Duration

Minimum does not equal zero, as "nothing" does.

Nope, I can explain it.

Anyone have an answer yet?

I use the bare minimum that I know to be true.

Yes, that would be the one, and I'm not concerned with how that works, it's BS, it isn't the physical reality. Food is mass, distance, and time. Does your science know how mass, distance and time operates in this universe? I do. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged How's that working for you? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged Does the Earth get closer or further away from the Sun? A simple question your science should have asked and answered at the beginning of its quest. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedWhy won't anyone answer that question? Afraid of what people might think? Would they call you crazy? :rolleyes: Just say it gets closer or gets further away. What does your science say it does?

You're so wrapped up in the methodology of it all you can't see straight. Get a grip on yourself, we are talking about the physical universe, not your method of measuring it, using junk to measure with. No wonder science is so ate up.

Belief doesn't factor in? Are you out of your mind? You perform scientific tests and you say there is no belief or disbelief in the results? No belief in what you are doing is correct or incorrect? No belief system=vegetable. Pull the plug, you don't need life without belief.

I want none of the credit. Do as you will with my idea. Take it and run. Make it a reality. That's all I want.

Too lazy to be honest. I was never good in school. I have no clue of the scientific method. I just want someone to take it and run, for all to see.

Evidence is the easy part when you know what to look for.

I have no resources, and I have no network. My idea stops at me unless someone takes it and runs with it.

Sure, that's why I said they need to believe in it. They need to visualize what I am saying, and put it in numbers, so everyone can see how it works, mathematically.

I don't care what they think of me, show me the math!

I want the math first. Heck, the math, if done properly would tell you almost exactly how old the Earth is today.

I need help from someone that believes in my theory, and is excellent with mathematics, and can show mathematically why this is the truth.

I agree 100%, Klaynos. I've been waiting for that moment.

I would too.

I'm still thinking of a way. How would you test it?

According to my theory, all objects get further from their core, because they came from their core. That means the planets came from the sun. That means Mars used to be in our current orbit, and look similar to our planet, with an atmosphere and liquid water, as the temperatures were roughly what we have today. Our planet was once where Venus is today. It has since moved further from the sun. Our planet will continue to get further from the sun, and be in the orbit Mars is currently in today. Earth will have cooled and lost most of its atmosphere as we know it today. Earth will roughly look like Mars and be where Mars is today in some years down the road. If we need to find a new planet to live, we need to look closer to the sun, as those planets will be where we are today in the future, and they will have roughly the temps and atmosphere we have today. All objects move away from their core, or "nucleus."

Do a search for: Motor Daddy Traveler Duration Read all those thousands of posts, in all those threads, and then, when you still don't understand it, come see me. I'll answer any question I can.

Thank You.

Just one question: What time device do they use to measure .000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011111111 seconds?

No, past experiments have a common problem, they don't have the proper equipment to measure a difference of .0000000000000000000000000001 seconds. I already posted the facts that say different mass objects fall at different rates. A net force is the difference between one force and another force. The greater the net the greater the acceleration, as shown above, the more massive objects takes longer to impact.

I'm showing that gravity is caused by a net force, and is inversely proportional to the distance. Acceleration rates are different for different mass objects in free fall. All objects do not fall at the same rate.

Try calculating the net force divided by the distance. Gravity is caused by a net force. The greater the net the greater the acceleration, inversely proportional to the distance. Let's just ASSUME the Earth has the mass of 5,974,200,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg. We are going to compare impact times of two different objects when dropped from an exact height of 16.087 feet. Object A has a mass of 1 kg Object B has a mass of 10 kg Using the formula A=(L-S)/R2 Object A has a "A value" of 371,368,185,491,390,563,809,286.93976503 Object B has a "A value" of 371,368,185,491,390,563,809,286.38030708 A previous test was done with object A. It was determined that object A took exactly 1 second to impact the ground when dropped from a height of 16.087 feet, which is an acceleration of 32.174 ft/sec^2. That means an “A value” of 1, has an acceleration of 32.174/371,368,185,491,390,563,809,286.93976503= .0000000000000000000000866363928224699541361186580 02141 ft/sec^2 If you multiply that by Object B’s “A value”, you find an acceleration of 32.173999999999999999999951530582 ft/sec^2 for object B. Now, let’s look at the time it takes for each object to hit the ground, when dropped from the 16.087 feet. Object A- 1.0000000000000000000000000000000 seconds Object B- 1.0000000000000000000000007532389 seconds