Jump to content

danno180

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by danno180

  1. That was a passing reflection on a comment. I don't see future matter as fitting into the mechanics of observable phenomena but I do see past matter as still having influence (perhaps what we are describing as dark matter). I see entropy as the main "fuel" so to speak that puts everything in motion and the organization of matter nothing more than eddys that form as matter and energy attempt to move to a state of absolute entropy if that can even occur (that pile of dirt dug to make a pit in the ground wants to go back into that hole and even out). People are stating its in the mathematics of which I am quite certain it is but I only have a Biochemistry degree and that level of math would take lifetimes of study hence posting my ideas online and if any of it fits, good, if not, who is harmed? I wrote this response on a comment from Strange but fits here as well: ... I don't see future matter as fitting into the mechanics of observable phenomena but I do see past matter as still having influence (perhaps what we are describing as dark matter). I see entropy as the main "fuel" so to speak that puts everything in motion and the organization of matter nothing more than eddys that form as matter and energy attempt to move to a state of absolute entropy if that can even occur (that pile of dirt dug to make a pit in the ground wants to go back into that hole and even out). People are stating its in the mathematics of which I am quite certain it is but I only have a Biochemistry degree and that level of math would take lifetimes of study hence posting my ideas online and if any of it fits, good, if not, who is harmed?
  2. Hmm, I suppose I could be seeing part (or all) of it wrong. If what I see has merit, matter in the universe shrinking by way of losing mass is incorrect, but rather it is becoming more compact giving the appearance of an expanding universe. If that were the case, then what is perceived as dark matter could be the effect future matter is having on matter today instead of past matter and why we can't see dark matter. "Non-existence" is my way of trying to label absolute entropy if that is even possible
  3. I like that quote from Newton. Even he was wrong on certain things but is still highly regarded. I'm not Newton, I'm not Einstein, and I'm not Hawking. I see relationships with space, time, energy, and matter.
  4. Who is this moderator? Adolf Hitler? I'm presenting a framework idea that is generalized not completely unrelated to Stephen Hawking describing how matter exists using the analogy of digging a hole and creating a hill, both sums equalling a net of zero. Ideas should not face the threat of deletion.
  5. Ok how do I explain what I see fluidly in my head? Where to begin relative to current understanding? The wave is the more basic concept of all that exists, positive and negative balancing out to equal practically nothing yet achieving something thru separation both equalling the opposite of each other whose net equals zero. Existence would seem to naturally move towards a point of non existence or zero again. This "movement" could be perceived as time or the change towards equilibrium/nothingness. Matter and energy are interchangeable because they are different states of organization of this wave function that composed what we perceive as existence. The expansion of the cosmos isn't truly expanding so much as the matter within it shrinking in a somewhat static space giving to the illusion items in the universe are getting further apart. Dark matter fits into this part if I am able to muddle thru my thoughts. The space time continuum in my view is a four dimensional contruct. As time moves towards non existence, matter loses mass compared to states it had earlier in time. Dark matter has gravitational influence in the universe but cannot be physically seen. Dark matter in my view may be the effect normal matter has on other lower energy states of matter that exist in the future, i.e. matter in the past influences space time today but "appears" invisible because it isn't in the present even though it is still part of the space time continuum
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.