Senior Members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-20 Bad

About SamCogar

  • Rank
  1. There is a large rectangular box, fashioned out of a single piece of stone, that is situate in the Great Pyramid. But that stone box is not a sarcophagus because it did not have a stone lid (covering) .... nor is it adorned with any graphics or inscriptions. As a matter of fact, there is absolutely no sculpture, graphics or inscriptions to be found anywhere within the confines of the Great Pyramid. And given the fact that the Great Pyramid was originally encased, all four (4) sides, top to bottom, with pure white limestone, including the entrance way, resulting in an extremely smooth highly reflective surface ....... means there was no sculptures, graphics or inscriptions on the exterior surface. And a 2nd historical fact is, ...... there never was an Egyptian Ruler or Pharaoh that order the construction of anything that he/she didn't also order his//her, per se, "signature" carved everywhere in it or on it. The Egyptians just "laid claim" to the Sphynx and the Great Pyramid after they were forced to migrate out of the Sahara and across north Africa to the Nile River delta/valley.
  2. Well now, swansont and Lord Antares, I sincerely apologize to each of you for ever doubting the brilliance of your learned knowledge of paleoanthropology, ..... but, .... I personally think that both of you are doing a disservice to the science for keeping the "evidence" you speak of a "secret" from the scientific community. By the way, I just hafta ask ,,,,, does your "secret" evidence support the Multiregional Continuity Model of human origins or the Out of Africa Model of human origins? OH, MY, MY, ....... one of you, swansont or Lord Antares, please explain to me exactly what this statement means, to wit: As soon as one of you tell me "how that transformation occurred" ....... then I will almost be as intelligent as you two are.
  3. Sorry, dimreepr, .... I made no claim about robots, human or otherwise. You need to direct your question to the party making the "robot" claim.
  4. Yup, and there are remnants of physical structures on the earth’s surface that were constructed thousands of years earlier than 5,000 years ago, .....via use of technology that the humans of 5000 years ago couldn't even conceive of …… and that present day humans still do not have the technology to reproduce those same structures in their completed original form. To wit, three (3) of said ancient structures: The Great Pyramid of Giza, The Great Pyramid of Giza is the most substantial ancient structure in the world - and the most mysterious. According to prevailing archaeological theory - and there is absolutely no evidence to confirm this idea - the three pyramids on the Giza plateau are funerary structures of three kings of the fourth dynasty (2575 to 2465 BC). The World’s First Temple, Gobekli Tepe What makes Gobeklitepe unique in its class is the date it was built, Carbon-dating shows that the complex is at least 12,000 years old, maybe even 13,000 years old. The stone ruins of Puma Punku, Bolivia. Puma Punku in Bolivia is one of the world’s most mysterious ancient sites. This remains true for both academic archaeologists and historians as well as rogue historians who investigate the hypothesis of advanced prehistoric civilizations or ancient assistance from extraterrestrials. And then there are these that need explanations, to wit: Mysterious Prehistoric Artifacts (Photos) Pictures of nine (9) items of unknown origin.
  5. YADA, YADA, YADA, ……… where was/is your “burden of proof” demands for the creators/originators of the other models? Where was/is your demands that the creators/originators of the other models provide actual, factual physical evidence to support their models? Why are you obsessed with …… demanding that I provide actual, factual physical evidence to support my per se “model” of/for origins, ……….. while at the same time …… you have bestowed permission upon the creators/originators of the other “model” of origins to claim, infer, assert, etc., whatever the ell they want to claim, infer, assert, etc., without any physical evidence whatsoever to support their claims or their model? If I had introduced a discussion of the generally accepted or preferred "model" of origins ........... would your "burden of proof" demands for providing actual, factual physical evidence been presented in response to my posting of said? I don't think so.
