Felipe Doria Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 Could someone please help me with the problem set? Imagine that light did not have a constant speed, but behaved in the manner expected from experience. Namely, if the source of the light is rushing toward you, the light will approach you faster; if the source is rushing away from you, the light will approach you slower. This is incorrect, of course, but it's worth investigating the consequences of a non-constant speed of light because the failure to observe those consequences is evidence that the speed of light is constant. With that backdrop, consider a binary star system situated a very large distance L from Earth. Let the angular velocity of the smaller star be ω, as it orbits the larger star in a circle of radius r. What value of ω=v/r will result in the light emitted when the smaller star is traveling directly away from Earth reaching us at the same moment as the light emitted later, when the smaller star's orbit has it moving directly toward earth? (choose one) a) ω=(c/r)*sqrt((πr)/(2L+2πr)) b) ω=(c/r)*((πr)/(2L+πr)) c) ω=(c/r)*sqrt((πr)/(2L+πr)) I think that the time it takes for the light emitted from the smaller star when it is traveling directly away from Earth is equal to the time it takes for the light emitted later plus the time it takes to complete half an orbit. So: t1 = t2 + t3 L/(c-v) = L/(c+v) + pi*r/v How can I get the answer from this? Thank you for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idontknowwhyijustknow Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 over my head but i see what you are getting at as far as i can tell if light was not at a constant speed then neither would time be constant (hey maybe it isn't) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 (edited) Could someone please help me with the problem set? Imagine that light did not have a constant speed, but behaved in the manner expected from experience. Namely, if the source of the light is rushing toward you, the light will approach you faster; if the source is rushing away from you, the light will approach you slower. This is incorrect, of course, but it's worth investigating the consequences of a non-constant speed of light because the failure to observe those consequences is evidence that the speed of light is constant. With that backdrop, consider a binary star system situated a very large distance L from Earth. Let the angular velocity of the smaller star be ω, as it orbits the larger star in a circle of radius r. What value of ω=v/r will result in the light emitted when the smaller star is traveling directly away from Earth reaching us at the same moment as the light emitted later, when the smaller star's orbit has it moving directly toward earth? (choose one) a) ω=(c/r)*sqrt((πr)/(2L+2πr)) b) ω=(c/r)*((πr)/(2L+πr)) c) ω=(c/r)*sqrt((πr)/(2L+πr)) I think that the time it takes for the light emitted from the smaller star when it is traveling directly away from Earth is equal to the time it takes for the light emitted later plus the time it takes to complete half an orbit. So: t1 = t2 + t3 L/(c-v) = L/(c+v) + pi*r/v How can I get the answer from this? Thank you for your help. To be honest from a quick scribble I do not get any of the above (\edit yes I do I think - will write out nicely to check) - I will have to check my workings. Regarding your equation L/(c-v) = L/(c+v) + pi*r/v remember the following Theta = omega x time ie [Rads] = [Rads/sec] x [sec] So Time = Theta / omega You are after an equation based on omega - do not reintroduce v the tangential velocity as your final term ie L/(c-v) = L/(c+v) + pi/w. And we also know from the meaning of omega that v_tangential = w.r so replace your use of v-tangential with w.r to give L/(c-wr) = L/(c+wr) + pi/w Solve for omega Here with my idea I would probably stopped where I have marked with arrow And for some reason I have used s rather than L - subconsciously I probably didnt like L as length; L should be Angular Momentum and s is displacement Edited April 10, 2014 by imatfaal rethink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamatronics Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 I think that the time it takes for the light emitted from the smaller star when it is traveling directly away from Earth is equal to the time it takes for the light emitted later plus the time it takes to complete half an orbit. So:t1 = t2 + t3 L/(c-v) = L/(c+v) + pi*r/v That is indeed the right way to put it. All you need to do now is solve for v. Once you do that, remember that v=wr so use that in the equation that you solved for v so now you´ll have your answer in terms of w and r, which is the way the options are presented in the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now