Jump to content

esecallum

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by esecallum

  1. WHAT TO DO IF YOU CONTRACT ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT MRSA.

     

    With MRSA infections increasing rapidly in and out of hospitals the below information will save your life and limb if followed carefully after other options like pharamaceutical drugs have failed you.

     

    You should always consult a registered health practitioner and use the below information as a last resort although using it earlier may help you to avoid complications as the treatment is not harmful if followed as below.

     

    It is non-patentable , non-drug based and therefore not profitable for established pharmaceutical companies.

     

    Your doctor will dismiss it automatically but you should do your own research using a search engine like google.

     

     

    If you are infected with antibiotic resistant MRSA and wish to save your limb and life then the following set of instructions will save your life.I suggest you save this information and pass it around.

     

    If a limb has become infected with MRSA and your doctor suggests amputation and if you dont want it amputated then wash the effected limp in warm water and scrub gently away any dead surface skin cells.

     

    While the limb is still wet put it in a thick plastic bag and seal it in with sellotape around the edges so thats its airtight.

     

    Next get a the hose from an Ozone generator and make a small hole in the bag and seal it with sellotape to make it airtight.

     

    Then switch on the ozone generator and leave it on for from 1 to 4 hours depending on severity of infection.

     

    You can repeat the treatment over a few days for very acute cases.

     

    The ozone gas will kill any MRSA on the skin and transdermal zxone will go through the skin and kill any MRSA inside the limb.

     

    Its a good idea to open the windows while you are ozonating the limp as ozone is not good for the lungs.

     

     

    If the infection is not in a limb which can be easily wrapped in a plastic bag then do the up to the neck ozone bagging again using sellotape to seal the bag at the neck so its airtight.Use a large thick binliner and stand in it while a friend/relation seals you up.Again open the windows.

     

    But have a warm bath prior to ozone bagging and again to speed things up a gentle scrubbing to remove dead skin before bagging.

     

    You will find this saves your limb and life.

     

    Ozone generators can be purchased from google and can cost from £160 upwards and last a very long time.

     

    The generator costing around £160 or $200 will be more then adequate as long as the ozone output is around 200 to 300 mg/hour.

     

    Drinking ozonated cold water will increase the elimination of the MRSA infection and associated toxins even more quickly.

     

    I suggest you all look up medical ozone in google or transdermal ozone or ozone bagging or variations thereof.

     

    This will give you additional research materiels

     

    I already have an ozone generator and routinely drink ozonated water to keep healthy.The water gives you a slightly heady feeling as if you had too much oxygen for a few seconds after you drink it.

     

    The point of this information is to enable you to save your own life and limb after other options have failed you.

     

    You should save this information as a text file and spread it around.

  2. There IS a vaccine for aids.

     

    It works on monkeys and the like' date=' (sorry no link yet)

     

    Its a weakened version of the Aids virus, and could save millions.

     

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2115217.stm

     

    ?[/quote']

     

    every vaccine will fail as the Aids virus is poor at reproducing itself INSIDE the body and the new copies are all slightly different inside the body too.

     

    this was explaine in a Horizon programme too.

     

    Vaccines wont work.

     

    a trial study 8 weeks ago failed.

     

    another study in india is due shortly.

     

    i predict it will fail too.

     

    or be very narrow in range and become useless very quickly.

  3. the only thing even close to that idea is the use of Platinum based medication is some cancers.

     

    as for voltage use' date=' there was experimentation done in the late 70s early 80`s about the use of a low current passed between 2 broken bones to assist in the bridging of them, it worked in quite a few cases, I`ve heard nothing about it since though, si I assume the result were`nt worrth the effort?

    similar things where done in severed nerves, I`ve no data on that either.

     

    the only other time in medicine is ECT, and I don`t think that`s used now?[/quote']

     

     

    http://www.bioelectric.ws/eng/electro-news.html

  4. These test groups are far too small to be of any use. Theres also an unequal amount of people in the groups. This experiment is rubish at best. The only thing funnier then seeing how ridiculous they are' date=' is that people actually take them seriously.

     

    Some people's ignorance almost scares me.[/quote']

     

    4000 group of women too small?

     

     

    when doing election polls in the uk they frequently use groups of 1000 people only and they claim an accuracy of +/- 3%.

     

    of course they would have taken into account the slight inequality in the group sizes.

