Jump to content

ET

Members
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Neutral

About ET

  • Rank
    Lepton
  • Birthday 08/11/1970

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Location
    Ca
  • Interests
    Everything!
  • College Major/Degree
    MS
  • Favorite Area of Science
    QM
  • Occupation
    Programmer
  1. I don't know about whether a Scientifically credible site would use the term nuke or not, but I believe I've seen it used in magazines like Scientific American. In any case the site is a pretty imaginative use of nano-technology. With such technology exploring billions of stars may not be so impossible after all. By the same token if there is an intelligence in our galaxy capable of such ability, then maybe, just maybe they're already here, just a thought. ET
  2. I like the way the ETs arrived and the Fatima explination isn't too bad either. Ruling the world with just microscopic spaceships. ET
  3. Here's a site with a different bend, I find the ideas kinda...well...kinda possible, not in the context that the site says but more like what the future might be. http://luvinspoon.tripod.com ET
  4. Isn't time cause and effect? I mean Einstein theory wouldn't work unless time was cause and effect. The whole point is the curved geometry under gravity and under motion is the increased length between two points. So things like the future and the past aren't real dimensions. Without something happening there is no time, why time can be altered by other means other than just motion or gravity. If you freeze someone or something for instance you've slowed reactions (cause and effect) which is time. I think a lot of people view time as a flow or even a dimension, why there are notions of time travel. No matter how much mathematics you use to prove GR allows time travel the error is the improper use of time as a spatial dimension. Remember time is a reaction, cause and effect, not a line where by one can travel along like a dimension. Oh and I did see the PBS special with all the physics big wigs. The big problem using the wormhole, in GR at least, is the time dilation happens at the mouth of the hole and not to anything outside of the mouth. When the hole returns, it returns to the frame it had left! If you travel through the hole you would end up exactly where the hole is currently in time on earth. ET
  5. ET

    Time.

    Isn't time cause and effect? I mean Einstein theory wouldn't work unless time was cause and effect. The whole point is the curved geometry under gravity and under motion is the increased length between two points. So things like the future and the past aren't real dimensions. Without something happening there is no time, why time can be altered by other means other than just motion or gravity. If you freeze someone or something for instance you've slowed reactions (cause and effect) which is time. I think a lot of people view time as a flow or even a dimension, why there are notions of time travel. No matter how much mathematics you use to prove GR allows time travel the error is the improper use of time as a spatial dimension. Remember time is a reaction, cause and effect, not a line where by one can travel along like a dimension. ET;)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.