cdcrane82

So this is it? Let the enlightenment begin! You say there is no evidence for young earth creationism. I say there is no evidence for old earth or evolution. I say there are all kinds of things that we can see in nature, and these can be interpreted in different ways, depending on your preconceived notions of how the world works. The "evidence" itself isn't enough to prove one or the other without taking the logistics into account. For example, just because you can connect the dots on your "tree of life" doesn't meant that it's actually possible for one animal to evolve into another. All I'm saying is that there isn't anything in this world that is contrary to a young earth creation view. I don't deny the existence of the Galapagos islands. What about them is only possible by evolution?