     

    this was more than 4000 women and the difference between bra bearers and non bra wearers was a staggering 12500%.

     

    a factor of 125 times

     

    there is no possible way you can explain the huge difference due to life styles,diet.

     

    life style and diet studies relating to cancer always tend to be in the range of 20% to 60% at most.

     

    this is 12500%.

     

    how do YOU explain this?

     

     

     

    "some peoples ignorance scares me". lol

     

    me too.

  5. Although I think the above is BS, there is anacdotal evidence from quite a number of people in Australia that they have been "cured" of the symptoms of the moquito-borne virus Ross River Fever after recieving shocks from faulty equipment, electric fences, etc. It would certainly be an area of possible interest to research scientists.

     

    no its not bs.

     

    if you check the actual research in the link its all explained very very carefully and in great detail in scientific terms.

     

    i note many people have not done it or found it incomprehensible to understand in the 30 seconds they took to scroll thru down a very very long page.

     

    then they spent more than 30 seconds posting saying its "bs".

     

    more than anecdotal evidence exist for your mosquito virus fever.

     

    a trial study in Nigeria for malaria found great succes.

     

    no electric shocks involved.

     

    about 0.025 amps is the starting point to electrocute a person.

     

    a small steady current in the range (0.0003 to 0.001 amps maximum) is passed thru electrodes attached to wrist pulse points.

    the current direction is reversed every few minutes.

     

     

    http://forum.aidworkers.net/messages/141/141.html?1105057020

  6. Then what is your purpose here?

     

    to make people aware that this non drug based method exists and for people to pursue it in further study etc....

     

     

    this was explained in the starting post.

     

    its lamentable people cannot properly read and comprehend whats been written and th information supplied via the links

    before rushing to launch petty attacks.

     

    in any case i just found out company has started using the procedure to cure Hep-C.

     

    the treatment lasts only 6 weeks instead of the indefinite use of drugs with toxic side effects and a high mortality rate.

     

    I understand Pamela Anderson has Hep-C. Somebody should inform her and collect a suitable reward......

     

    lol lol

  7. Hello everyone!

     

    In this thread we will talk about malaria' date=' and share our great knowledge with each other.

     

    let me go first :D

     

    Malaria is the most dangerous diseas, if you are infected by malaira you will die soon. It envades our immune system when a mosquito trys to play with our boddy. When it is done with its work, it lefts us behind with a disease named malaria. And we start thinking about to save our life, which can't be possible...[/quote']

     

    Lets not talk about malaria.

    Lets cure it.

     

    http://forum.aidworkers.net/messages/141/141.html?1105057020

  8. No' date=' they are not.

     

    They are waiting for the citations, and the results of the study. You know, "peer review"?[/quote']

     

    results already given.

    the FDA wanted $200 million to do more clinical studies after big pharma got wind of it and they realised what would would happen to ther azt drug sales...

  9. those links lead to complete and utter rubish.

     

    Everyone be careful of drug addicts posts.they are rubbish .his education is woefully inadequate.

     

    a factor of 125 is 125% to him!

     

     

    The below studies were done in Germany where there is less of a stranglehold by big pharma companies who would lose out by $10000 to $100000 per patient if non drug based cancer therapy was used.

     

     

    Alternative cancer treatment with few side effects: The Electro Carcinoma Therapy (ECT)

     

    Original article in german: http://www.naturmednet.de/krebs/tumor.ect.html

     

    The Electro-Carcinoma Therapy is a form of tumor treatment that is hardly known. So far, some empirical values and a first study are present. The Institute for Natural Health Methods in Marburg Germany uses ECT.

     

    The principle: A weak direct current is applied to the tumors, which can shrink, as a direct consequence and even disappear completely.

     

    From China came the first results of a larger case study which uses the ECT treatment with over 10,000 patients in the period of 1987 to 2000. One of the central results: in just over 30% of the cases, it brought about the dissolution of the tumors, and in somewhat more than 40%, to the reduction of the tumor. The individual success values hang thereby, among other things on the kind of tumor and size as well as the stage of the illness.

    The Chinese medical profession apply the energy in particular by means of platinum wire electrodes, in the form of needles, injected directly into the tumors. In contrast; the Marburg Institute works almost exclusively with plate formed metal electrodes applied to the skin. "the use of plates is gentler, possesses a higher acceptance with the patients and is just as effective as the therapy with needles", explains Dr. Bernhard Weber, head of the institute. First intermediate results of the local treatments seem to confirm theesults of the Chinese study.

