NickH.

Conversations ≠ discussions. You've already been asked to expand a bit more in your opening post to allow for more productive discussions. Please don't keep making us ask you what you mean, OK?

I mean is reality concurrent with the simplest and easiest explanation revealing itself to be the correct one? Is reality concurrent with Occam's razor?

Today I found out that reality is analog because it is simple and easy.

Nick - welcome to forum.

 

Could you maybe expand a little on what you are saying - or at least explain what prompts you to be so certain.

 

What prompts me to be so certain is logic. It is a logical position I took.

Physically there are fundamental particles that the standard model does not treat as divisible - the quarks (which make up protons and neutrons) and the electron are examples. Now I am pretty sure you don't have evidence that these particles are built up from/by smaller particles - so it must be a philosophical position, and no one is in a position to argue and attempt to refute that position without a greater knowledge of how you arrived at it

Supposedly the smallest theoretical particles are strings. If it is shown to be true, then I suppose that even they are made up of some type of objects.

Physical matter does go on forever if you continue cutting it up.