light and dark

[csuzi90]

So instead of 2 parallel universe colliding to make a big bang. why not anti-matter(dark) being the expansion of the universe in every direction, and matter(light) is also expanding in every direction, Collide when Light on a grand scale meets up with Dark at that point energy and radiation would occur(Big Bang) , leaving the anti-matter to expand while the matter collects itself/ "chases" anti-matter again and it starts all over. Mean while the left over matter collects itself becoming denser and transforming into heavier elements etc... ultimate becoming our universe/solar system etc. begs the question if anti-matter is always expanding and matter is always trying to catch up, would that explain why there are galaxies so far apart and how the universe is so violent but not violent close to us, and its just a big game of cat and mouse that occur. where random points in the universe anti-matter slowed down enough or was so spread apart that matter could collide and create a whole new galaxy right before our eyes. so say this is true im stuck on what created matter/anti-matter, and why is it always expanding.why does every galaxy have a black whole in the middle? are black holes huge anti-gravity powerhouses where it pulls any matter around it towards it and creates energy/radiation antimatter on the other side? forever keeping a balance of matter and anti-matter within the universe no chance of it imploding or exploding, it could be just a gigantic filter keeping our cosmos safe while letting the universe expand safely out of our way. please id love feedback just trying to make my mind rest.

[Voltarius]

That's actually not too bad of a theory, but it'd be nice if it wasn't one large block of text. And black holes aren't anti-gravitic "powerhouses" as you call them. Firstly, they're a gravitic force in themselves, which is what allows them to suck in everything in the vicinity, and they are created when too much energy occupies a specific area of space. Think of it like a bottle attached to a hose. If you had the impossible ability of controlling how much water went into the bottle, and knowing the amount of force it produced, you would continue to pack the bottle with water molecules (the molecules being the metaphor for the energy) and eventually a crack or hole would appear in the side of the bottle (non-metaphorically, a black hole) that would suck in (or spew out in the waters case) some of the tightly packed water molecules.

 

As for the rest of your questions, they are theoretical, so there isn't any real answer so far, but good job nonetheless, you made me think

[csuzi90]

Thank you for the feedback.

That is of saying that black holes "sit" in the fabric of space and a star would have had to of implode/explode for one to occur then that is correct, I don't agree on the fact that they store matter /energy as they do and that they "sit" at the bottom of the fabric of space because its a REALLY REALLY BIG object in really really small space so the gravitational force is absurd, in fact matter and light move faster than the speed of light in a black hole almost proving that dark matter exists and that it travels faster than the speed of light (CERN also has provided evidence of it just todayhttp://io9.com/5842947/scientific-breakthrough-physicists-at-cern-have-recorded-particles-moving-faster-than-light) we have a super massive one in the center of most if not all galaxies,I personally believe they are left over Dark -Matter from the creation of our universe concentrated by the left over matter , balancing the matter and anti-matter in our galaxy.providing the perfect conditions for the birth of a star, planet, us. my mind its another step forward.