EmmaWhat

 

Reducing society down to an "either/or" perspective ignores the nuances necessary to make a society of individuals liveable.

What do you mean?

 

 

Killing an animal because you need to to eat is very different from sport. You seriously can't see that, or are you too first-world?

Yes I can't see that. How is there a difference?

 

 

Your other examples all seem negative

What do you mean by negative?

 

 

, yet you don't understand killing to eat is a natural system? I guess in your worldview even eating a salad would be murder, right? Nothing goes.

No eating a salad is not murder, how do come by this.

What is the difference between killing an animal for fun and killing one for food?

What is the difference between hurting or offending someone for fun or doing it for spite or doing it out of hate.

The only way a society can be truly happy is if nothing goes or if anything goes. The problem with drawing lines is that people will always want to move them and other people will always want to cross them.

For the record, I don't find jokes about anything offensive. I just find them distasteful and a cheap unintelligent way of making money. Anyone that needs to make these jokes is either fucked up mentally or is so greedy they'll do anything for money.

I also find the killing of animals for fun just as distasteful and the same people are just as fucked up or greedy. I was just trying to make a point. My point is that if you find anything about the death of a baby funny, then the killing of a giraffe for fun is just as funny.

How all species developed out of a Big Bang . You disclaim primordial soup so what then ? .

I am not a biologist and looking to find some sort of description of an answer to the question above, if we have one at all.