     

    The Electro-Carcinoma Therapy is a local, low side-effect procedure that can be treated on an outpatient basis. In the two to three hour treatment, energy flows through the tumor. Some patients need only two or three sessions before the tumour will "melt", others need more. With the help of a special computer monitor program and controls, the physician controls the treatment and observes the procedures in the body and the growth. The medical skill lies in being able to place the electrodes in the correct location and setting of the optimal amperage - this must be different depending upon tumor size, density and type.

     

    ECT can and should be used, depending upon illness, together with other forms of treatment. In order to control the formation of secondary growths (metastases) with malicious tumors, Dr. Weber advises to combine the use of ECT with radio and/or chemotherapy. ECT does not replace good conventional therapy possibilities; on the other side ECT can be a new therapeutic chance where conventionally difficult or hardly treatable tumors and secondary growths are present.

     

    ECT is suitable for both surface as well as more deeply located tumours, explains the Institute. Secondary growths in bones cannot be treated as effectively with this method. Even if the tumor has already been pre-treated with irradiation or chemotherapy, the Electro Carcinoma Therapy can still be used.

     

    Further information:

    Institut für Naturheilverfahren & Naturheilkunde-Tagesklinik mit Schmerzambulanz

    (Institut for natural health method & naturopathy outpatient hospital with pain clinic)

    Contact: Dr. Bernhard Weber, email: b.weber@firemail.de

    Uferstr. 1, 35037 Marburg, Germany

    Tel: +49 6421 68430; FAX: +49 6421 684350

     

    Literature on ECT:

    Dr. med. Rudolf Pekar: Die perkutane Bio-Elektrotherapie bei Tumouren (The percutaneous bio electrical therapy with tumours). Vienna, Munich, Berlin 1996.

    Dr. med. Rudolf Pekar/Dr. med. Nikolai N. Korpan: Cancer. Vienna, Munich, Berne 2002.

     

    Source: http://www.klinik-st-georg.de/englisch/ELEKTRO.HTM

     

    Quote:

    Electro Cancer Treatment (ECT)

    I. Introduction

    Electro medicine has been widely used for many years, especially in orthopedics where it has been used for regeneration, i. e., to increase the healing process in broken bones (1) and pain purposes. In Oncology, however, the use of electromedicine (ECT) is relatively new and stems from research investigations of Pekar (2) and Nordenström (3). Since 1987, St. George Hospital has treated hundred of patients with this method of treatment. Direct current can be directed into tumorous tissue (skin metastases, lymph node metastases or isolated organ metastases) through the application of electrodes. If the total amount of direct current is high enough, this procedure results in the destruction of cancerous cells and in extreme cases, no necrotization.

     

    II. Physical-chemical principles of ECT

    As soon as direct current is connected to the electrodes, different electrochemical reactions influence the pH-value and can cause electrolysis of tumor tissue. Depolarization of the cell membranes changes the cellular environment forcing the tumor cells to be gently destroyed. Consequence of this process is the interruption of certain functions within the cancerous cells, which in turn, can lead to the destruction of these cells. Tumor tissue is more susceptible to damage from direct current than normal tissue, thus allowing the destruction of cancerous cells to occur when direct current is applied directly to the malignant tissue. The body `s own catabolic processes remove the destroyed malignant tissue from the body. It is also possible that through this process the immune system starts fighting all other cancer cells within the body. Once ECT or Galvano (as it is commonly known) treatment is successfully completed, the cancerous area heals and is replaced with scar tissue.

     

    III. What types of tumor are suitable for ECT?

    ECT is suitable for all types of superficial or deep seated tumors, which can be reached by needle electrodes. Specifically, however, are:

    - small breast carcinomas or isolated axillary, supraclavicular and thoracic nodes.

    - all tumors of the ENT area, especially after radiation or chemotherapy.

    - skin carcinomas e. g. Basaliome, Spinocellular carcinoma, Melanoma etc.

