pawelkolasa
-
Posts
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by pawelkolasa
-
-
If F= mass * acceleration then, when you drop the same ball from different hight, it has SAME Acceleration.
We know that, the same ball dropped from different height will make different DENT.
Therefore we observe that, the higher the distance from which the ball is dropped, the bigger Force it will exert.
The Acceleration of the ball doesn't change with the height of the drop. It's the SAME 9.8 m/s^2 regardless of the height of the drop. However, its the velocity changed.
Therefore Equation for Force IS F=m * V
In Newtons equation, the Acceleration is redundant and can be cancelled entirely according to principles of mathematics. So Newton's equation is wrong, because his equation simply states, that Force IS equal to Mass.
And since Mass is dropping down toward Earth, it's WEIGHT, therefore Mass IS Weight.
Therefore, I just disproved Newton's equation for Force.
PAWEL KOLASA
p.s
Fear is the biggest intelligence killer. People fancy themselves to be intellectuals, but they fail to think because they are not. If they were intellectuals, they would not be affraid to think and form their OWN opinion.
0 -
Sorry mooey, but according to CONSERVATION OF ENERGY LAW, moving something TWICE faster doesn't require TWICE the energy. it's the same work, the same energy.
Moving the SAME weight over the SAME distance TWICE faster doesn't require TWICE more energy. It's just FASTER.
Where would the ENERGY GO just because, you move something faster? It's puzzling, how you try to desperately prove wrong theory using WRONG equation.
Mind boggling.
It's like saying that there ARE pink elephants because... Wizzard of Oz told me so!
Lol.
INSANITY - inability to tell truth from falsehood (Pawel Kolasa)
Insane people don't know that, they are insane. They know that they make no sense, but they still insist on being right. They have NO evidence to support their theories. If I tell them truth in short and logical terms, they still will deny it.
If for every action, there was an equal an opposite reaction NO ACTION WOULD BE POSSIBLE. Now, too hard to comprehend?
Nothing would be possible. No action would succeed because it would be countered with an equal an opposite reaction.
Now, tell it to children, they DO understand. They are NOT hypnotized yet!
cheers.
-3 -
He did not say this, and your misunderstanding of the laws do not make them false.
I'm not going to argue elementary physical facts here. Newton's laws are clear, and are being used routinely and consistently in elementary technology, as well as being solved routinely in high school classes -- successfully and consistently.
You expect me to take your word for it over repeated evidence. That's not going to happen.
I don't mind explaining how the laws work and getting to the bottom of your misunderstanding of it; I've done it in the past quite a lot in tutoring sessions. That said, you need to be able to consider the explanation given, and from what you're typing so far, it's getting to be quite clear you are only here to insist you're right despite of available evidence.
Do you want us to really get into the crux of the laws? We will be happy to do that, but you'll need to stop stomping your feet on the ground and insist we're wrong just 'cause you want us to be.
[[[edit]]] Egh, on second thought, I'm going to remove this explanation for now seeing as Capn made a great basic explanation and did not get into friction and inertia. Take it one step at a time, I guess.[[[/edit]]]
~mooey
Not understanding something doesn't make it wrong.
Sure, but you need to have some way of discerning what's really true and what you might want to think is true but is actually a misleading truth.
Things might LOOK like A, but actually be B after careful examination. How do you know what's true if you don't have proper ways to verify?
Biblical arguments do not belong in scientific discussions, not even speculative ones.
Work is dependent on distance -
W = F*d (force *distance).
Here's the representation of the force as an integral:
Work-energy principle connects the idea that work done by all forces acting on an object/particle equals the change of kinetic energy.
So, yes, if I move something twice as fast (that is, I bring its initial velocity from 0 to 2v, while you bring it from 0 to v) I will exert more energy.
It's also more tiring to push something twice as fast. You spend more energy.
~mooey
Sorry mooey, but according to CONSERVATION OF ENERGY LAW, moving something TWICE faster doesn't require TWICE the energy. it's the same work, the same energy.
