pittsburghjoe

And yet you don't want to inspect hidden variables?

My ears are burning. Hey, you two won't be so funny when you read these articles coming out capturing particles during superposition.

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6313/734.full <deleted by mod> ! Moderator Note We cannot allow you to post methods of obtaining articles through avoiding pay-walls. imatfaal

let's see your math explaining spooky action at a distance

I'm pretty sure "superposition" translates to "we don't know" in Greek. You love stating the incomplete math side. Yes it can give us good enough results ..BUT that's not good enough for me! There is magic going on an I want in on it! "there are hidden variables" will be engraved on my tombstone.

I know QM can apply up to a full molecule in the double slit. But bigger than that, you are saying composite systems can have free particles within them? Is pre-GR newton? I don't get your point here. A large solid object will have lots of connected atoms and yes the individual atoms will have a electrons floating around doing the bonds ..but that's negligible. If you solve superposition, you solve wave phenomena.

ok, ok, I thought unifying the theories only involved the the studies of very large and the very small

Because you would be out of a job if not? edit: gah, you wrote more stuff, so now I look like a big jerk

QM isn't needed unless an object can go in to superposition. GUT = kicking QM to the curb and asking it for help on a per needed basis.

All the craziness from QM is significantly narrowed down to basically just free individual particles (anything with a long enough quantum wavelength ). General Relativity takes over for everything else.

Why isn't knowledge of the Quantum-Classical Boundary good enough for unification?

and why that is.

I don't care how wild they are, I want to hear them. This is the speculations section of the forum. I say it's an obvious side effect to a change made to the foundation of our universe in order for something special to be able to occur.

It is now!

something planned ahead of time

I think I stumbled onto the answer for Quantum weirdness and It's going to make you furious. Like it or not, the double slit experiment seems to demonstrate that our physical world grows from each of our consciousnesses. One study has shown that the on/off switch for consciousnesses may reside in or around the Claustrum in the brain. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22329762-700-consciousness-on-off-switch-discovered-deep-in-brain/ It is this area of the brain that I purpose we first search for particles in superposition/entangled states. If we were to find such a thing, it could prove that our consciousnesses is being sent to our brains via entanglement. All quantum weirdness would then have a reason for being the way it is ..it's necessary in order for lifeforms to have a conscious.

Can it also be said that the measured photon is disassociated with wave phenomena? Or could the wave be morphing, on demand, in a way that doesn't cause double slit photon interference?

http://algorithmicassertions.com/quantum/2014/04/27/The-Not-Quantum-Laplace-Transform.html I'm looking into Q talbot carpet, that might be close to what I'm after.

Doesn't that mean we could accurately reconstruct wave phenomena in an animation? Why can't I ever find something like this?

I understood some of the words http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11027

Well, just look at how close to 0 we had to get to freeze helium. Tiny differences in gravity that we can currently test for simply are not drastic enough. Has a double slit ever been set up to to slide towards a hovering particle? It would have to be loose enough that you couldn't be sure what slit it would go through.

We can't know, for sure, if gravity takes part until we test it without gravity present.

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/jun/22/experiment-is-first-to-see-kicking-photons-heat-up-nanoparticles Yes, no value in someone with a fresh set of eyes on the problem

Isn't this a rather big revelation to QM? Or is this something you already knew about for years?

I originally assumed gravity had something to do with the cutoff ..but now this seams like a good answer?