    - gynecological carcinomas

    - soft tissue tumors

     

    IV. Special form of ECT using cytostatic substances (Iontophoresis)

    The destructive effect of the direct current on tumorous tissue can be enhanced by the simultaneous administration of cytostatic substances, for example, Mitomycin, Adrimycin, Epirubicin and Cis-Platinium. Most cytostatic substances are positively charged, which when inserted onto the anode in an electrical field directed through tumorous tissue move to the cathodes (iontophoresis movement). In this way, cytostatics can be introduced into the tumorous tissue in a very targeted and concentrated manner. This method can be more effective on the tumor side than standard systemic chemotherapy or local cytostatic perfusion. Cytostatic substances are best applied to hollow organs, for example, esophagus, bladder, stomach and rectum. The membrane potentials are changed so much by the current that the cells open and absorb cytostatic substances more rapidly.

     

    V. How is the treatment carried out?

    Normally the treatment is carried out under local anaesthetic and on an outpatient basis. The size of the tumor determines how many needle electrodes are required, however, a minimum of 2 are always used. These are introduced into the tumor through the skin. The electrodes should not be further than 1.5cm apart. The minimum required electric field must be 35 coulombs/ml although up to 90 coulombs/ml are normally used. During the treatment, the patient will experience a slight pressure pain or a slight tingling in the treated area. Direct current brings about long lasting pain relief because it inhibits the activity of sensory nerve fibers. Therefore there is no pain after treatment. However because the cancerous tissue is being destroyed through this method of treatment, it is normal that inflammation occurs for a couple of days afterwards. The cancerous tissue is broken down naturally, which when eliminated from the body is replaced by scar tissue. Superinfections rarely occur. ECT replaces operations and radiation treatment. Judging by the very positive therapy results, it can be assumed, that ECT will become an important form of treatment for malignant diseases.

     

    Literature

    - Senn E. Electro therapy, Thieme-Verlag

    - Pekar R. Percutaneous galvano therapy of tumors, Verlag W.Maudrich, Vienna-Munich-Bern

    - Nordenström BEW The European Journal of Surgery Suppl. 577, Pg 93-109 Scandinavian University Press

    - Douwes F. R. The basics of electrochemical cancer treatment 1994

    - Szasz. A. Advanced alternative medicine AAM-Series

    - Pleasnicar A. Electric treatment of human melanoma skin lesions with low level direct current. The European Journal of Surgery Suppl 574, Pg 45-49. Scandinavian University press.

    - Yunqin Song Electrochemical treatment in the treatment of malignant tumors on the body surface. The European Journal of Surgery Suppl 574, Pg 41-43. Scandinavian University Press.

    - Kuanhong Quan Analysis of the clinical effectiveness of 144 cases of soft tissue and superficial malignant tumors treated with electrochemical therapy. The European Journal of Surgery Suppl 574, Pg 37-40. Scandinavian University Press.

     

    As you can see loads of references and research papers.

  10. Actually' date=' this is complete and utter bollocks, as is the rest of the stuff he's posted. And apparently, according to his posts on the BBC science message boards wearing a bra increases risk of breast cancer by 125%. http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-perl/h2/h2.cgi?thread=%3Cmod.1104704094-17675.25%40forum1.thdo.bbc.co.uk%3E&find=%3Cmod.1104704094-17675.25%40forum1.thdo.bbc.co.uk%3E&board=science.headlines&sort=Te

    Amazing the stuff some people come up with!

     

    can a mod/admin either move his stuff to pseudoscience so we can all laugh at it or get rid of him please? Cheers[/quote']

     

     

    why was my post moved at the request of someone who cant even do simple math? .a factor of 125 is not 125%.

     

    the bra study was as

    follows:-

     

    "In the early 1990s Singers studied 4,500 women in 5 cities across the U.S. about their habits in purchasing and wearing bras. Though his study did not take into account other lifestyle factors, the results are too striking to be denied:

     

    * 3 out of 4 women who wore their bras 24 hours per day developed breast cancer.

    * 1 out of 7 women who wore bras more than 12 hour per day but not to bed developed breast cancer.

    * 1 out of 152 women who wore their bras less than 12 hours per day got breast cancer.

    * 1 out of 168 women who wore bras rarely or never acquired breast cancer.

     

    So the difference between 24 hour wearing and not at all was 125-fold!

     

    125 fold =12500% thats right 12500%. not 125% as the "drug addict" alleged.he cant even understand junior school arithmetic.

     

    and the mods moved my post at HIS request?

     

    I ASK THE MODS TO MOVE IT BACK.

     

    my post was based on science and trial studies.but none of you actually bothered to check it being too busy bashing each other.

