7 is ultimate: since the division by 0 has no defined result, the number 7 does not admit any divisor* being less than it. The non-trivial divisors 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 cannot divide it into whole numbers. - 12 is non-ultimate: the number 6 admits numbers 2, 3, 4 and 6 (numbers being less than it) as divisors*. Thus, by these previous definitions, the set of whole numbers is organized into these two entities: - the set of ultimate numbers, which is the fusion of the prime numbers sequence with the numbers 0 and 1. - the set of non-ultimate numbers identifying to the non-prime numbers sequence, deduced from the numbers 0 and 1. * non-trivial divisor.
  18. Certainly, each particle of the Universe contains all the laws governing it as the image of the alive cell containing in its core all genetic information to be it living respective.

    This is what I seek to discover during my different works.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. koti


      A status update is not the place to discuss this, you should set up a thread or discuss in a relevant existing thread. The answer to you question on "how does a particle know" is: The laws of physics. A cell on the other hand contains genetic information because biology and evolution. If you're trying to unify biology and physics you might want to reconsider otherwise we might conclude you have loose screws or missing some even. 

    3. Jean-Yves BOULAY

      Jean-Yves BOULAY

      Matter called living is made up of physical particles, so there is a relationship.

    4. koti


      One could find some kind of a miniscule relationship between everything in the Universe.

  19. Hello, I think this may interest you. I propose a new mathematical definition making no distinction between the set of prime numbers and the numbers 0 and 1. Here is an overview of my attached article (or linked below): “According to a new mathematical definition, whole numbers are divided into two sets, one of which is the merger of the sequence of prime numbers and numbers zero and one. Three other definitions, deduced from this first, subdivide the set of whole numbers into four classes of numbers with own and unique arithmetic properties. The geometric distribution of these different types of whole numbers, in various closed matrices, is organized into exact value ratios to 3/2 or 1/1. Definition of an ultimate number: Considering the set of whole numbers, these are organized into two sets: ultimate numbers and non-ultimate numbers. Ultimate numbers definition: An ultimate number not admits any non-trivial divisor (whole number) being less than it. Non-ultimate numbers definition: A non-ultimate number admits at least one non-trivial divisor (whole number) being less than it. Other definitions: Let n be a whole number (belonging to ℕ), this one is ultimate if no divisor (whole number) lower than its value and other than 1 divides it. Let n be a natural whole number (belonging to ℕ), this one is non-ultimate if at least one divisor (whole number) lower than its value and other than 1 divides it.” Please give your full attention to this. For example, the extension of Sophie Germain's concept of number applied to these new classes of numbers generates other singular phenomena. Original full text The_ultimate_numbers_JY_Boulay_2020.pdf
  20. There are the statistics announced throughout the article and in the appendix.
  21. Hello everybody! This is the approach: just the study of the first appearance of the ten digits. And these are real facts and only singular findings without, at this time, explanations of why these curious phenomena are. Many studies focus on Pi. Pi is a ratio (perimeter / diameter) and the number 1 / Pi (diameter / perimeter) is equally interesting to study.
  22. Abstract of the paper "Pi an Golden Number: not random occurrences of the ten digits". Number Pi and the Golden Section as well as the inverse of these numbers are made up of a series of apparently random decimal places. This paper is on the occurrence order of the 10 digits of decimal system in these fundamental mathematic numbers. It is in fact that the ten digits of decimal system does not appear randomly in the sequence of Pi and in Golden Section. Also, same phenomena operate in many other constants of which the square roots of numbers 2, 3 and 5, the first three prime numbers. 1. Introduction. The number Pi (p) and the Golden Number (φ) and the inverse of these numbers are made up of a seemingly random digits. This article is about order of the first appearance of the ten figures of decimal system in these fundamental numbers of mathematics. There turns out that the ten digits decimal system (combined here with their respective numbers: figure 1 = number 1, figure 2 = number 2, etc..) do not appear randomly in the digits sequence of Pi (p) and the digits sequence of Golden Number (φ). The same phenomenon is also observed for the inverse of these two numbers (1/p et 1/φ). 1.1. Method. This article studies the order of the first appearance of the ten figures of the decimal system in the decimals of constants (or numbers). After location of these ten digits merged then in numbers (figure 1 = number 1, etc), an arithmetical study of these is introduced... (excerpt from the paper)...In constants π, 1/π and φ (a), the occurrence order of ten digits of the decimal system © compared to the rank of appearance (b) is organized into identical arithmetical arrangements (d) (excerpt from the paper)...Into the occurrence order of digits of their decimals, the constants 1/π and 1/φ have the same ratio to 3/2 (probability to 1/11. 66). In this division, there are the same first six and last four digits (probability to 1/210). Both split their figures to form the same four areas multiples of 9 (probability to 1/420). It appears finally that, for these two fundamental constants, the same digits appear in the same four areas of 1, 2, 3 and 4 figures (probability to 1/12600)… (excerpt from the paper)...A formula, derived from the continued fraction of Rogers-Ramanujan including the 4 fundamental numbers π, φ, e and i, isorganized into same four zones of 1, 2, 3 and 4 digits and with the same first 6 and last 4 digits as the constant 1/π, and the constant 1/φ. Complet paper here (and in attached file): http://jean-yves.boulay.pagesperso-orange.fr/pi/index.htm Pi and Golden Number not random occurrences of the ten digits.pdf Others some examples of phenomena introducted in the paper.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.