Jump to content

How is macroscopic superposition demonstrated?

Featured Replies

In general, a superposition of states is known through demonstration of interference between the two states: Refraction patterns, positive/negative interference and such.  I want to know how it is done for more macroscopic scenarios. They put a macroscopic object (one visible to the naked eye) into superposition.  It was a sliver of material suspended in some kind of field, and in superposition of vibrating (like a xylophone bar) and just sitting there.

What test was performed on such a system that couldn't be used to determine which of the two states it was in, but nevertheless demonstrated (over the course of multiple iterations of course) a pattern different than what would have been measured if the system was simply in one unknown state or the other, but not in superposition?

The article I originally read on the subject was just based on a press release and did not report such details, but it seems to be the only one that matters. A different scenario will do as well, but firing buckyballs through slits does not count as a sufficiently macroscopic superposition.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.