     

    also some of the posters can barely string a paragraph together making broad sweeping statements like "rubbish".

     

     

    The moderators seem to be under the spell of drug addicts.

  11. According to what I read' date=' the sickle cell anemia is caused by substitution of one nucleotide and it is common on Africa and Asia, especially to African people because of resistance to malaria.

     

    I'm not sure I understood what that means. I'll add the quote from the book.

     

     

     

    Also, does this relate to the person's bloodtype also? Maybe this isn't too smart question but does the Landsteiner's bloodtype (which is just another name for common bloodtypes, A,B, AB, and O), influence to the person's bloodtype?

     

    Thanks for the replies.

     

    Happy Holidays[/quote']

     

    http://forum.aidworkers.net/messages/141/141.html?1105057020

  12. "A method and apparatus for destroying blood borne pathogens is disclosed which utilizes a low intensity direct current to generate positive particles from various metals which destroy viral pathogens. A first electrode comprised of a metal such as silver is inserted into a patient's venous system. Then, a second electrode is placed on the patient's exterior in the vicinity of the first electrode. A low intensity direct current is applied to the first metal electrode which releases silver cations to be bonded to the virus, resulting in the denaturing of the virus. The first electrode is placed in the venous system of the infected patient via a catheter".

     

     

    Dear Sirs

    I cannot post the whole text as its very long and detailed.

     

    I will post the first few paragraphs and a link to it at another site.

     

    The main problem with this cure is due to its extreme low cost.

     

    The low cost is detrimental to the sale of very expensive patented anti-Aids drugs which generate revenues from $5000 to $20000 per patient per year in the USA for pharmaceutical businesses.

     

    The cure is described below in detail and a trial study on humans and

    animals demonstrated its effectiveness and is included below in the links.The main thing to note is the extreme low cost and efficiency

    and broad spectrum use compared to drugs.

     

    I ask people in this forum to repeat the experiments to satisfy

    themselves and implement this cure.

     

    If you cannot do this then I ask you to please inform other people

    who may be able or in a position to do so.Especially young open minded doctors in third world countries.

     

    The cure has broad spectrum applications and is not confined to Aids

    but many other infectious blood related diseases as explained below

    including Hep-C.

     

    This device can easily be miniturised to fit on the wrist or arm and

    in essence consists of nothing more than a silver needle inserted

    into the vein and an extremely small current passed from this needle

    electrode to another flat electrode in contact with the surface of

    the skin.

     

    A simple low cost microchip could control the on/off cycle of this

    very small current and its very low level as detailed below.

     

    We can nowadays buy a DVD player for about $35 and this contains

    motors,transformers,lasers,complex microchips,decoding

    software,wires,resistors,etc and all this for only $35!

     

    The device below is about 10000 times less complicated and only uses

    a few components and can easily be mass produced for a few dollars or

    even cents.

     

    It uses a single ordinary 1.5 AA battery as a current source and a variable resistor in series to reduce the current down to the 0.000001 amp range.The battery life is very long as a result.

     

    A simple circuit or microchip can be made to automatically switch

    on/off this very small current to the small pure silver needle

    inserted into a vein and or monitor it to keep it within preset

    levels as described below.Alternatively the current can be manuelly monitered using a meter and a timer.

     

    There is considerable scope for further innovation and expermentation using this method to simplify it even more.

     

    The same device can be used repeatedly on different patients after

    replacing/sterilising the pure silver needle.

     

    I hope you can see the cost implications per patient as compared to patented expensive consumable drugs with toxic side effects and understand the political and economic significance of this extreme low cost.

     

    My sole motivation is to help people with blood bourne diseases.

     

    All your questions can be answered in the above text and the below urls.you will need to read the fully detailed methodology and modus operandi text in the below links a few times before it becomes clear and fully understood.

     

    It is suggested very strongly a biophysics student group is set up to further research and implement this cure.The costs are extremely low and no specialised,expensive, complex equipment is required.

     

     

    copy/paste the below very,very,long url carefully:-

     

    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,539,252.WKU.&OS=PN/6,539,252&RS=PN/6,539,252

     

    full schematics in below pdf file which should be saved in addition to saving the above webpage..

     

    http://www.itsmyplace.com/area51/06539252_1.PDF

     

     

    Additional evidence can be supplied to further prove the method works.

     

    Yours Sincerely ,

    Dr E .Callum

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.