  6. Fixed that for you. Shur nuff, you just confirmed a literal fact that those persons who are completely devoid of any learned knowledge, ideas or intelligent thoughts about the mammalian brain's ability to generate "information content" transmissions inclusive to the brain itself that is best described as being a false "live action video" that is referred to as a "dream" or "dreaming" .......... will, more often than not, claim that they don't "care to offer their learned opinion" on or about the biological fact that "dreaming" is an extremely important function to insure "survival of the fittest members of the species". Humans are not the only mammal, or primate, or hominoid, ....... that is capable of "dreaming". Therefore, ...... "dreaming" is in fact, ........ an inherited survival trait.
  7. HA, "dreaming" robots, huh? And just what reason would a robot have for "dreaming" pornographic dreams? And "live action" pornographic dreams, ...... ta boot. OOPS, I shudda said .... "wet dreams", ...... so everyone would know what "pornographic" means.
  8. The fact is, you do not speak for this biologist, ..... nor any biologist that I'm aware of. And speaking biologically, .... And mammalian eyes are not adjudged by biologists to be either compound or simple.
  9. Me thinks your "seeming" is kinda somewhat lacking in/of reasoned thought.. Both the mammalian eyes and the insect eyes are "compound" eyes ...... with the basic difference being ..... how they are, per se, "packaged". Like delboy alluded to above, .... a compound eye with 10 thousand lenses and photoreceptors on the front, ..... or a compound eye with a single lens on the front and 10 thousand photoreceptors behind it. To wit: A truly remarkable sight would be to view ....... Life Through The Eyes Of The Mantis Shrimp
  10. Oh my, my, ……. 24 hours kaput and no responses to my above post. Geeeeeze, were my questions too “tuff” for all the resident “experts”? Surely, even if my questions are too “tuff” for them to even offer their opinion, .... they should, at the very least, cite 1 or 2 or 3 url references that explains, defines and/or provides scientifically legitimate “answers”. Iffen no one dares to offer their learned opinion or cited references on/to my above questions ……. then maybe I will hafta repost them as “claims of fact” instead of “questions”.
  11. Given the fact that neither you nor anyone else is capable of citing, noting or presenting any evidence to support your preferred belief(s), …… or citing any evidence provided by those persons who you believe are correct, ……. concerning the two (2) subjects of contention, 1) the environment necessary to cause and/or influence the evolving of the physical attributes of modern humans; 2) the nurturing and functioning of the brain/mind from birth onward, ……. is literal proof that prejudice is your determiner of what is “evidence”. A “consensus of opinions” is not evidence and it does not dictate, nor mandate, what has occurred or is occurring in the natural (nature) world of planet earth.
  12. “Neurons use pulse frequency modulation to emulate analogue signals, and the function to decide whether to fire is a complex one, but I thought the magnitude of the spike is not varied. I could be wrong.” So, that must be how those brain neurons and synapses create that pseudo “live action video” that is referred to as a “dream” or ”dreaming” which we are permitted to “see” a portion of if awakened during our REM sleep period. But the really mystifying question is, …… where in ell does those neurons and synapses get all them “weirdo” pictures they use to “create” one of those pseudo “live action videos”? And another mystifying question is, …… what is it with this REM thingy (rapid eye movement) with our eye lids closed tight when we are “dreaming” up one of those pseudo “live action videos”? Does that REM actually mean that our eye balls are actually watching the “live action” movements as they are being created in our “video” dreams? Are we "seeing" actual video type graphics/pictures when we are "seeing" a dream content ...... or are we just "seeing" the transmission of information as it I being recalled from memory storage? So many questions, ….. so few answers.
  13. It sure don't work that way on this SFN Science Forum It's more like 50 minutes of "badmouthing" all NIH commentary, .... declaring it to be a WAG ...... and forbidding any further discussions or postings of the declared "WAG" subject matter. I wonder if ...... all posted subject matter is declared a "WAG" iffen it is the least bit contradictory to any of the Academically declared "settled science"? And ya'll have ignored this fact, to wit: HA, iffen Alfred Wegener, ..... a meteorologist, ...... had posted his original "tectonic plate" thoughts on this Forum, ........ WHOOOOOOPEEEE.
  14. All righty, now I understand what you meaning, …… like so, huh? WOW, fifty (50) years of debating someone's sloppy, wild-ass guesswork before it was finally discarded as "junk science" for lack of evidence.