Jump to content

Physical continuum


NickH.

Recommended Posts

Nick - welcome to forum.

 

Could you maybe expand a little on what you are saying - or at least explain what prompts you to be so certain.

 

Physically there are fundamental particles that the standard model does not treat as divisible - the quarks (which make up protons and neutrons) and the electron are examples. Now I am pretty sure you don't have evidence that these particles are built up from/by smaller particles - so it must be a philosophical position, and no one is in a position to argue and attempt to refute that position without a greater knowledge of how you arrived at it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick - welcome to forum.

 

Could you maybe expand a little on what you are saying - or at least explain what prompts you to be so certain.

 

 

What prompts me to be so certain is logic. It is a logical position I took.

 

Physically there are fundamental particles that the standard model does not treat as divisible - the quarks (which make up protons and neutrons) and the electron are examples. Now I am pretty sure you don't have evidence that these particles are built up from/by smaller particles - so it must be a philosophical position, and no one is in a position to argue and attempt to refute that position without a greater knowledge of how you arrived at it

 

Supposedly the smallest theoretical particles are strings. If it is shown to be true, then I suppose that even they are made up of some type of objects.

Edited by NickH.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.