gamefreek_01

i mean to say that time is not a dimension i mean that it is impossilbe to change time but only to count it, with length and width and hieght those are effectable changing the object. Although yes if you slow down an object the time it takes to do something will increase and vise verusa but that doesnt mean that you can literally go back or forward in time with increasing yuor speed youll only be able to do things faster but things like aging will still effect you.

personally people i think you guys are trying not to engage the actual problem of arguing with me so yuo make me seem as dumb as yuo can because yuo cant compete with my theories or ideas

oh lol i dont know how to spell inconveniencing and i meant to saying i do not beleive he is correct

lol you make me sound like a little kid although thank you for standing up for my rights, and my age is only 14 and i live in canada, ontario, windsor

oh and to capn refsmmat them proving it could be because of luck or even indirect relation.

hmm well i see your point on my spelling and stuff ill take that into account as i type out this and any other posts. sry for inconviencing you. Now i like to think of what i have been saying as being theories because i have thought about this alot looking around the internet and i have talked to people about some or this and aurgued i call these my theories because thats what i beleive through all the thiknig ive put into it. isnt that what a theory is a persons beleive on a topic. Not a speculation. Although i dont understand how einsteins theorys are scientifically fundemental but i do respect einstein, even though i had heard from my friend at school that it was actuly eisntiens wofe who could of made the theories. i respect einstein because he great ideas but they were correct i believe (ive only read general relativity indepthly so i only can relate to that theory) i beleive this because the plausiblity of time being a dimension is wrong which i had talked about in a earlier post also the way that moving through space to create gravity could not work espically for all objects in the universe because they would need to move for this to be even a small bit correct. And yes scientist that have degrees and such do tip the favours for them but in some ways might tip it for me where the scientists are to fond of the things they learned where it makes them close minded which appears alot.

while i didnt understand a bit of yuor question ill tell yuo that even if scientists or anyone might have studied and studied for years that doesnt mean that im wrong or there right they have to have the right mind to really think about atoms and give good thoeries, einsteins theroy is very implausible and other theories like big bang all are impluasible when i theorize try my hardest to make my explanation all make sense in terms of what a know about anything, and if it doesnt make any sense ill find where it doesnt and work around it with a new theory.

our 3 dimensions are the width length and height of an object or piece of matter which gives us information on its apperance time how ever gives us information on something that not only can be infinit( an object can do anything at infinit different times where as one single object only has one set of dimensions) be also time tells about how long a object does something time however tells us nothing about an actual object only what its doing( how long is donig it) thus time is not a dimension.

to answer your question kotake einstein theories such as how gravity has to do with space time curvature is very implausible nothing could work like that first because time is not a dimension of reality but a measurement of how fast we do things, and second even if time wasnt just a measurement then the movement of bodies through psace would not create gravity. and also i probly should not say mark's theories becasue i had only read his free chapter which only gives reasons why gravity is wrong not what he thinks it is these theories are mine i suppose but also the theory someone had siad mark had given for gravity would be wrong, the expansion one.

when i inquire that that moslty wat scientists say is incorrect i am overemphasising the fact that scienctists are not giving the correct thinking on subjects of physics like gravity such as einstein and his outrageous theories.

i understnad that but if our consciousness is uncomprehendable and something that we might never figure out then why say it is impossible instead say that its the only reality we will ever know so just go along with it.

as someone said before he supposedly siad that gravity is caused by every thing expanding at the same time, i disagree with that but his ideas of how scientists are mostly wrong and arent thinking enough is what i agree with him.

actuly no when i mean science i mean apply scientific knowledge to nuderstanding whether or not the psychic ability is plausible.

these theories are of my own although mark may or may not have said the same. and yes the only solution to all these problems with endless energy and such is pressure where the second smallest particles smaller thna light are held together, alos made of the smallest partilces, are held together by a continuous force of other very small particles shotting around everywhere to keep these second smallest particles togther whcih these particles join together to make chains to mkae gravity andm agtentism and weka nuclear force

lol i just said the movement of the particles which create force on other particles to keep them together to make the whole substance stay solid

its the only solutino to this conudrum that is not too far fetched

the particles that create the pressure are preforming owrk to keep the particles stuck together whcih in turn holds everything together resisting the other forces agaisnt the whole object

consciousness is very simple we as people pcik up information from our sensesgiving us stilumation making us active this stimulation stimulates our brain where we comprehend the information acording to our own memory and other stiluation in our body this is consciusness its perseption from our body and understanding of our brain. we understand things because of our brain which makes us think and react and collect info and our body gives us info and is what we act through yuo only know who yuo are by the info yuo pick up about yuor slef.

Hello people i would like to give my opinion and say i dont beilve in all psychic powers like pyro kenisis and telekinesis and telepathy is probly possilbe, in disscussions like these its better to anylse the sceince in it and not the tests like our brian cells emit brain waves which could likley be picked up by other people aroound us while predicting the future or such is implausible

sry for my large amonuts of spelling mistakes i tend to make mistakes when i type fast

to thing with the table, all the author is saying is that all particles in the universe like molecules stay together endlessly with no visible power sorce to hold them together this is the main flaw of every. If yuo wonder to speculate on how this could go on yuo could say that the particles would be linked together in chains stukc together, thats what i thikn gravity andm agnetism is , although there might be one problem those particles that make up gravity and magnetism must be held to gether by sometihng, as yuo get small and smaller yuo have to keep explaining the force with particles stuck together in chains so the only way this endless explaination would be the only force in nature that only relies on other particles to push the particles together called pressure.

lol mark is the author of the book we were arguing about. yuor right but thats not a very applicable thing its not like its going to happne or would need to be understood at alll but i see yuo are right,

i would like to defend mark because me and him share similar views on these topics. so first of all a have to say if something fel through the earth it would move back and forth down the hole through the earth till the gravity slows down the object to a halt in the core.