Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Page 1 of 1
The easiest and shortcut methods to do math using only human brain.....
#3 3 January 2012 - 03:48 PM
It's a good blog... everybody should develop their own little tricks to calculate, and maybe this helps some people. For me, I have my own ways.
From the blog:
I find it easier to say that 195 is 5 less than 200.
200/5=40
So, 195/5 should be 39.
By now, with 4 significant numbers it depends on the work you do. For me the good-enough answer would often be "a bit less than 600", and the calculation would go something like:
2978/5 is a little less than 3000/5, which is a little less than 600.
You don't always need 4 significant numbers. But if you do, I am not sure that dividing by 5 is so much more difficult than multiplying by 2 and dividing by 10. Still, for some people this can be helpful, and you can never practice simple mental calculations too much.
From the blog:
Quote
Dividing a large number by five is actually very simple. All you do is multiply by 2 and move the decimal point to 1 digit:
a) 195 ÷ 5
Step1: 195 × 2 = 390
Step2: Move the decimal: 39.0 or just 39
a) 195 ÷ 5
Step1: 195 × 2 = 390
Step2: Move the decimal: 39.0 or just 39
I find it easier to say that 195 is 5 less than 200.
200/5=40
So, 195/5 should be 39.
Quote
b) 2978 ÷ 5
Step 1: 2978 × 2 = 5956
Step2: 595.6
Step 1: 2978 × 2 = 5956
Step2: 595.6
By now, with 4 significant numbers it depends on the work you do. For me the good-enough answer would often be "a bit less than 600", and the calculation would go something like:
2978/5 is a little less than 3000/5, which is a little less than 600.
You don't always need 4 significant numbers. But if you do, I am not sure that dividing by 5 is so much more difficult than multiplying by 2 and dividing by 10. Still, for some people this can be helpful, and you can never practice simple mental calculations too much.
This post has been edited by CaptainPanic: 3 January 2012 - 03:51 PM
Veni, vidi, modeli - I came, I saw, and I modeled it
- Posts: 3,542 | Joined: 23-January 08
Reply
#4 3 January 2012 - 04:27 PM
michel123456, on 3 January 2012 - 03:29 PM, said:
Entertaining blog. Well done.
Thanks.
CaptainPanic, on 3 January 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:
It's a good blog... everybody should develop their own little tricks to calculate, and maybe this helps some people. For me, I have my own ways.
From the blog:
I find it easier to say that 195 is 5 less than 200.
200/5=40
So, 195/5 should be 39.
By now, with 4 significant numbers it depends on the work you do. For me the good-enough answer would often be "a bit less than 600", and the calculation would go something like:
2978/5 is a little less than 3000/5, which is a little less than 600.
You don't always need 4 significant numbers. But if you do, I am not sure that dividing by 5 is so much more difficult than multiplying by 2 and dividing by 10. Still, for some people this can be helpful, and you can never practice simple mental calculations too much.
From the blog:
I find it easier to say that 195 is 5 less than 200.
200/5=40
So, 195/5 should be 39.
By now, with 4 significant numbers it depends on the work you do. For me the good-enough answer would often be "a bit less than 600", and the calculation would go something like:
2978/5 is a little less than 3000/5, which is a little less than 600.
You don't always need 4 significant numbers. But if you do, I am not sure that dividing by 5 is so much more difficult than multiplying by 2 and dividing by 10. Still, for some people this can be helpful, and you can never practice simple mental calculations too much.
You are precisely right!
- Posts: 14 | Joined: 03-January 12
Reply
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!













