bsimecek

Excellent reply Martin! Has any of the major physics guru's ever publicly accepted CNS or even hinted at it's acceptance?

I am not an expert in physics, but I am an astute spectator of the reoccurring systems around me. After watching quite a few documentaries surrounding Stephen Hawking, I have been honing in on an idea that I have had for quite some time. I suggest that our universe is made up of infinitesimal parts. Black holes break down our known universe (dimension, gravity, time...) into these smallest of parts and translate them into the Big Bang beginning of another universe. I would translate this to one universe giving birth to another. This would be like a mothers' body breaking down everything she ingests in order for the fetus's body to be able to create something new with it. The new universe will contain many of the characteristics of the mother, but will be unique (basic properties of gravity, time, etc...) and on its own. In a conference a few years ago, Hawking had tried to settle the "information paradox" by essentially saying saying that there are universes without black holes and therefore information is preserved. I believe this is like saying there are (universes) children without the ability to conceive (dead end universes). My question is if there has been any other views of black hole theory that preserve this type of system or not? Any thoughts?