juanrga Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 (edited) Any textbook gives the interpretation of the density matrix in a SINGLE continuous basis [math]|\alpha\rangle[/math]: The diagonal elements [math]\rho(\alpha,\alpha) = \langle\alpha| \hat{\rho} |\alpha\rangle[/math] give the populations. The off-diagonal elements [math]\rho(\alpha,\alpha') = \langle\alpha| \hat{\rho} |\alpha'\rangle[/math] give the coherences. But what is the physical interpretation (if any) of the density matrix [math]\rho(\alpha,\beta) = \langle\alpha| \hat{\rho} |\beta\rangle[/math] for a DOUBLE continuous basis [math]|\alpha\rangle[/math], [math]|\beta\rangle[/math]? I already know that when the double basis are momentum [math]|p\rangle[/math] and position [math]|x\rangle[/math], then [math]\rho(p,x)[/math] (the well-known Wigner function) is interpreted as a pseudo-probability. I may confess that I have never completely understood the concept of pseudo-probability [*], but I would like to know if this physical interpretation as pseudo-probability can be extended to arbitrary continuous basis [math]|\alpha\rangle[/math], [math]|\beta\rangle[/math] for non-commuting operators [math]\hat{\alpha}[/math], [math]\hat{\beta}[/math] and if a probability interpretation holds for commuting operators. I.e. can [math]\rho(\alpha,\beta)[/math] be interpreted as a pseudo-probability for arbitrary non-commuting operators beyond x and p? Can [math]\rho(\alpha,\beta)[/math] be interpreted as a probability for arbitrary commuting operators? [*] Specially because [math]\rho(p,x)[/math] is bounded and cannot be 'spike'. Edited November 23, 2012 by juanrga Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now