By conventional methods it is difficult to justify Bell's theorem.

 

However we all know that a particle of zero spin can decay into 2 particles of +1/2 and -1/2 spin.

 

Using string paradigm this could be visualized as the unwrapping of 2 strings from the same parent in much the same way that a dna double helix de-couples.

 

These strings then get separated by a space like separation but the parent information is encoded in the children. (not sure why?).

 

The strings resonate with each other by a natural symphony and their resonance is reflected in their respective spin orientations and complementary and predictable behaviors.

 

This symphony is not bound by the restrictions of space.

 

It is to be noted that the two strings resonate from the point of separation and the progressive increase in distance does not play any part.

 

 

Just my concept and theory.

By conventional methods it is difficult to justify Bell's theorem....

Closer to impossible - if by conventional you mean classical

 

By conventional methods it is difficult to justify Bell's theorem.

 

However we all know that a particle of zero spin can decay into 2 particles of +1/2 and -1/2 spin.

 

Using string paradigm this could be visualized as the unwrapping of 2 strings from the same parent in much the same way that a dna double helix de-couples.

 

These strings then get separated by a space like separation but the parent information is encoded in the children. (not sure why?).

 

The strings resonate with each other by a natural symphony and their resonance is reflected in their respective spin orientations and complementary and predictable behaviors.

 

This symphony is not bound by the restrictions of space.

 

It is to be noted that the two strings resonate from the point of separation and the progressive increase in distance does not play any part.

 

 

Just my concept and theory.

 

You need to get a bit less poetical and new age - perhaps a tiny bit more rigor