stars acquire slight positive charges ?

At a given pressure, inside stars, for a given inward gravity, electrons, being less massive, experience less inward pull, despite their similar thermal energies, and higher velocities. I read in a book, that this means stars shed a few electrons, until their slight positive charge affords electrons a balancing EM attraction. The following equations attempt to mathematically model said effect. First, from the Virial Theorem [math]<U> = -2 <K>[/math], applied separately to the electronic, and ionic, components, of the stellar plasma, w.h.t.

Now, assuming thermalization of electrons & ions, s.t. [math]T_e \approx T_i[/math], we can equate these expressions, s.t.:

which, after algebraic manipulations, yields (in Coulombs):

since NS are [math]\approx 2 M_{\odot}[/math], characteristically (Kirshner. Extravagent Universe, p.36). For a pure H plasma, [math]A = Z = 1[/math], so that the 'plasma fraction' is ~1/2; whereas for a pure (and fully ionized) Fe plasma, characteristic of massive pre-collapse star cores (at [math]T \approx 300 keV[/math]) w.h.t. [math]<A> \approx 2 <Z>[/math], so that the 'plasma fraction' is ~2. Even in such a case, that's only 0.6 m-mol of electrons, out of an entire NS worth of mass.

Now, a spinning charged sphere generates a magnetic moment, and dipole-like magnetic field, of characteristic surface-strength [math]B \approx \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} \frac{m}{R^3}[/math], where the magnetic moment [math]m \approx \frac{Q}{2 M} L = \frac{1}{5} Q R^2 \omega[/math]. Thus, w.h.t. (in Tesla):

even using the most rapidly rotating pulsar observed to date. Thus, even a 1ms pulsar, would not be expected, according to these equations, to generate a surface magnetic field, in excess of 0.1G, through this method.

Edited August 8, 201114 yr by Widdekind