Randolpin

As we base in q.m., reality is uncertain before we measure it.There is no certainty of reality unless measurement is applied.It is like math.The answer #1 could be the result of either: 1*1 1+1 1/1 depending on what operation you prefer This is the act of measuring the reality of 1.

space-time or more accurately, space-matter- time is only an illusion.We define reality as we measure it.Like in magic, we observe and measure what is being presented not the mechanisms behind that magic.

Time as an illusion is justified in quantum mechanics.Since quantum mechanics has the characteristic of being uncertain due to uncertainty principle we can conclude that time in Q.M. is not present cause it is uncertain neither past, present nor future.

The evidence is already there.Consider the observations of astronomers that our universe is expanding because of the central force in the center of the universe which is the D.E.

You misunderstood me, dark energy is only part of the energy field of space, it is not dark energy which is not uniform but the energy field of the whole space itself.

Mr./Mrs./Ms. Sensei, as what I have said, the energy field I mean of matter is it's mass, while the energy field of space is the space itself.For me, dark energy only suggest that the energy field of space is not uniform.The cause of this un-uniformity could be trace back during the beginning of the universe.

I like the idea that time seems to flow because clocks illustrates it through successive tick tacks.But if we eliminate clocks, did time really flows? I think the best definition of the observation of changing world is not by concluding that time flows but instead by looking the universe change because "MATTER CHANGES" not "TIME FLOWS".The use of the phrase "TIME FLOWS" is still okay because it is convenient.

I mean, it is not a real thing being independent as a "thing". It is just like a tape measure, measuring the amount of change a matter undergone.That's why, imposing the idea that time is a thing is only an illusion.

This is only my new look on space, so I speculated about it.

Space itself has energy.Probably dark energy is the energy of space which is almost 0.This observation would suggest that the characteristic of the energy field of space is very different than that of matter. A little amount of energy field of space, for example 0.000000001 would have a strong impact unlike the energy field of matter in 0.000000001 which has a weak impact. What I mean of a negative energy field of space is just a result of the analogy to southpole.Actually,I agree there is no negative energy but what I really mean is Zero.

What I mean is space itself has negative or zero energy field and in matter,positive energy field in the form of mass. Space itself is the arena for matter.There is no energy or capacity to do work if there is no space, so space like in electrical wirings, is the neutral or the ground for the energy in every matter behave in the way it is.

Sorry, This are only speculative calculations.. As far as science is concerned.No one knows. It could be that both matter and space arose at the same moment in the past from absolute nothingness.

First I will provide the math. I am not sure if this is enough to support my conjecture. let's assume space= 0 and matter=1. It's just a simple math.No tedious calculations. Here it is: 0+0=0 or 0-0=0 or 0*0=0 or 0/0=math error (assume= 0). As what you observed no matter what operation is conducted, it is always 0. It is like space. When it is all space so the energy field is 0 or negative.Meaning no distortion of space bec. there is no matter within it. But if there is matter.It makes now sense. 0+1=1,0-1=-1,0*1=0,0/1=0 We see here that if there is matter it distorts space (0+1=1) or a blackhole form if the energy of matter is so intense and the size is so small (0-1=-1) and so on. I hope that you understand it.

This speculation is all about space being a negative energy field while matter is a positive energy field which allows matter to change since the space around it is negative.In other words, space is the southpole while matter is the northpole. For me ,this would reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity since quantum mechanics lies in the positive energy field of matter while general relativity lies in space which has negative energy field.Gravity is the pseudoforce as a result of the interaction of matter and space. After all it is only my speculation, but who knows?

Matter changes .Everything changes in this world except change itself.So the amount of change a matter undergone is what represent as time so time is only an illusion.It is not a real thing.It is merely a representation of how much change a matter undergone.I know I could be asserting here but it is what the definition of time for me. Since time= Amount of change a matter had undergone so, Space-time in detailed form is space-(matter change). We can see here that the 4th dimension is the changing property of matter (time).

Time is an illusion.

Sorry, your answer is what I want to convey to you.Thank you.So,according to you,we don't know if mathematics is effective in describing our reality in the long run.If it has a limit or not. Based on my study in quantum mechanics and other observations,yes.

I wonder how time become a mystery to those who probe it's nature.But regarding my question,is it really a real thing or just a representation or a meter of how much change a matter had undergone because we all know in the physicality of our observable reality,it change except change itself which the second law of thermodynamics applies. Any more explanation of it to lighten more our understanding is very much appreciated.Thank you....

These are the questions that could not be easily answered.But for the sake of awareness for everybody here, I want to share these questions to you specially to those who already accept the multiverse theory. The questions points on the multiverse source of energy to create multiple universes.My questions are: 1. Is the source of energy infinite?Why the source of energy is infinite? 2. Where did this source of energy came from?Did it have a beginning? 3.Is space outside this observable universe (if there is really an outside) infinite? These are my inquiries.Response are greatly appreciated.Thank you....

Nice answer.Thank you for your sincerity to answer.I appreciate it. So, still it is an open question whether our reality can be described mathematically. I just want to share this to you.How about the paradoxes,the strange things discovered by science which contradicts the previously known mathematical models like the problem of the origin of galaxies which is still not yet solve.Or in paradox,the fermi-hart paradox.??

Then,base on this observation,is it has a cause or not?

Yes, I know that.Sorry, I didn't specified what my point is.I mean the physical reality.Is logic can always be applied to the laws of nature which runs our physical reality,which for example.as what physics pursue?

I just want to ask this question for you to become aware.We all know that logic is one of the major fuel which runs our rationality which is portrayed through science.But I dare you by asking this question ( if you don't know or cultivate an answer,just leave it).Is our reality can always be represented thru logic ? or are there parts of reality which logic can't be applied? Tnx in advance for those who sincerely and conducively replied.And I'm pleased to meet you all.

For my curiousity sake, I want to ask this question to you guys who are scientifically inclined individuals. Is Q.F has a cause or not?