Jump to content

Need Help with Symbolic Logic Proofs


need help

Recommended Posts

I am seriously lost with Proofs. I am allowed to use Rules of Inference (MP, MT, HS, Simp, AD, Conj, CD, and DS) and Rules of Equivalence (AB, Dem, Com, Assn, Dist, DN, Cont, MI, EX, ME, and RE)

 

Here are the ones I am working on right now. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

#15

1. (A∨B)∙(A∨G)

2. M→~A

3. ~Q→(~B∨~G) ∴ M→Q

#16

1. Y∙(~N∨A)

2. ~Y∨N

3. (A∙Y)→~~K ∴ K

#17

 

1. ~G→~F

2. (~F∨G)→(H∨J)

3. H→Z

4. J→~P ∴ P→Z

#18

1. (D∙E)∨(~D∙~E)

2. (H∙J)→~(D↔E)

3. ~~H∨J ∴ J↔~H

#19

1. (~E∨Z)∙(~E∨W)

2. ~K→E

3. ~K→(~Z∨~W)

4. K↔U ∴ R→U

#20

1. (R∙S)∨(R∙~E)

2. (Y∙O)→(E∙~S)

3. (O→~Y)→L ∴ L

#21

 

1. ~E

 

2. ~(E∙D)→F

3. (~F ∨ B)∙(~F∨C) ∴A∨(B∙C)

#22

1. T →R

 

2. R→S

3. ~R↔S ∴~T∙S

#23

 

1. (~K→K)→~L

 

2. ~(~L→~M)→L

3. M ∴ K↔~L

#24

1. W

2. ~Y→(~W∙~X) ∴ Y∙[(~W∙~X)→Z]

#25

1. F∨~I

2. I∨H

3. ~(G↔J)→~H ∴ [(~G∨~J)∙(G∨J)]→F

Edited by need help
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things:

 

1) Are you allowed to use Condition Proof and Indirect Proof methods?

2) What have you tried so far? (we're not in the business of doing homework, but we'll help you get the answer yourself)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things:

 

1) Are you allowed to use Condition Proof and Indirect Proof methods?

2) What have you tried so far? (we're not in the business of doing homework, but we'll help you get the answer yourself)

 

1) We have not gotten to Condition Proofs yet that is next. Not sure what indirect proof method is.

 

2) That is exactly what I want. I want to learn it not have someone do it for me. I need guidance on what to do. If I have the rules I can figure it out or when I have the answers and have to figure out which rule applies but when I have to try to map it all and figure out what rules lead to what answers to get to the end I get lost. I just need some direction and hints on what I need to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) We have not gotten to Condition Proofs yet that is next. Not sure what indirect proof method is.

 

2) That is exactly what I want. I want to learn it not have someone do it for me. I need guidance on what to do. If I have the rules I can figure it out or when I have the answers and have to figure out which rule applies but when I have to try to map it all and figure out what rules lead to what answers to get to the end I get lost. I just need some direction and hints on what I need to do.

 

We'll start with an easy one. Try number 16 and think double negation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll start with an easy one. Try number 16 and think double negation.

 

 

greentick.gif 4. (A∙Y)→K 3, DN [cond]

greentick.gif 5. (Y∙~N)∨(Y∙A) 1, Dist [disj]

greentick.gif 6. ~~(Y∙~N)∨(Y∙A) 5, DN [disj]

greentick.gif 7. ~(~Y∨~~N)∨(Y∙A) 6, DeM [disj]

greentick.gif 8. ~Y∨~~N 2, DN [disj]

greentick.gif 9. ~~(~Y∨~~N) 8, DN [nega]

greentick.gif 10. (Y∙A) 9,7, DS [conj]

greentick.gif 11. (A∙Y) 10, Com [conj]

greentick.gif 12. K 4,11, MP [atom]

Congratulations: No errors were found in the proof.

 

Edited by need help
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.