Jump to content

sonjouten05

Senior Members
  • Posts

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sonjouten05

  1. its like one, it has alot of the characteristics. but i its kept in place by its seal and rotation. you can use air in the explosion to create the initial environment for the bottle. the air will spread in it internally. it just needs a perfect seal, everytime you enter or leave a little time dissipates from it.
  2. a nuke with the pressure faced inward, compressing as much space as it gathers in one spot. some kind of electro-gravic(mass induced, some how) container. probably rotating as fast as humanly possible, idk exactly.. lol.. but i know it can be done. black holes do it all the time. Ophiolite you dont need to. the creation of the world needs to be "clean space", though its inners will be nuclear for some time (thousand years or so.. but remember time dilation...) so depending on condition you can send crews to clean it and set a "ground", and go from there. the container its going to be in needs to be just far enough away to almost fall into the space, but instead "catch it"
  3. This is an "invention" that ive had in my head for a while.. it is an efficient means of storage, city building, farming, and even "accelerated evolution" (due to the effects of time dilation, fitting 40 sq miles or so into the space of a matchbox will obviously have an altered effect on time, making it pass faster in the bottle than on the outside) How will it be built? an implosion bomb, detonated in outerspace outside any planets immediate rotation path ( we dont want too many unintended consequences) as the implosion happens a rotating electromagnetic container(rotating) is placed of the imploded area to contain the "spacetime" that was squeezed out of empty space. Fill it up with air, put a little earth in it.. and than bam. you have a city, or a portable farm, or a civilization holding spaceship so small that no telescope will see it. The gravitational effect inside the jar will be inverted compared to a normal planet. for one thing because its rotating, everything inside of it will try to push out (but be prevented because of the walls of the bottle. Time will definitely flow differently, with one day on the outside being many more on the inside. An advanced alien species would surely have invented this, and surely use it as a more advanced urbanization method (along with the thousands of other uses it could be used for) And that is why the fermi paradox is perceived, any evolved advanced species will be utilizing it. And of course the drake equation, as it is being utilized now, is inaccurate because the value of the variable for the time from sentience to extinction is lower than it should be. The idea for the device came to me in a dream, while i was reading Einsteins General and special relativity (fifth edition). No i dont believe it was a prophesy dream, but i do believe the subconscious will answer things for you and even give you a starting point to a good idea. I know this is a speculative device, but i think it completely agrees with relativity and if it actually came to be human kind will possibly evolve exponentially more so than we ever could in our current space/time dimension. if i am wrong though, please tell me.
  4. Ok, I posted a wild speculation yesterday that human's aren't actually the most advanced species on the planet. Were a branch of primate that deviated from a shared common ancestor with apes and chimps some 5 million years ago or so. (We didn't evolve from apes, but we share a grand father a few hundred thousand generations ago or so.) Considering that even some of the most extreme extinction events humans can conceive we still have a 70% chance of some of us surviving. Reptiles are substantially more adaptive than we are, and theyve existed here at least 150 million years before us. Im not saying definitively that a super smart sentient reptiloid has co evolved with us for over 5 million years, but i do know you cant excuse it. I know if humans grasped relativity and spacetime as efficient as wed like, we would've detected gravitational waves 80 years ago already manipulating them (allowing to build time/space in a bottle, similar to space time dilation effects in a black hole but for the purpose of having a personalized dimension. According to relativity with better technology we could do it) I think other advanced species manipulation of space time bubbles is precisely why the fermi paradox is perceived. Also drakes equation as done today is inaccurate because the value for lifespan of an advanced species is too low. But as i stated before, most likely the unexplained ufo's that are seen on earth are MOST LIKELY beings that are from here, theyre likely related to reptiles (like we are to apes.) I know all my "proof" is anecdotal and circumstantial at best (including high incidents of Russian uso, aka unidentified submerged objects) but based on our own evolution progression and the fact that there's surely beings that wouldve reached sentient sapienism before us (sorry christians, humans aren't special.) I actually do believe in alien life (i think its almost as natural as the formation of the atom, just takes time and right conditions.) Most life is unrecognized by humans because its either too primative or too advanced, but i think its on every structure in our solar system including the sun. But the ufo's and uso's that are in our night sky are likely as terrestrial as we are, but they're not human.
  5. To me, how were "as great as a storm".. whose to say that storm isn't a sentient being? They grow, consume reproduce, use water and air, and don't always move as projected. Its obviously not the most intelligent life, but it affects the most people.. me believing storms are alive already says there's alien life (storms on other planets) but chances are if any of all the unexplained ufo cases are to be believed (including by ex presidents and military personnel) what ever the beings were MORE than likely came from here. They're terrestrial non humanoids. "Time in a bottle " was a weird dream i had long ago. Basically i looked over a weird rotating barrel and it sucked me in. Inside of it was vast, probably city sized at least. As i walked through (don't remember why) i finally found a "hole" which was a gas slot window. Look through and i see the lamp in the room with the barrel rotating slowly, like the sun in the sky. I think thats how they diverged the fossil record, they made a world in a bottle so to speak, but the flow of time is vast. Theyve probably came close to the limits of cell division if they're too evolved.. being unable or slow to reproduce..
