North...
thoughts on your question...
"time" is the measure of the conscious mind of infinity???
what come's first when viewing anything by the mind???
perception???
without perception, there is no "time" able to be spoken of, thus making perception as the "root" of time, and all other things such as movement, energy, etc. etc. deemed as secondary, to allow focused attention on the "root" or inception of the essence of "time"???
as with all things, the reason one first seek an answer, tell the answer that will be found???
a paradox of the human brain???
if i wish to calculate my speed of a movement, then this be my motive, so a time definition will be used to facilitate this need, or want, or motive of inquiry of an answer???
it could easily be said that time is only the "marking" of the memory of the human brain, of all things within environment, as appearing to end and begin, to establish a "human existence", or simply "witnessing" all things thru measurement of time, to allow the brain to grasp better infinite time???
as of course, hot does not exist without cold, so the two must be kept as one unit, not seperated by the mind as two entities, just as time must be, to unravel greater understanding of it by the conscious mind???
it is indeed most difficult to peer into time, since all things within environment are based and measured on time, and the brain and body of self reside within "self as time" also, as trappped in a "time measurment system" of lineal, but indeed, if time is not first considered as infinite, then the inception point of study is biased, first accessing limited realms of possibility, having no greater basis for these limitations, than of no limitations at all???
so for time to not be first considered to be "equally" possible as infinite, be but a pre-disposition, a bias of logic at inception of study, this garnering all thought direction, therefore conclusions???
it seems this would indeed preclude unbiased sight, of the logic, into the understanding of the possible possibilties of limitless time or infinity???
indeed, time having thus far been factored as lineal in it's inception, would have garnered or as limited the essence of science theory, in the aspects of time, and seems to first calculate all things as circular, or as never ending, would be the only way to unravel the mysteries of the cosmos of infinite time, if indeed such did exist???
but why infinite time not exist???
if all things in the cosmos, have a polor opposite, to exist, then time as well, could easily be seen as having to follow the same principle's of the entire cosmos???
but what exist to human man, except what man first believe exist, so therefore then strike forth with effort to prove it's existence???
just thoughts...