Moving the SAME weight over the SAME distance TWICE faster doesn't require TWICE more energy. It's just FASTER.
Where would the ENERGY GO just because, you move something faster? It's puzzling, how you try to desperately prove wrong theory using WRONG equation.
Mind boggling.
It's like saying that there ARE pink elephants because... Wizzard of Oz told me so!
Lol.
-3 -
!
Moderator Note
Thread moved to the speculation forum.
Actually, as the person making the claim, it is your responsibility to support it. We have an open mind, but there are quite an extensive amount of evidence to show you are wrong -- and the only way to convince us that the physical laws (that are extensively described mathematically, and are predictable and repeatable) are false, you need to show it.
We can predict exactly what would happen if we drop object X towards object Y and/or throw two objects towards one another. If you ever played pool or snooker, you probably experienced some of it yourself. We can accurately predict these things with established equations that work consistently.
Can they be wrong? Sure, maybe, but you would need to show us (a) how they're wrong, (b) what describes that force better, namely how you propse that it works and © why is it they worked so far when your proposed theory seems to be completely reversed to the existing one.
Just saying it's wrong doesn't make it wrong. You need to show it physically and mathematically.
Go ahead.
~mooey
Newton said that for MY action there is an EQUAL reaction. Period.
You are just desperately trying to make sense of his incorrectly worded "law", which makes no sense.
When I push box, the BOX is supposedly pushing me back with the SAME force as I do, therefore I wouldn't be able to push it.
The principle is actually that for every action, there is an OPPOSITE reaction.
That reaction VARIES from minimal, to maximum of the ACTION.
e.g physicists, not being able to get out of this confusion, only insist on collision of balls with the same size and weight.
All other situations make no sense, because it's mathematically impossible for a fly to resist a TRAIN with the SAME and OPPOSITE action that the TRAIN DOES.
300 years of shameful testimony to human fear of reasoning...
I criticize Newton because I DO UNDERSTAND the Law and therefore I am able to tell you that, in its wording it's incorrect.
Yet Fear of Ridicule is working like a hypnotic spell, preventing people from standing up for what is TRUE. Truth always wins, because it's what really exists. Truth is not imaginary.
Even if Devil was the last person in the Universe, HE would know the truth anyway, lol. So you do know that Newton's Law is incorrect.
.... Not to mention that his law for "work" contains "time", therefore a mover that moves your fridge twice faster than you, performed MORE work.
Try to sell this idea to people who get paid for "piece work" lol.
-1 -
Because gravity bends space/time and light will always follow the geodesic.
Gravity can't BEND AN EMPTY SPACE.
Gravity can't BEND TIME BECAUSE, TIME IS A CONCEPT.
lol.
Pawel Kolasa
0 -
Newton's "Action-Reaction" Law is mathematically incorrect and logically INVALID.
If for every action there was "an equal an opposite reaction", no action would be possible. A force countered with equal and opposite force would cause NO net result.
Newton's law is only true for ONE specific situation of collision of equal-mass balls.
This law is actually:
"For every action there is an OPPOSITE reaction that, varies from minimal to equal".
E.g train hitting a fly will experience minimal reaction. A fly hitting a train will experience equal reaction.
Do you understand that, a train hitting a fly is NOT encountering AN EQUAL reaction?
Cowardice is an enemy of science. Most people are mediocre and therefore follow established "authorities" in science, regardless of merit.
Grow up and spread the news. It's YOUR responsibility to expose ignorance and defend the truth.
When you die, dies as heroes. When ignorants die, they die as swines.
-8
The mystery of evil and God the Benevolent
in Religion
Posted
You can't be GOOD without having an OPTION to do EVIL.
If you have option to have evil and evil is POSSIBLE it will happend because, everything that is POSSIBLE eventually HAS TO happen. Otherwise if it wasn't going to EVER happen, it would not be "possible".
That's how God could predict that, Evil will happen and could predict it.