  6. Just speculating. No way of knowing for sure, but thats what i believe based on the evidence. Anecdotal or otherwise, i think we don't have them in our immediate fossil records because the life theyre not is much smaller and more space efficient than they was than, the hyperbolic time chamber from Dragon ball z would be a good analogy of they world they created to survive, cut off spatially and dimensionally, they still come through our dimension but the flow of time is much different between the two planes. I believe it though, i truly do.
  7. russian "uso's" unidentified submerged objects, come from the ocean than fly, theres thousands of documented cases from respected military personnel there and of course here in america. I think its like how ants in an ant farm might see us, obviously theyre not exactly aggressive, otherwise they wouldve killed us (instead of slowly farming us, which seems much more likely) Theyre quite indifferent to us, but i think at the same time would rather us going on believing that we really are the "top of the food chain" My evidence for the entire belief is quite simple, evolution. Reptiles were promonate for much longer than primates, i definately believe they advanced to similar levels to our current levels in the past, lived through a few extinction events, and now mostly just exist in a spatial dimensional bottle(which also affects the timeflow inside, making a 100 years or so in 5 weeks maybe? if they can compress that much space at least..) I think they did interact before, and probably was likely for many religious movements, as to their desires. no telling, itd be like a termite figuring out what a walrus wants.
  8. i dont think it has a peak, thats exactly my point. i think another sentient being exists, i think they hide themselves very well and have no direct motivation to interact with us, though obviously it accidentally happens. they arent aliens though, theyre as terrestrial as you and i.
  9. if you really think that humanity is at the peak of evolution, than yes. Its definitely obvious for one person. even under the worst extinction scenarios we think are possible, it seems entirely possible that theres still a 70% chance of humans surviving in some form. you really think that a sapient being that is several million years or so more evolved than us could have increased there survival chances as well? Seriously, I dont see how people dont see the obviousness of it. if you believe evolution than other branches of intelligent life being of different species, is not only possible.. but likely..
  10. You know, humans are very stupid in general and quite arrogant.. We've spent what? around 2000 years or so up in the sky for life that may or may not be wanting to wipe us out.. Yet.. you look at the sheer mass of the earth, and we don't actively inhabit 25% of that.. and the fact that we are really only about 100k-500k years old evolutionarily speaking, yet we know that many things had evolutionary head starts on us, things that adapted to those environments and very LIKELY that some of their descendants still exist with us today, either deep in the ocean depths, or even possibly "bottled time" containers that squeeze the spacetime of a city or so into the size of a barrel. It turns out that most unexplained ufo sightings may not be alien at all... well that theyre earthling anyways. Theres a good chance theyre closer related to reptiles though, just well.. reasons.
  11. I know evolution is *true. i say that because its a question that cant be 100% proven yet but its known.. in scientific non dogmatic religious circles anyways(not all religious circles though.. too much to go in right there.. some people actually worship science though.. just so you know..) which is i guess why one cant dismiss any religious point, because it relates to someone's interpretation of what happened scientifically. the part i need help with is telling me if theres any evidence against my theory (proof of gendered life before the moon), if not than well figure out where to go from there. honestly im really intrigued by this... i think itd be a great subject to add to future textbooks.. (im drunk, and im sorry.. but at one time people said i was very smart, so i just want to know.. if what i though was right, is right. and if string theory is *true it should go with everything, right?)
  12. ive always had a problem with 3d and for that 4d quantization of our current (11d?) spectrum of reality. evolution is very.. obscure to say the least and to be able to say what came from what is almost too much for a mortal man.. but.. i know what i seen and i know what our collective intelligence tells us.. the moon is why theres males and females. what made life exist before that point was always there but after that... our pollinisation or our "genderization" is what caused some of us to be male and others to be female. so you believe me though dont you (i know you wont say it, because.. well... reasons... but you see the connection.. i too feel this needs to be proven or disproven) who knows.. maybe because of this me.. "jason james clowers" will be seen as one of the innovative imaginaries of our days.
  13. anyone that has ever tripped on mushrooms or even "acid" at certain amounts knows what im talking about.. evolutionary progression.. why did genders form? and why are they so different from most defined genderless life forms? well.. it was the moon. the moon affected our evolutionary progress when it was formed in our rotation. life's reaction to the moon affected our progress to this point, the moon acted as a sperm to our earths "eggs" which developed into gendered life. Panspermia is real.. but what actually started life here on earth happened long before then.. but.. the moon is why nowadays theres males and females. I want this to be discussed, im saying this from a stoner mentality but i kinda just want to see if im wrong.. so help?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.