Do scientific journals mimic the behavior of the human cerebral cortex?

[bascule]

Bottom line: phenomenological objects generated in the cerebral cortex get "peer reviewed" by other parts of the cortex, and that's how their validity is ascertained.

 

http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.CY/0506024

 

The Hyper-Cortex of Human Collective-Intelligence Systems

 

Individual-intelligence research, from a neurological perspective, discusses the hierarchical layers of the cortex as a structure that performs conceptual abstraction and specification. This theory has been used to explain how motor-cortex regions responsible for different behavioral modalities such as writing and speaking can be utilized to express the same general concept represented higher in the cortical hierarchy. For example, the concept of a dog, represented across a region of high-level cortical-neurons, can either be written or spoken about depending on the individual's context. The higher-layer cortical areas project down the hierarchy, sending abstract information to specific regions of the motor-cortex for contextual implementation. In this paper, this idea is expanded to incorporate collective-intelligence within a hyper-cortical construct. This hyper-cortex is a multi-layered network used to represent abstract collective concepts. These ideas play an important role in understanding how collective-intelligence systems can be engineered to handle problem abstraction and solution specification. Finally, a collection of common problems in the scientific community are solved using an artificial hyper-cortex generated from digital-library metadata.

 

Full paper: http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs.CY/0506024