Jump to content

0exegesis

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About 0exegesis

  • Birthday 08/09/1983

Profile Information

  • Location
    Netherlands
  • Favorite Area of Science
    dimensional relatives, philosophy, superpositions, golden ratio..

0exegesis's Achievements

Lepton

Lepton (1/13)

-1

Reputation

  1. Sound has much less density of a vibration than light has, no wonder it bounces off glass.
  2. As my short idea about the subject; light and sound are one and the same, the vibration is simply so high it deflects other vibrations, and with higher volume it generates heat, we are in the wave pathway of the sun afterall, and so when electrically emitting sound/vibration/light these waves travel like sound does aswell. If we could discern the extremely high pitch of light's micro frequency with our ears we would probably go mad during the day.
  3. Im sure i have enough mathematical understanding to map geometric form, besides i might not write in formula, i understand quite the intermediate concept.
  4. Oh its all fine, I dont expect emediate responses. I do think that music theory with focus on ratio and correleance with cymatic properties should be part of the science curriculum on the same universe of mathematics, and id love to be part of that type of research. There is also a side of me that sees its application as already possible, perhaps already known beside the public.. Its all the building blocks of matter and with it our reality.
  5. As someone with a classical music background who has studied golden ratio and such mathematical universe once stumbled on something called the rosslyn motet, though questionable it did open up a new way of thinking about musical logic and sound. After a long time of testing theory i came to the conclusion that im sure others have made before me (sadly i had no access to library's of this nature so had to figure it out myself) that sound has physical property wich may explain why when its vibrations resonate through us we can discern 'correct' patterns/chords/note correleance and 'false' ones. Afterall, each note has a tremor frequency wich may or may not resonate with another. I have also through this developed an interest in subjects such as the 'third voice' wich technically could be considered the offspring that bounces off two conflicting wavepatterns. Im sure some of you have as a child with a friend yelled at eachother in monotone discovering that third voice sounding loudly inbetween, in another manner perhaps overtone singing is created by a similar mechanism; creating two voices that brings forth' not an illusion but an actual third wave pattern. Back to cymatics; I thusfar figured through study that every pitch has its own geometric shape, that may very well resonate with the same geometry that matter consists of. Afterall is it not said that 'first there was the word, and the word was god' wich when set in the context of the physical property of sound opens up quite the window.. The same logic applied to sound geometry is there when it comes to the forming of matter. I could go further into this and state that the forming of planets may well be accounted to the background noise of gasses, and even their trajectory possibly is decided by this. Music as we know today has devolved into the abstract, it is hardly physically utilized, and much can be blamed on sheer lack of education followed by stupendous distraction (greed that through the industry uses music as a comoddity rather than a science) Im quite a curious fellow and cant stop wondering about the knowledge lost in the past; for instance when you look at tone range used in ancient civilisations' of wich some has survived in for instance asia and arabia, it is vastly more complicated where the western world though through scientific approach created a very narrow range to work with (dictated by the golden ratio).. (this is not criticism, im very, very fond of the golden ratio.) When you look at sound in the primal sense; as physical. What is the difference between such range and our western golden ratio? Where did we go wrong in thinking that music, and ultimately sound.. was something seperate from ourselves? Perhaps we are instruments, afterall the voice has the range of nearly all instruments thinkable.. and why is that so? Why would the voice have evolved to be able to reproduce every single pitch relevant to our 'material' world? The so called energy we consist of; wich travels through our brain's ever increasing connections is its own microcosmos made of wave's and their relations, the body's mechanisms therein are no different than a composition of a logical musical-piece. These are things that i am..somewhat obsessed with both from my work as a composer, a sound sciences and physics interested and a philosopher as we all are when we put our mind to it.. What bothers me is that i do not have a laboratory where i can do research.. i sadly lack the equipment let alone money to build it.. If anyone from the netherlands with knowledge of these things would like to get in contact with me on this subject and thinktank on such research i would be quite happy to. ..Things i would really like to test are; the types of geometric patterns created by the third voice' such as overtone singing.. Also the systematic documenting of specific toneladder notes geometric shapes and their relation to eachother to map the physical properties of every single tone. Then also compare the effect of such patterns on molecular samples. I hope my introduction where i shared my thoughts on the subject wasnt too confusing, or god forbid chaotic. I do apoligise for not knowing all the right scientific terms, as i've explained i am coming from a composers world' not a science university. (although they are quite alike) -Daniel.
  6. Apoligies for bumping this discussion but even i can see these animated specs of light and have my thoughts about them that i would like to share. First off i need to insist these are definately not eye floaters, wich are mostly see through and move at much slower speed, practically drifting and easily discerned by eye movement. They might be somewhat influenced by focus, perhaps bloodpressure in the sense that your receptors pick them up easier, as ive had them almost blot at times when i stood up from a chair and went to the bathroom. (not to be confused with lightheadedness) but they definately show up in enviroments where light travels such as between the space of a doorway. What we are seeing 'might actually literally be the components of light traveling before our eyes receptors, so animated pure energy. I have not a single time in my life seen these particles at pitch black night or any other point of day without light. They are not flashes, neither are they a visual snow. To reproduce it one simply has to reset their eye's focus in the same manner as trying to look at a stereoscopic image. One eye crooked so to speak' in the path of most preferably a bright natural light source. The particles are absolutely animated although it cannot be said if they are intelligent or move systemically, their movements don't seem to fit that latter model, makes me reconsider their quantum mechanics. As some people have noted in this discussion they literally phase in and out after short spurts of about half a second or less, making it impossible to follow one. I have yet to notice a distinct absolute source. Though the link about the blue field phenomenon seems close to the truth, i am a hundred percent sure that it has nothing to do with anything blue, as i personally have seen these particles in every enviroment with a bright light path present regardless of any tint of blue present. I feel like this subject needs to be observed disconnected from floaters and neurological problems. Thank you for your time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.