Jump to content

Fuctional eq.

Featured Replies

f(x+y)= f(x)f(y)

If we take log for both sides,

we have g(x)= g(x) + g(y) by letting g=log f

Then, after a series of calculation and checking,

we have f(x)= a^ (cx)

I have a few questions dealing with the log.

Can I choose any base, for example 10?

Must a=e where it is the natural log.?

Last, I am confused with the use of fixed point, or perhaps I even don't know the complete definiton of me, hence, finding myself incapable of doing this kind of calculations.

EDIT: I am very interested and enthusiastic for functional equation.

However, I can't find any books related to this topic or subtopic.

I've checked algebra, statistics. Does it belong to Discrete maths or analysis or other areas?

f(x+y)= f(x)f(y)

If we take log for both sides' date='

we have g(x)= g(x) + g(y) by letting g=log f[/quote']

 

 

do we? What happens if you subtract g(x) from both sides?

 

 

Then, after a series of calculation and checking,

we have f(x)= a^ (cx)

I have a few questions dealing with the log.

Can I choose any base, for example 10?

Must a=e where it is the natural log.?

Last, I am confused with the use of fixed point,

 

what fixed point? you haven't mentioned a fixed point.

 

or perhaps I even don't know the complete definiton of me...

 

which of us truly knows the definition of themselves?

We should point out that you've omitted to mention at least one important property that you're assuming f must have, namely continuity.

 

It is trivial to show that log(f(x)) for rational x is completely determined by f(1) and hence for rational x, f(x)=exp{kx} for some constant k, and thus by continuity f(x) is exponentiation for all x *if* we assume f is continous. If f is not continuous then there are uncountably many distinct f's with this multiplicative property.

  • Author
we have g(x)= g(x) + g(y) by letting g=log f

sorry it is g(x+y) for the left-hand side

It is trivial to show that log(f(x)) for rational x is completely determined by f(1) and hence for rational x, f(x)=exp{kx} for some constant k, and thus by continuity f(x) is exponentiation for all x *if* we assume f is continous. If f is not continuous then there are uncountably many distinct f's with this multiplicative property.

Oh I now realize the importance of the continuity.

Must we take e as the base of log?

Where does anything require you to use any particular base? logs in different bases differ only by constants. This is why at the end you only write exp{kx{ for some constant k. k can be gotten from f(1).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.