Jump to content

photoelectric effect


Theoretical

Recommended Posts

This is an important thread so students and others are not misled. People say I'm stirring the pot. Well, the pot needs to be stirred because there's some poison roaming around at the bottom.

 

Username "Mordred" recommended the following experiment, which needs emphasis so students and 8 to 5ers aren't misled:

 

Mordred, on 28 Aug 2015 - 12:12 AM, "said:

Here is some tests you can do at home.

http://www.google.ca...ekIT1oDkWgJVGxg"

 

As a side note, please question everything you read here, including all of the math I've posted, which BTW nobody has shown any errors. In my previous thread a user who supposedly has a PhD said force equals voltage, and the user Mordred recommended a photoelectric experiment which doesn't even contain the correct Planck's constant.

 

Anyhow, it is very important to know that academic science community has long since proven the photoelectric effect works perfectly well with the classical electromagnetic wave. The more experienced physicist have been known to get after people who suggest otherwise. It is very important to post this thread so people aren't misled. Of coarse academic community believes there's evidence to support the single quantize photon. For instance they believe blackbody radiation is evidence, but I am saying they are wrong. Blackbody radiation is easily derived from 100% classical mechanics! They claim classical mechanics cannot predict the atomic world, but I'm going to prove them wrong. A lot of documentation and work is required. Most of my time is spent on experiments and theoretical work for a new theory that explains in detail exactly the electric field and gravity. If true, then it means they are both caused by electromagnetic radiation in the fourth dimension.

 

Please read the following well excepted article within the science community, and question all users who even suggest the photoelectric effect offers evidence for the single quantized photon. And most importantly question quantum mechanics. Don't be a follower, because that leads to a religion.

 

Physics Forums Insights:

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/sins-physics-didactics/

Read the section "The photoelectric effect and the abuse of the notion of photons" and "Modern understanding of the photoelectric effect"

 

A quote for you "To describe induced transitions, in this case the absorption of a photon by an atom, molecule, or solid, we do not need to quantize the electromagnetic field at all but a classical electromagnetic wave will do, which we shall prove now in some detail."

 

I may not have time to post that often. Be cautious what people say here. I have caught them lying numerous times, saying there's an error in my math, but when I take the time to discuss it they never show the error. The full time posters here seem to have an agenda, like who's paying them to do anything within their power to suppress this truth lol? It's just weird.

 

In short, what does the photoelectric effect prove? It used to be the most monumental evidence for the photon according to the academic science community. Elbert Einstein god the Nobel prize for the photoelectric effect. Present day? Academic science community now finally knows it is not evidence for the so called photon. There you go. Evidence that the entire science community got the biggest thing wrong. So they can't say I must be wrong about my claims because I am one and they are many haha.

 

pa, Einstein should have got the Nobel prize for relativity. The photoelectric effect proves absolutely nothing in terms of photons!

 

Oh how I love this quote, "And most importantly question quantum mechanics. Don't be a follower, because that leads to a religion."

Edited by Theoretical
Link to comment
Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

 

No.

 

You have had two chances on this topic of how you can show that quantum mechanical results can be shown purely classically. Both were locked for lack of proper response to questioning and refusal to engage with counter arguments. It strikes me this is another rehash. Not gonna happen.

 

Thread locked.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.