darth tater

I didn't mean to suggest that you did say anything to the contrary. It is just that when I asked if your OP was to refute creationists who took a literal reading of Genisis as fact, or if you intended to refute all creationists in general, I was set upon by some of the readers here as having asked a question that was off topic and I was told that a creationist was a person who believed in Genisis and only a person who believed in the literal reading of Genisis. I have been trying ever since to clarify that point with limited success.

But it would seem that you agree that there are some who believe in creation and evolution?

OK. I just thought that since the OP referred to "creationists" in the first sentence that he might have intended it as an argument against all creationists and not just the creationist who believes in a literal reading of Genisis.

Oh, was that a pun? I thought a pun was supposed to be a real word.

Is this supposed to be an argument against creationism, or an argument against a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis?