Jump to content

There may be something wrong with the speed of light.

Featured Replies

It seems that GR, a PDF from a member here linked me to, does not apply to this topic.

 

 

I will need the science community in helping me understand the wave function to further explain this in a more precise manner if that is at all possible, I cant comprehend the symbols. However, would this even apply if the following may be true?

 

 

Here is the E = hf = hc / wave length of which determines the energy of the photon.

 

The resulting numerator is: = 1.9878e-23????

This is the number my calculator gave me.

 

Extrapolated the new product is now 1.982e-17

 

Using this new unit of measure with cosmic rays we have the following:

 

1.982e-17/ cosmic rays 10e-16 meters = 0.01982 meters

Using an "undefined number " 1 " as a numerator we have the following:
1/0.01982 meters= 50%
The notion that the speed of light is = 1 may be incorrect due to "cycles and waves."
NOTE:
cycles= time
waves = loops in time rather 'squared units.'
Again I really don't think this here is applicable to GR or QM.
The reason being that I believe c, G, h and pi ratio all = 1
This may be something revolutionary.
Speed of light as 60 seconds.
In this case c = 60 seconds - 1 = 59 seconds. The speed of light known to be everywhere all the time mass-less, may also be this connection to pi ratio of which creates a barrier "rather" singularity that defines F= ma
However time used as seconds, also uses 60 seconds squared:
60*60*24*365 = 31536000
31536000 / hc = 1.58e+30 The exponent*2 = 60 and 1/2 or 1.5 remains constant.
God I hope people understand this!
The h constant
The h constant is the quantized energy state of this 1 which is = to 60 seconds of a complete cycle.
The above example shows this. THIS IS WHY I NEED TO KNOW THE WAVE FUNCTION
About G
The confusion with the speed of light stems from square roots and derivatives as these only " translate "derivatives " back to their initial starting positions as .5 degrees within trigonometric forms of waves leaving them as if though they have not moved at all from their initial starting x positions within the waves = loops in time rather 'squared units" as pressure dependent force carriers again :
F= ma, however angular momentum proves useful when used with manifolds, matrices and imaginary units for statistical reasons.
1 squared
The constant of 2 " rather squared units" thus squares this "ratio" .5 as 1 second squared.
Which is again useful when used with manifolds, matrices and imaginary units for statistical reasons.
However, this "will" get complex because pi, h, c and G are all = 1...
So, I will need the science community in helping me understand the wave function to further explain this in a more precise manner.
Here is another extrapolation used with:
E = hf = hc = 1.9878e-23
The extrapolated value is G = 9.8e-35 meters
Can this be tested???
Thanks!

Edited by Iwonderaboutthings

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.