ensea2004

No problem.

I started the topic before your warning. I don't know that's not permitted to have more accounts.

I forgot that I already have an account.

I'm sorry.

Is this theory described in this link Which is being removed due to a rules violation respects special relativity conditions.

My question is a pure mathematics.

I want to view what a simple case of interaction gives.

Thank you, now I understood the origin of Heisenberg inequality.

I see also that Heisenberg inequality is :

My question is : Exists a same kind of this inequality for this "new nokton theory" ?

Hi studiot, I see you are connected to forum, can you respond at my last post ?

Vous avez besoin d'un resume.

 

C'est vraiment normal, n'est pas?

You speak french ?

I'm graduated. I know exactly what a function. For operator I have an idea.

I agree with you.

But the common with Wolfram and Fredkin is using non probabilitic rules like cellular automata.

They are some common ideas, like using a grid and rules. States are updated by step.

But there's a difference : Edward Fredkin uses a deterministic rules and nokton theory uses some kind of probabilities.

Il found an article about Dr. Edward Fredkin and digital philosophy.

http://www.digitalphilosophy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/nsmin.pdf

Anyone read the paper ?

What suprises me is that having been told there is a body of mathematics that develops a much more general situation than the over-restricted mathematics presented in the paper, you are not interested.

Can you explain more.

I have not checked that the Schwarz inequality will lead to the paper's results but they look similar.

Where ?

Some notions are completely different from quantum mechanics and standart model like symmetries, observable...

I think the author search for help.

No idea.

But the theory defines some kind of observables. It use a prabability. So we can calculate mean, standart deviation...

It's about rules. Il think the rules must be rational.

we are always sqrt(x)²=x.

 

Does he present any evidence for this?

It's a hypothesis. I think Loop Quantum Gravity use a discrete space and time.

 

Can you explain how.

Because the theory use a well definited states for all noktons. The probability of displacements forces us to take all possible paths.

 

I don't follow.

k _-x ( i,t, Γ ) = .... /D(i,j,t, Γ ) ⁴

First, can space and time both discret, unlike general relativity.

Second, I found that the idea resolve the measurement problem in quantum mechanis.

I don't think.

Recently I found a paper about new theory. It seems a kind of digital physics.

The paper is located at this link http://figshare.com/articles/Nokton_theory/1549720

Is it a good candidate to be a theory of everything ?