My theory on the multiverse

[Chimera]

My theory is that the multiverse is moving faster than light, and its pulling all of the other universes with it to also move faster than light, but not nearly as fast as it self, so no universe within the multiverse can ever expand past the multiverse.


If we had an object that was indestructible by relative physics, something that couldn't be destroyed, would we be able to tear a hole in space that could let us into the multiverse & travel faster than light.

The multiverse is expanding, this expansion causes our universe to also expand, our universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. The multiverse is expanding faster than our universe, if you are able to tear a hole into the fabric of space to enter the multiverse, you'd be pulled by the gravity inside that dimension faster than our universe is currently expanding, thus giving you the ability to move faster than light in our universe.


Evidence that our universe is moving faster than light speed. The big bang, is what propels all matter in the universe, the theory is pretty basic.

When objects hit eachother in space at lightspeed they act like particle accelerators, but when objects move faster than light speed, they can move through dimensions of space.

One dimention is a universe that houses all other universes, you can imagine the universes as a straight line.
-------------------------------------------------------multiverse, this multiverse also has a multiverse
------------- our universe
------------- sister universe
-------------------------------------------------------multiverse

If we want to escape to the multiverse, to enable us to travel faster than our universe can expand. We need a tunnel to leave the universe, a big bang like event to create a wormhole or rift in space to let us enter into the multiverse.

The thing about the expansion of the multiverse is that if the multiverse collapsed, our universes would eventually hit the point in which the multiverse was expanding.

----------- our universe
-----------------------------------multiverse collapses

----------------------------------- our universe reaches the point of collapse

boom big bang

- our universe
-- multiverse
------------------------------------- our universe after billions of years
------------------------------------------------------- multiverse


if we can escape to the multiverse, we'd be able to travel to any point of our universe from inside the multiverse, because by traveling outside of our universe, you can move faster than its expansion.

[Bill Angel]

My understanding of the concept of the multiverse is that there could contain an infinite number of universes, each with its own set of physical laws that could differ from the laws of the other members of the multiverse. But it is unclear to me what physical laws might be applicable, if any, in the void outside of any universe. Is it meaningful to talk about the speed of light in the void in which physical laws are undefined?

[Ophiolite]

1. What evidence do you have for your speculation?

2. If things are expanding at greater than the speed of light then, relative to each other, they are not moving all that fast, so what's the relevance of stating what happens when objects collide at near light speed?

3. You don't have a theory you have a loose speculation.

[Chimera]

Well I dreamt about it, and put it under heavy thought, I believe my evidence is speculative as well, however. One thing that leads me to believe that the multiverse is expanding faster than light, is that our very own universe is expanding faster than light. So if a multiverse exists, it must also be expanding fast enough to prevent our universe from surpassing it. My statement about objects colliding at lightspeed is an observation of the big bang, and how matter first formed, when the big bang happened objects where propelled into space at light speed, and thus they annihilated each other in collision similiar to a particle accelerator, forming different types of matter, such as carbon, hydrogen etc.

 

So I believe that if a universe hits another universe you could create a big bang, or if somehow our multiverse stopped expanding, you'd eventually hit the edge of the expanse and annihilate, forming another big bang/multiverse. Obviously we can't know how physics work within different dimentions of universes, without accomplishing someway to travel past this dimention, but without speculation you'll never have a theory.

[ajb]

My statement about objects colliding at lightspeed is an observation of the big bang, and how matter first formed, when the big bang happened objects where propelled into space at light speed, and thus they annihilated each other in collision similiar to a particle accelerator, forming different types of matter, such as carbon, hydrogen etc.

Big bang nucleosynthesis created only a very small amount of lithium-7 (and beryllium-7 which decayed into Li-7) and nothing more massive than that. The heavier elements were created in stars and supernova.

 

 

So I believe that if a universe hits another universe you could create a big bang, or if somehow our multiverse stopped expanding, you'd eventually hit the edge of the expanse and annihilate, forming another big bang/multiverse.

This reminds me of the ekpyrotic universe in which the big bang was initiated by the collision of two branes. The physics then reduces to the Lambda CDM model quickly after the collision.

 

However it maybe possible to rule this model out by detailed analysis of the CMBR. I have no idea what the current status of the ekpyrotic universe with regards to the CMBR.

[BearOfNH]

[...] Is it meaningful to talk about the speed of light in the void in which physical laws are undefined?

Not unless you can demonstrate the very existence of light itself. And distance. Oh, and time.

 

Mighty tricky, these other universes.