Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ensea2004

  1. No problem. I started the topic before your warning. I don't know that's not permitted to have more accounts.
  2. I forgot that I already have an account. I'm sorry. You close posts in a hurry and banish accounts without explanation. Probably, it is necessary to make more patience.
  3. Is this theory described in this link Which is being removed due to a rules violation respects special relativity conditions.
  4. My question is a pure mathematics. I want to view what a simple case of interaction gives.
  5. I need help to calculate exact or approximated probabilities. I am interesting by the content of a new theory (view this link http://figshare.com/articles/Nokton_theory/1549720 for details). Currently, I studing the interactions of two neutral noktons in one dimension. I suspect that the probabilty of any position is periodic, but I can't prove it.
  6. Thank you, now I understood the origin of Heisenberg inequality. I see also that Heisenberg inequality is : My question is : Exists a same kind of this inequality for this "new nokton theory" ?
  7. Hi studiot, I see you are connected to forum, can you respond at my last post ?
  8. I'm graduated. I know exactly what a function. For operator I have an idea.
  9. I agree with you. But the common with Wolfram and Fredkin is using non probabilitic rules like cellular automata.
  10. They are some common ideas, like using a grid and rules. States are updated by step. But there's a difference : Edward Fredkin uses a deterministic rules and nokton theory uses some kind of probabilities.
  11. Il found an article about Dr. Edward Fredkin and digital philosophy. http://www.digitalphilosophy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/nsmin.pdf
  12. Can you explain more. Where ?
  13. Some notions are completely different from quantum mechanics and standart model like symmetries, observable... I think the author search for help.
  14. No idea. But the theory defines some kind of observables. It use a prabability. So we can calculate mean, standart deviation...
  15. It's about rules. Il think the rules must be rational. we are always sqrt(x)2=x.
  16. It's a hypothesis. I think Loop Quantum Gravity use a discrete space and time. Because the theory use a well definited states for all noktons. The probability of displacements forces us to take all possible paths. k -x ( i,t, Γ ) = .... /D(i,j,t, Γ ) 4
  17. There is no contradiction because it used with D^4. For heisenburg principale, I don't have any idea but, it's possible to discover onther form of this principale.
  18. First, can space and time both discret, unlike general relativity. Second, I found that the idea resolve the measurement problem in quantum mechanis.
  19. Recently I found a paper about new theory. It seems a kind of digital physics. The paper is located at this link http://figshare.com/articles/Nokton_theory/1549720 Is it a good candidate to be a theory of everything ?
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.