I am unable to understand how a far away galaxy as seen from the East was together with a far away galaxy as seen from the west, a long time ago, because the process that we actually observing is exactly the contrary:

the older, the more far away.

As Mordred has pointed out you choose not to take the time to actually study the evidence. Instead you indulge yourself with a mish mash of superficial thoughts and ill informed questions. You imply that the error in understanding lies, as Strange has noted, with those who have studied these matters, rather than yourself. There is a passive-aggressive arrogance in that approach I find quite distasteful. Thank you for your time. You are now on ignore.

Ooooo, that's harsh, Ophiolite

 

I think he's a little confused, we've all been there.

When I am confused I openly declare my confusion, confess my ignorance and do not imply that the rest of the world is wrong. I believe you would follow a similar approach, or make a committed effort to educate yourself. At least Michel could adjust his manner of asking questions so that it does not sound as if he thinks orthodox science is wrong.

 

Tell you what. If Michel wishes to state that he accepts the orthodox view, but simply does not understand it, then I shall offer a full apology. Otherwise my conclusion remains.