Jump to content

2D classification of gravitational waves with noise — how do you handle it?

Featured Replies

Hey everyone!
I’m working on 2D classification of gravitational wave signals (using spectrograms), but the detector noise is giving me a hard time.

Has anyone here dealt with noisy GW data before?
What kind of preprocessing or denoising methods worked best for you before training your model — like CNNs, autoencoders, or something else?

Would love to hear your experiences or tips! 🚀

I haven’t worked with gravitational wave data, but in communications we often use classic signal processing methods to deal with noise — like filtering, correlation analysis, adaptive filters, and spectral techniques. For example, matched filtering or adaptive noise suppression methods are very effective for detecting weak signals. I think similar approaches could be useful for gravitational wave analysis too.

That’s a great project — working with gravitational wave spectrograms is super exciting but yeah, detector noise can be a nightmare 😅

In my experience, a few things can help a lot:

  • Band-pass filtering or wavelet thresholding to remove low-frequency seismic noise and high-frequency artifacts.

  • Adaptive noise cancellation using reference channels from the detector environment (like seismic or magnetic sensors).

  • For ML approaches — denoising autoencoders or U-Net architectures work surprisingly well at separating real GW patterns from background noise.

  • Some teams also use transfer learning with pretrained CNNs on clean synthetic data, then fine-tune on noisy detector data.

If you haven’t tried it yet, combining traditional filtering with a learned denoising stage often gives the best of both worlds. Definitely a challenging task, but it’s where the frontier of GW data analysis is moving! 🌌💡

10 hours ago, Alisher said:

Hey everyone!
I’m working on 2D classification of gravitational wave signals (using spectrograms), but the detector noise is giving me a hard time.

Has anyone here dealt with noisy GW data before?
What kind of preprocessing or denoising methods worked best for you before training your model — like CNNs, autoencoders, or something else?

Would love to hear your experiences or tips! 🚀

Hey! 👋
Yeah, GW data can get really noisy 😅

I’ve used bandpass + wavelet denoising (with scipy.signal and pywt) before making spectrograms — that helped a lot.
For training, I used CNNs in PyTorch, with extra noise-augmented data to make the model more stable.

Some folks also try autoencoders for pre-cleaning, but honestly, simple filtering + normalization often works great.

Good luck with your analysis! 🚀

11 hours ago, Alisher said:

Hey everyone!
I’m working on 2D classification of gravitational wave signals (using spectrograms), but the detector noise is giving me a hard time.

Has anyone here dealt with noisy GW data before?
What kind of preprocessing or denoising methods worked best for you before training your model — like CNNs, autoencoders, or something else?

Would love to hear your experiences or tips! 🚀

Hi there! 👋
Yes, noise in gravitational wave (GW) data can be really challenging — especially the non-stationary, transient glitches from LIGO/Virgo detectors. A good starting point is using wavelet-based denoising or Wiener filtering before transforming the signal into spectrograms.

If you’re training CNNs, applying whitening + band-pass filtering (usually 20–500 Hz) helps a lot. Many groups also use autoencoders or denoising diffusion models to clean spectrograms before classification — check out George & Huerta (2018, Physics Letters B) and Miller et al. (2019, Phys. Rev. D) for examples.

You might also want to explore PyCBC or GWpy libraries — they have built-in functions for noise removal and spectrogram generation.
Good luck with your models — sounds like a great project! 🚀

11 hours ago, Alisher said:

Hey everyone!
I’m working on 2D classification of gravitational wave signals (using spectrograms), but the detector noise is giving me a hard time.

Has anyone here dealt with noisy GW data before?
What kind of preprocessing or denoising methods worked best for you before training your model — like CNNs, autoencoders, or something else?

Would love to hear your experiences or tips! 🚀

Hi! 👋I’ve faced similar issues — detector noise can be really tricky. Denoising autoencoders or wavelet filtering might help reduce it before training.🤔

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.