Jump to content

fake

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by fake

  1. by "it" i mean the Cell because one of those things would be perfict to have in my invisibility suit design
  2. sounds pritty awesome how big is it?
  3. not verry.. but for my band we use smoke efects that u can get at party city or reely ne where that would be good to use.. i also know that there are colored dyes you can use that evaporate for those smoke machiens what are you testing in this wind tunnle?
  4. i just read the page and i figured that they have only desiphered a small bit of that "code" ;the balance part of it... i was once reely interested in enabling our brains to just think and input information.. i wanted to be the first person that would figure out exactly how and came up with this: you would need a device that reads the electrical signals of your brain to your body and the specific body parts.. also you would need to desipher the entire electrical mesaging code that makes certian parts of our body react (not so much the code itself but how it gets sent to what part of the body) within the past year i got a popular science mgazien that had a thing implanted in the back of a monkeys head that would "read its thoughts" and controle a joystick that would give it food... that killed all my plans because by the time i got into the field i figured they would get that down to a science and major breakthroughs would no longer be needed..
  5. im guesing that it would just be lilke how a computer reads what we are typing and converts it to html and then back or a telephone can get electronic signals into sound .. you just have to decode the body's electrical signals
  6. and what religon you are.... some people could believe that she was posesed and learned the conversations through that or some could believe it was an out of body experience.. what about all them super-scientific ppl with explenations.. the whole thing could be a hoax.. lets let a bunch of people post and we'll find out
  7. well all of what you believe about that depends on if your religous or not
  8. sry if its hard to understand most of my ideas are
  9. ok this should be it ... read it over add any ideas (from the original idea not like completly diferent concept all together please) or make changes and tell me what would be better
  10. also the real reason i put this thread under computer sciences is because i wanted the people of this site to help me figure out some things aobut the size of the computer chip that would recieve a signal and transmit it into light and also emit a signal and direct the flow of light to the diferent screens
  11. back from skol well ne ways.. i can try to post the ideas i have as far as all that other stuff i know that when it moves it wont be a problem.. i think cameras take 24 frames a second so the human eye cannot see the diference from one to the next, well with this the image would just change every 24 or more frames (the more frames per second the higher resolution.. also the more angles of flat screens the better the resolution) so it would be like 80 times everysecond.. like a radio pulse would be transmited and then every pulse would have diferent images on its information...
  12. yea i think u would use fiber optics because each screen would be like i said before a semi-sphere of hundreds of flat screens you would need microscopic fiberoptic cables to bring the ilght strait into the thing that is showing the light
  13. "OLED's technology advantage is that it's very bright, has a higher contrast than LCD, and is good for moving pictures," - the problem with that is i dont want it to be bright, only as bright as the light that is being emited behind it.. i want it so you can shine a flashlight through the suit and still have no problems with seeing strait through it .. the screens would be more like gameboy screens than tv screens. if u ever seen a gameboy they dont emit light they only show the image as where a tv would light up a room...
  14. its hard to undersand what im saying im pritty sure i got all the bugs worked out as far as if it will be viewable from any angle and even problems like emiting a shadow... my only problem is what kind of computer microchips would be used and is it posible to transmit that much data through the air without geting mixed signals .. there would be literaly millions of flat screens in a suit..and about the visibility of the cameras ..even if they were microscopic a whole bunch of them would look like a haze floating in air.. i need to solve that problem too.. im not too sure that it might be a problem though (still good to solve it ne ways)
  15. actualy no, the cameras would be on both sides... you see the suit would have two sides each with cameras each with screens remember how i was saying about that sort of tesselation thing of screens around a camera.. well it would go throughout the whole suite so you can see from any angle and still be unseen .. as for the wieght the cameras would be incredibly small and the computers that would be used to direct the images would be too... it would be like carying around how ever many flat-screen monetors would cover your body exept probably less ... i have a drawing how can i get it online.. i have a scanner
  16. sry for ne ms spelings or mesed up gramer i can type all propor but i dont rely care to cuz its a waste of time..
  17. i was just bored so i tried figuring out a better way to make things apear invisible... i saw that one japaneese guy's thing and thought it was crap cuz u could see shadows n stuf and wanted to make my own way.. only problem: it would cost too much well ne ways heres the basic idea : you have a small camera with hundreds of surfaces (so reely its hundreds of small cameras) all on a semi-sphere that get sent to the parallell screen on the oposite side of the suit/vehical/ w/e and then it gets displayd that way. the screens would be a little biget than the camera and blend many camera signals together to form one picture.. so from no matter what angle you look at it you see directly through the object.. the cameras would be fit in a polygon around each camera and then the same polygon around each polygon lets call that a unit.. so hundreds of these units would make up a suit and each unit would be about the size of a pixle on the computer your looking at right now.. ill go into details with the light n stuff in later posts but tell me if the general idea is good or not..
  18. if kerry was in office right now people would be talking bad about him right now too.. no matter what people are going to be unhappy thats just the way it works... with one political party youll have people protesting, with the other party youll have the other people protesting.. thats how the system works; eternal unrest, every four years another person comes into power and everyone gets mad.. hmm well dosent that just suck.. cuz last i checked it isnt the rest of the worlds country.. what you are saying might be true but you also have to realize that its not suposed to be the rest of the world making calls for us... if you want something done right do it yourselves ok well i was just passing by and couldnt help puting in my say about polotics (how ever u spell it)
  19. i figure with our form of govronment whoever the president is is just the lesser of two evils, no one can please everyone
  20. to whoever made this thread : do you think the kerry administration would have done any better?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.